Microwave Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation by Julianne Mckinney FULL PDF. How to Control Mind and other secrets revealed.

 

Full PDF Microwave Harassment and MIndcontrol Experimentation

 

 

And Text Version:

 

 

Table of Contents
European Symposium on Non-Lethal Weapons………………………………………………………………………..2 Bioeffects of Selected Nonlethal Weapons……………………………………………………………………………….2 City of Richmond support of the Space Preservation Act and Treaty…………………………………………..2 The Communications Industry is in the position where it is spiralling out of any person’s ability to control it – by Barrie Trower………………………………………………………………………………………………….2 ElectromagneticWeapons.info………………………………………………………………………………………………..2 MICROWAVE HARASSMENT AND MIND-CONTROL EXPERIMENTATION – by Julianne McKinney……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………2 THE LIDA MACHINE…………………………………………………………………………………………………………2 RADIOFREQUENCYIMICROWAVE RADIATION BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS AND SAFETY STANDARDS: A REVIEW – by Scfit M. Bolon………………………………………………………………………2 Infrared Laser Pointer – Invisible beam…………………………………………………………………………………..2 Human auditory system response to modulated electromagnetic energy. – by Allan H Frey…………..2 Audio Spotlight (directed sound)……………………………………………………………………………………………2 Mind-blowing Advance? Direct Brain-to-Brain Communication Between Humans Demonstrated…2 COVERT HARASSMENT CONFERENCE 2014, BRUSSELS, 20 NOVEMBER 2014………………3 Desmond Last letter to police…………………………………………………………………………………………………3 Electromagnetic Frequency Mind Control Weapons – by Stephen Lendman………………………………..3 Prime Ministry: telepathy may be involved in engineers’ deaths…………………………………………………3 Greenham Common………………………………………………………………………………………………………………3 Sonic device (LRAD) deployed in London during Olympics 2012……………………………………………..3 Michigan Passes Anti Electronic Harassment Law……………………………………………………………………3 Microwave hearing – by Mark Rich………………………………………………………………………………………..3 New World War – Revolutionary Methods for Political Control – by Mark Rich………………………….3 MICROWAVE MIND CONTROL – by Tim Rifat……………………………………………………………………3 Silent Guardian Protection System………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Targeting the Human with Directed Energy Weapons – by Dr. Reinhard Munzert………………………..4 Writing The Snowden Files: ‘The paragraph began to self-delete’……………………………………………….4 US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights…………………………………………………………………….4 Microwaving of the USA embassy in Moscow, 1976………………………………………………………………..4 Letter to Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon by a group of victims, 11 Feb 2013……………………………….4 Mosquito Anti-loitering Devices…………………………………………………………………………………………….4 How to Build a Speech-Jamming Gun…………………………………………………………………………………….4 Secret Surveillance and Electromagnetic Torture by the Secret Services (Carl Clark interview, translated)……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………4

European Symposium on Non-Lethal Weapons
Bioeffects of Selected Nonlethal Weapons
City of Richmond support of the Space Preservation Act and Treaty
The Communications Industry is in the position where it is spiralling out of any person’s ability to control it – by Barrie Trower
ElectromagneticWeapons.info
MICROWAVE HARASSMENT AND MIND-CONTROL EXPERIMENTATION – by Julianne McKinney
THE LIDA MACHINE
RADIOFREQUENCYIMICROWAVE RADIATION BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS AND SAFETY STANDARDS: A REVIEW – by Scfit M. Bolon
Infrared Laser Pointer – Invisible beam
Human auditory system response to modulated electromagnetic energy. – by Allan H Frey
Audio Spotlight (directed sound)
Mind-blowing Advance? Direct Brain-to-Brain Communication Between Humans Demonstrated
COVERT HARASSMENT CONFERENCE 2014, BRUSSELS, 20 NOVEMBER 2014
Desmond Last letter to police
Electromagnetic Frequency Mind Control Weapons – by Stephen Lendman
Prime Ministry: telepathy may be involved in engineers’ deaths
Greenham Common
Sonic device (LRAD) deployed in London during Olympics 2012
Michigan Passes Anti Electronic Harassment Law
Microwave hearing – by Mark Rich
New World War – Revolutionary Methods for Political Control – by Mark Rich
MICROWAVE MIND CONTROL – by Tim Rifat Silent Guardian Protection System
Targeting the Human with Directed Energy Weapons – by Dr. Reinhard Munzert
Writing The Snowden Files: ‘The paragraph began to self-delete’
US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights
Microwaving of the USA embassy in Moscow, 1976
Letter to Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon by a group of victims, 11 Feb 2013
Mosquito Anti-loitering Devices
How to Build a Speech-Jamming Gun
Secret Surveillance and Electromagnetic Torture by the Secret Services (Carl Clark interview, translated)
European Symposium on Non-Lethal Weapons
Every two year symposium in Ettlingen, Germany URL:
http://www.non-lethal-weapons.org/
Page 1 of 1
Freedomof Infomation/ PrivacyOffice
Nft,DonaldFriedman ConfidentialLegal Correspondence ll25 Thid Steet Napa,Califomia94559-3015
DearMr.Friedman:
References:
uxtllD
D E P A R T M E NO TF T H EA R M Y
tlAltS Affy laTttucl|lct Af,o ffqjtny
ttDof foircloic!
coina o ot trFoRxrlox/Fiw CaofftcE
G.Maao€,[aivtaxo
ao75t5t95
a . Y o u r F r e e d o mo f I n f o r m a t i o nA c t ( F O I A ) r e q u e s dt a t e dM a y 2 5 , 2 0 0 6 , t o t h e D e p a r t m e n t o f t h e A f m y , F r e e d o mo f I n f o r m a t i o n / P r i v a cAyc t D i v i s i o n ( D A F O I A / P A D I V ) , f o r a l l
d o c u m e n t ps e r t a i n i n gt o t h e m i c r o w a v ea u d i t o r ye f f e c t , m i c r o w a v eh e a r i n ge f f e c r ,F r e y e f f e c t ,
a r t i f i c i a lt e l e p a t h ya, n d / o ra n y d e v i c e / w e a p ownh i c h u s e sa n d . / ocr a u s e s s u c he f f e c t ;a n d a n y covertorundiscloseudseofhlpnosis.OnSeptembe5r,2006,theDA FOIA/PADIV refeneda copyofyourrcquestothisoffica.Yowrequeswt asreceivedonSeptembe1r1,2006.
b. OurletterofSeptembe1r3,2006,infomingyouofthesearchforrecordsatanotheerlement ofour commandandwereunabletocomplywiththe20-daystatutorytimelimit in processrng yourrequest.
As notedin ourletter,thesearchasbeencompletedwith anotheer lemenot f thiscommand andtherecordhasbe€nretumedtothisofficeforourreviewanddirectresponsteoyou.
W e h a v e c o m p l e t e da m a n d a t o r dy e c l a s s i f i c a t i or en v i e w i n a c c o r d a n c we i t h E x e c u t i v eO r d e r (EO)12958a, samendedA. saresultofthisreview,ithasbeendeterminetdhattheArmy informationo longerwarrantsecurityclassificatiopnrotectionandis releasablteo you. A copy ofthe recordis enclosedfor youruse.
Feesfor processinygourrcquesat rewaived.
DE8182000
If youhaveanyquestioncsoncemingthisaction,pleasefeelfreeto contacthisofficeat(301) 677-2308.Referto case#614F-06.
Enclosure
Sincercly,
*-a,JL”J tterfreld
Freedomof Information/PrivacyOffice InvestigativeRecordsRepository
SEEffif iieFenAr
Bioeffectsof SelectedNonlethal Weapons(fn1)
ThisaddendumtotheNonlethaTl echnologies*Worldwid(NeGIC-I147-101-98s)tudy a d d r e s s ei ns s u m m a r y s, o m e o f t h e m o s t o f t e n a s k e dq u e s t i o n os f n o n l e t h a l w e a p o n s technologyth, eph)siologicarlesponseosbservedin clinicalsettingsofthe biophysical couplingandsusceptibilitoyfpersonnetlononlethael ffectsweaponsT.heseresults identifyandvalidatesomeaspectosfmaturingnonlethatlechnologietshatmaylikelybe encounteredor usedasnonlethaleffectorsin thefutureincludins:
. Laserandotherlight phenomena.
. R a d i o f t e q u e n cdyi r e c t e de n e r g y .
.
Thestudyofelectromagnetficieldsandtheirinfluenceonbiologicasl ystemsis incraaiingrapidly.Muchofthiswo* istakingplacebecausoefhealthconcemsF.or
e x a m p l e i , n c r e a s e c d o n c e m h a s a r i s e n r e g a r d i n g t h e e f f e c t s o f o p e r a t o r e x p o s u r et o t h e electromagnetficeldsassociatewdith short-wavediathermydevicesh, ighpower microwaveovensr,ada!systemsm, agneticresonanciemagingunits,etc.In addition, muchconcemhasarisenaboutextremelylow frequenc(y60Hz powerfrequency) eleakicandmagneticfieldsthatoriginatefiom high-voltagkeansmissiolnines,indust[ial e q u i p m e n at , n d r e s i d e n t i a a l p p l i a n c e sB . o t h o c c u p a t i o n a a l n d r e s i d e n t i a l l o [ g – t e r m exposurheavebeenthefocusofepidemiologicasltudiesT. hestudieshavesuggested possibleadverseffectsonhumanhealth(e.9.,cancerr,cproductione,tc.).Laboratory
r e s e a r c i h s s t i l l b e i n g p u r s u e d t o i d e n t i f y p o s s i b l e m e c h a n i s m o s f i n t e r a c t i o n H. o w e v e r , otherthanthermalheatingfor microwavefrequenciest,hereis no yet agreed-upon mechanismofaction.As a co[sequenceo,urknowledgebaseis developeedntirelywith
p h e n o m e n o l o g i c o a b l s e r v a t i o n Bs . e c a u s eo f t h i s f a c t , i t i s n o t p o s s i b l e t o p r e d i c t h o w norithermabliologicaleffectsmaydiflbrllom oneexposuremodalitytoanother.Itis especialldyifficult,becausoefthesmalldatabaseforfastpulsest,opredictbiological effectsthat might be associatedwith high-powerpulsesofextremely shortduration.
Thereis,howevera, growingperceptionthatmicrowaveirradiationandexposureto low frequencfyieldscanbeinvolvedin awiderangeofbiologicalinteractionsS.ome investigatorsareevenbeginningto describesimilaritiesbetweenmicrowaveirradiation anddrugsregardingtheir effectson biological systems.For exarnple,somesuggesthat powerdensityandspecificabsorptionrateof microwaveirradiationmaybethoughtofas analogoustotheconcentrationofthe injectionsolutionandthedosageofdrug
EEGRADBbUNACsjsT$EDP,.ff c.
BY US.AINSCOMFOIAA AUh Psra.’. t02 DOD 52eii.tR
Awal bioeffects.
t
admin;stratiorne,spectivelyC.learly,theeffectsofmicrcwavesonbraintissue, chemistry,andfunctionsarccomplexandselective.Observationsofbody weightand behaviorrevealedthatruts,exposedrmdercertainconditionsto microwaves,eatand drinklessh, avesmallerbodyweightasaresultofnonspecificstressmediatedtbrough thecentralnenous systemandhavedecreasedmotoractivity.It hasbeerlfoundthat exposureof the animalsto onemodality of radiofiequencyelectromagneticenergy substantiallydecreasesaggtessivebehaviorduringexposureH.owever,theopposite effectsofmicrowavesi,n increasintghemobilityandaggressioonfanimals,hasalso beenshownforadifferentexposuremodalityR. ecenptublishedataimplicates microwaveassafactorrelatedtoadeficitinspatiaml emoryfunctionA. similartlpeof effectwasobservedwithexposuretoa”resonancteuned”extremelylowfrequency
m a g n e t i cf i e l d . T h u s ,t h e d a t ab a s ei s r e p l e t ew i t h p h e n o m e n o l o g i coabl s e r v a t i o nosf biologicasl ystems”affectedb” y exposureto electromagneteicnergy(.Thefactthata biologicasl ystemrespondtso anextemailnfluencedoesnotautomaticallnyoreasily truslateto thesuggestioonfadverseinfluenceonhealth.T) heobjectiveofthe present studywasto identifyinformationftomthisdevelopingunderstandinogfelectomagnetic e f f e c t so n a n i m a l s y s t e m st h a t c o u l d b e c o u p l e dw i t h h u m a nb i o l o g i c a sl u s c e p t i b i l i t i e s . SituationwshcrcthcintersectioonfthesetwodomainscoexisDt rovideoossibilitiefsor useinnonlethaalpplications.
I[capacitatingEffect:MicrowaveHeatitrg
BodyheatingtomimicafeveristhenatuleoftheR.FincapacitationT.heobjectiveisto provideheatinginaverycontrolledwaysothatthebodyreceivensearlyuniformheating a n dn o o r g a n sa r ed a m a g e dC. o r et e m p e r a t w easp p r o x i m a t e l4y1 oC a r ec o n s i d e r etdo b e adequateA.t suchtemperaturaeconsiderablcyhangedemeanowrill takeplacewiththe individualM. ostp€opleu, nderfeve!conditionsb,ecomemuchlessaggrcssives;ome peoplemaybecomemoreinitable.Thesubjectivesensationpsroducedby thisbuildupof heatarefar moreunpleasanthanthoseaccompanyingfever.In hlperthermiaall the effectorprocessesarestminedto theutrnost,whereasin fevertheyaxenot. It is also
p o s s i b l et h a t m i c r o w a v eh , ? e r t h e r m i a( e v e nw i t h o n l y a 1 ‘ C i n c r e a s ei n b r a i n temperaturem)aydisruptworkingmemory,thusresultingindisorientation.
BiologicalT srgeUNormalFunctious,/DiseaSsteate
Thetemperatureof warm-blooded(homeothermic)animalslike thehumanrcmans pnctically unchangedalthoughthesurroundingtemperaturemayvaryconsiderably.The nomal humanbodytempentue recordedftomthemouthisusuallygivenas37’ C,with theiectaltempemtueonedegreehigher.Variationbetweenindividualsistlpically
b e t w e e n3 5 . 8 ‘ C a n d 3 7 . 8 ‘ C o r a l l y . V a r i a t i o r c a l s o o c c u r i n a n y o n e i n d i v i d u a i throughouthe day-a differenceof l 0′ C or even2.0oC occurringbetweenthe maximumin thelateallemoonor earlyevedng,andtheminimumbetween3 and5 o’clockin themoming.Strenuoums usculaer x€rcisecausesa temporarryisein body temperatuethatisproportionaltotheseverityofthe exercise;thelevelmaygoashighas 40.0.c.
Extremeheatstress,suchthatthebodyscapacityfor heatlossis exceededc,ausesa pathologicalincreasein thetemperatureofthe body.Thesubjectivesensationsprcduced by thisbuildupofheat arefarmoreunpleasanthanthoseaccompanyingfever.In hyperthermiaall theeffectorprocessesarestained to theutmost,whereasin feversthey arenot. The limiting temperaturefor survival,however,is the samein both cases–abody temperatureof42o C. For briefperiods, peoplehavebeenknown to survivetemperatures ashighas43′ C.
In prolongedh)?erthermiaw, ith temperatureosver40′ C to 41. C, thebminsuffers severedamagethatusuallyleadsto death.PeriodsofhlTrerthermiaareaccompaniedby cerebraledemathatdamagenewons,andthevictim exhibitsdisorientation,delirium,and convulsionsT.hissFdromeis popularlyreferredto assunstroke,
or heatstroke, dependingonthecircumstancesW.henthehyperthermiaisprolonged,braindamage
interfereswith thecentralthermoregulatorymechanismsI.n particular,sweatsecretion ceasess,othattheconditionis furtherexacerbated.
Mechanismto ProducetheDesiredEffects
Thisconcepbtuildsonabout40yearsofexperiencewiththeheatingeffectsof microwavesN.umeroustudieshavebeenperfomedonanimalsto identify characteristicosfimportanceto theunderstandinogfenergydepositionin animalsA. s a resultof thephysicst,herelationshibpetweenthesizeofthe animalandthewavelength ofthe radiofrequenceynergyis mostimportantI.n fact,thehumanexposureguidelines
to radioftequencyradiationaredesignedaroundknowledgeofthe differential absorptionas
a functiorof fiequencyandbodysize.Thechallengeis to minimizethetimeto effect while causingnopermanentinjury to anyorganor thetotalbodyandto optimizethe equipmenftunctionT. heorientationoftheincidentenergywithrespecttotheorientation ofthe animalis alsoimportant.
In astudyofthe effectofRF radiationonbodytempelaturein theRhesusmonkey,a freqtency(225MHz) is purposelychos€nthatdepositsenergydeepwithin thebodyof theanimal.A dos€rateof 10W,&gcausedth€bodytemperatureto increaseto 42oC in a shortime(10-15min),Toavoidineversibleadverseffectst,h€exposurcwas terminatedwhena temperatureof 42oC wasreachedA. lower doserateof 5 W,&g causedthetemperaturteo increasteo 41.5oC in lessthan2 hours.Thereversiblenarure ofthis responsewasdemonstratedby therapiddrcp in bodytemperaturewhenRF exposurewasteminatedbeforeacritical temperatureof42o C wasreached.It is estimatedfor ratsthattheabso6edthresholdconrulsivedoseliesbetween22 a!|td35!/g for exposuredwationsftom lessthar a secondto l5 minutes.For 30-pinute exposurc,
the absorbedthresholddosefor decreasein enduranceis near20 J/g, the thresholdfor work stoppageapproximately9J/g,andthethresholdfor workpertubationrangesliom 5 t o 7 y g . A l l o f t h e a b o v e m e a s u r e se , x c e p ct o n v u l s i o n s ,
incapacition.
A roughestimateofthepowerrequiredtoheatahumanforthistechnologyisonthe orderof l0 Wkg givenabout15to 30minutesoftargetactivationA. ctualpowerlevels
arct)?esofnonlethal
dependon climaticfactors,clothing,andotherconsiderationsthataffecttheheatloss AomtheindividualconcemedA. methodfor expressingdoseratein termsofbody surfacearea(i.e., wattsper squaremeter)ratherthanbody mass(i.e., wattsper kilogam) wouldpemit a morereliablepredictionofthermaleffectsacrcsspeciesH. owevert,here axelargeuncertaintiesin theability to extrapolatethermorcgulatoryeffectsin laboratory animalsto thosein humanbeings.
This technologyis an adaptationoftechnology which hasbeenaroundfor manyyears.lt is well knownthatmicrowavescanbeusedto heatobjects.Not only is microwave technologuysedtocookfoods,butit isalsousedasadirectedsourceofheatinginmany industriaal pplicationsIt.waseventhesubjecot fthe Proposal’, years
“Pound afew agoin whichtheideawastoprovideresidentiahleatingtopeoplen, otlivingspaceB. ecauseof
theapparentlysafenatureofbody heatingusingmicrowavetechniquesa, varietyof innovativeusesofEM energyfor humanapplicationsarebeingexplored.Thenonlethal applicationwouldembodyahighlysophisticatemdicrowaveassembly
thatcanbeuscdto p r c j e c t m i c r o w a v e i sn o r d e r t o p r o v i d e a c o n h o l l e dh e a t i n go f p e r s o n s T. h i s c o n t r o l l e d
heatingwill raisethecoretemperaturoefthe individualsto
a
predetermined levelto
mimicahighfeverwith theint€ntofgainingapsychological/capability edgeonthe
enemyw, hilenotinflictingdeadlyforce,Theconcepot fheatingis straightforwardth;e challengeistoidgntifyandproducethecorrecmt ixofliequenciesandpowerlevels neededto do the remoteheatingwhile not injuring specificorgansin the individuals illuminatedby thebeam.
A varietyoffactorscontributeto theattractiveneossfthis nonlethal
techrologyF. irst,it
i s b a s e d o n a w e l l – k n o w n e f f e c t , h e a t i n g E. v e r y h u m a n i s s u b j e c t t o t h e e f f e c t s o f h e a t i n g ; thereforei,t wouldhavea predictabilityratingof 100%.Thetimeto onsetcanprobably beengine€retdobetweel15and30minutesh; owevert,imingisthesubjecot faddilional researctho maximizeheatingwhileminimizingadverseffeatsof localizedheating.the onsetcanbeslowenoughand,/oorfsuchfrequenctyo beunrecogniz€d person(s)
by the beinginadiatedS. afetyto innocentcsouldbeenhancebdy theapplicationandadditional
developme[tof advancedsensortechnologiesl.ocapacitationtimecouldbeextendedto almostanydesiredperiodconsistentwith safety.(GivensuitableR&D, temperatureor othervital signscouldb€monitorcdremotely,andtemperaturecouldbemaintainedata minimumeffectivepoint).
Tim€to Onset
Thetimetoonseitsafulctionofthepowerlevelbeingused.Carefullymonitored uniformheatingcouldprobablytakeplacein betweenl5 and30minutesT. imeroorcet couldbereducedbutwith increasedrisk of adverseeffects.Minimum time is deDendent onthepowerlevelofthe equipmentandtheefficiencyofthe aimingdevice.
Durationof Effect
Assumingthattheheatingis donecarefully,reversalof elevatedbody temperaturewould beginassoonasthesourceofheat is removed.
Tunability
This conceptis tunablein that anyruteofheating, up to the maximumcapacityof the souce,maybeobtained.Thusit is suitablefor usein agradualforceor ‘,rheostatic’, approachI.fthe situationallows,andthesourceissufficientlypowerful,thereisthe possibilityto usethistechnologyin a lethalmodeaswell.Prolongedbodytemperature above43’Cisalmostcertaintoresultinpermanendtarnagetothebrainanddeath.
DistributionofHuman Sensitivitiesto DesiredEffects
No reasonhasbeenidentifiedto suggesthatanyonewouldbeimmuneto this technology.Individualswith compromisedthermoregulatorymechanismswould be susceptiblewith a lower incidentenergydensity.This would includepeoplewith orgalnc damageto theh,?othalamus,thepartofthe brainthatintegatestheautonomic mechanismwshichcontrolheatlossaswellaspeoplewithcompromised
ofheatloss(e.g.,respirationw, aterbalancee, tc.).
inhomogeleousc,eftainorgansare,byvirtueoftheirsizeandgeometrym, oreeasily
coupledwith oneradiofrequencwyavelengththananotherT. herefore, permanent to avoid
damagetothesusp€cotrtoinnocenbtystardersit,maybenecessary
to varythe
Thetechnologienseededfor thethermatlechnologcyoncepat rerelativelywell d€velopebdecausoeftheknownbiophysicaml echanismth,euniversaslusceptibilitoyf humansto themechanismofheating,andbecausoefa well developed
t € c h n o l o g by a s e for theproductionofradiofrequencyladiation.Becausethehuma.nbodyis
frequenctyoavoidlocalizedheatingandconsequendtamagetoanyorgan,Additionally, it will benecessaryto avoidtheconditionsthoughtto beassociatedwith theinductionof c a t a r a c t sT . h u s , w h i l e t h e t e c h n o l o g yo f m i c r o w a v eh e a t i n gi n g e n e r a i l s m a t u l e , adaptatioansanonlethatlechnologywill rcquiresophisticated
biophysicaclalculationks) identifytheproperegimenofmicrowavellequencieasndintensitiesit; will alsobc
necessaryto optimizeexistinghardwareto meetthebioph,sicalrequirements.
PossibleItrflu€oc€or Subject(s)
Ifthe technologyfunctionsapproximatelyasenvisioned,thetargetedindividual couldbe ircapacitatewdithinl5 to30minutesB. ecaustehistechnologiysfocusedonarelatively slowonset,it shouldonlybeusedin situationswherespeedisnotimportant.Thevery uncomfortablneatureofa highbodytemperaturme aybeusefulin negotiationosr
p o s s i b l yf o r c o n t r o l l i n gc r o w d s I. t w o u l d b e e q u a l l yu s e f u lo n s i n g l ep e r s o n so t c r o w d s . Evidencealsoindicatesadisruptionofworking memorythusdisorientationmayoccur becausoefall inabilityto consolidatme emoryofthe recen(tminutesp)ast.
TechnologicaSl tatusof Generator/AimingDevice
Equipmentneededto explorethis conceptin thelaboratoryis availabletoday.Designand constructionofthe RF/microwavegenemtorwill dependontheconstraintsposedbythe calculationsp,otentialgenerationdevices,alldenergy-directingstructuresA. varietyof
somaticfeatures
optlonsexistforbothoftheseequipmennteedsT. heuseof advancedfrequencyand modulation-agiRleFgeneratioanndamplificationcircuitrywill berequiredto o”scss fully thefrequency/power/timenvelopeofRF heatingprofilesrequir;d.Althoughmuch equipmentis cornmerciallyavailable,it is likely that customhadware andsoftwarewill benecessarybecauseavailableequipmenthasnotbeendesignedwith theneedfor frequ€ncy/intensilyvariability,whichw.illprobablybeneededfor safetypurposesI.n addition,thedesignof antennasandotherenergy-directingstructueswili almost certainlyinvolveuniqueconfigurations.
Sincethistechnologyutilizesradiofiequency energyi,t canbedefeatebdytheuseof shieldingprovidedbyconductivebarierslike
metalor metalscreen. IrcapacitatingEffect:MicrowaveHearirg Microwavehearingis a phenomenon,
buzzing,ticking, hissing,or knockingsoundsthat originatewithin or imrnediatelybehind
thehead.Thereis no soundpropagatilgthroughtheair like nomal sound.This
technologiyn itscrudesf!ormcouldbeusedtodistracitldividuals:ifrefined.it could
alsobeusedtocommunicatweithhostageosrhostagetakeNdirectlybyMorsecodeor othermessagseystemsp,ossibly€venby voiaecommudcation.
BiologicalT arget/NormslFunctiotrs/Disease State
Thistechnologmy akesuse phenomenon
ofa firstdescribed
descdbebdy humanobservem. as.thesensationosf
in theliteratureover30 vears ago.Different)?esofsoundswerehearddependinogn theparticularsofthe pulse
characteristicsV.af,iousexperimentswer€performedonhumansandlaboratorvanimals
exploringtheoriginofthis phenomenon.
At thistime,virtuallyall investigatorwshohrve
s t u d i e d _ t hp eh e l o m e n o n n o w a c c e p t t h e r m o e l a s t ei c x p a n s i o on f t h e b r a i n , – t h ep r e s s u r c waveofwhichisrcceivedandprocessebdythecochleamr icrophonicsystem,iohctlrc mechanismofacousticperceptioonfshortpulsesofRFenergyO. nestudy(in1975)
usilg humanvolunteersid, entiliedthethresholdenergyofmicrowave-auditorycsponscs inhumansasafunctionofpulsewidthfor2450MHzradioftequenceynergyi.t isalso foundthatabout40J/cmzincidentenergydensityperpulsewai required.-‘
Mechanismto ProducetheDesiredEffects
After thephenomenonwasdiscovercd,severalmechanismsweresuggestedto explainthe
hearingofpulsedRF fields.Thermoelasteicxpansiown ithinthebrainin rcsponse
to RF
pulseswasflrststudiedanddemonstntedininertmatedalsfid wasDroposedasthe rnechanismofhearingofpulsedRFfields.A presstlrewaveisgeneritedinmostsolid andliquidmaterialsbyapulseofRI energy–paressurwcavethatissevemolrdersof magnitudelargerin amplitudethanthatresultilg from radiationpressureor from elecnoslrictivleorcesT. hecharacteristicosfthe field-induced
coihlearmicroohorurcn guineapigsandcatst.herelationshoipfpulseduralionandltu-esholpdh.vsicri
measuremenitnswaterandin tissue-simulatinmgaterials,
aswell asnumeroustheoretical
calculations-allpointtothermoelasticexpansionasthemechanismofthe hearins Dhenomenon.
Scientistshavedeterminedthe thresholdenergylevel for humanobserversexposedto pulsed2450-MHzfields(0.5-to32micrcnpulsewidths).Theyfoundthat,regardlesosf thepeakofthe powerdensityandthepulsewidth, theper-pulsethresholdfoia normal subjecitsneax20mJ/kg.Theavemgelevationofbraintemperature
just-perceptible
6. pulsewasestimatetdobeabout5xl0 C.
a s s o c i a t e wd i t h a
Time to Onset
Thephysicalnatureofthis themoelasticexpansiondictatesthatthesoundsareheardas theindividuapl ulsesareabsorbedT.hus,theeffectisimmediate(withinmilliseconds). Humanshavebeenexposedto R.Fenergythat resultedin the Droductionof sounds.
Durationof Effect
Microwavehearinglastsonly aslong astheexposure.Thereis no residualeffectafier cessatioonfRF energy.
Turability
Th€phenomenonis tunablein thatthecharacteristicsoundsandintansitiesofthose
soundsdependonthecharacteristics
ofthe RF energyasdeliveredB. ecaustehe
ftequencyofthe soundheardis dep€ndent pulse
on the chamcteristics
ofthe RFenergy, to the wherewordscould behansmittedtobeheardlikethespokenwod, excepthatit couldonlyboheardwithin
a person’hsead.In oneexperiment, communicatioonfthewordsfromonetotenusing
“speechmodulatedm” icrowavenergywassuccessfulldyemonstrated. Microphonensext
to thep€rsonexperiencintghevoicecouldnotpickupthesoundA. dditionadl evelonncnt ofthiswouldopenupawiderangeofpossibilities.
DistributiotrofHuman SeDsitlvities
to Desir€dEffects
Becausethephenomenonactsdirectly on cochlearprccesses,
the thermoelasticpressure
wavesploducesoundsofvarying Aequency.Manyofthe testsruntoevaluatgthe phenomenonproducedsoundsin the 5 kHz rangeandhigher.Becausehumansarekno.wn to experiencaewiderangeofhearinglossdueto cochleadr arnageit, is possiblethat somepeoplecanhearRF inducedsoundsthat otherswith high &equencyhearingloss cannotT. hus,thereisalikelyrangeofsensitivity,primarilybasedonthet)?eofpulse andtheconditionofthe cochleaB. ilateradl estructioonfthe cochleahasbeen demonstxatetdo abolishall RF-inducedauditorystimuli.
RecoYery/Safety
Humanshavebeensubjectedto this phenomenonfor many years.The energydeposrnon requiredtoproducethiseffectissosmallthatit isnotconsideredhazardous expenmentationwheninvestigatingresponsesat thejust-perceptiblelevels.
it seemspossiblethatthistechnologcyouldbedeveloped point
11
PossibleInfluenceon Subject(s)
Applicationofthe microwavehearingtechnologycouldfacilitateapdvatemessage transmissionI.t may be usefulto provide a disruptiv€conditionto a personnot awaxeof thetechnology.Not only might it bedisruptiveto thesenseofhearing, it couldbe psychologicallydevastatingif onesuddenlyheard”voiceswithin one’shead.”
TechnologicaSl tatusof Getrerator/AimingDevice
This technologyrequiresno extrapolationto estimateits usefulnessM. icrowaveenergy canbe appliedat a distance,andthe appropriatetechnologycanbe adaptedftom existing radarunits.Aiming deviceslikewise areavailablebut for specialcircumstanceswhich requireextremespecificity,theremaybeaneedforadditionaldevelopmentE.xteme directionaslpecificitywouldberequircdtohansmitamessagteoasinglehostage sunoundedbyhiscaptorsS. ignalscanbetransmittedlongdistance(shuDdredosfmeters) usingcurrentechrologyI.nngerdistanceasndmoresophisticatesdignaltlpeswill
r e q u i r em o r e b u l k y e q u i p m e n tb, u t i t s e e m sp o s s i b l et o t r a n s m i st o m et , ? e o f s i g n a l sa t closerangesusingman-potablequipment.
Range Theeffectiverangecouldbehundredosfmeters. IncapacitatingEffect:Disruptionof NeuralCoutrol
Thenatureof theincapacitationis arhythmic-activitysFchronizationof brainneurons thatdisruptsnormalcodicalconkolofthe corticospinalndcorticobulbaprathwaysthrs disruptsnormalfunctioningofthe spinalmotorneuronswhichcontrolmuscleconltlclron andbodymovementsP.ersonsufferingfromthisconditionlosevoluntarycontrolof theirbody.Thiss),nchrcnizatiomnaybeaccompaniebdyasuddenlossofconsciousness andintensemusclespasms.
BiologicalTargeUNormaFl unctions/DiseasSetrte
Thenormalfunctionofthe brainis to controlall formsofbehavior,voluntarycontrolof body,andthehomeostaticpararnete$ofthe organism.Innormalconditions,allthebrain structur€sn,euro[populations,networks,andsingleunitsfunctionwithspecificrhyhnic activitydependingontheincomingsensoryinformatioq infomation fiom mnemonic skuctwes,andsignalsf:romvisceralorgans.Eachsingleneuronprovidesspecific processingofinformation it receivesandformsaspecificpatternofimpulse firing as outgoinginformation.Synchronizationofn€won activity is a natual mechanismofthe brain functionthatusessuchcontrollingprocessesasmotivation,attentionandmemory (experience)in orderto organizebehavior.For example,motivationalprccessesare consideredasactivatingascendingsignalsthat slarchronizethe neuronactivity ofspecific brain structuresandneuronnetworks;this activation/slnchronizationin hrm activates specificformsofbehaviorsuchassexuala, ggressivein,gestiveactivities.
In normalfunctioningthe degreeofneuronal synchronizationis highly controlled.From expedmentsthatrccordtheneuronalactivity iI1differentbmin axeasimultaneouslvin animalsi,t is knownthatcorelationofspikeactivitybetweeneurons(measurebdl the correlationlevelof synchronizationc)hangesdependingontheslageof behavior,
m o t i v a t i o n a, t t e n t i o n o, r a c t i v a t i o no f t h e m e m o r y p r o c e s s e s .
HowJveru, ndersome
conditions,suchasph)rsicalstress,heatshock,or shongemotionalstress,the l€vel of s),ncbronizationmaybecomehigher,involving nonspecificlargepopulationsofbrain neuronsandtle s)mclronizationmaybecomeuncontrollable.
Dependingonatwhich frequencytheslmchronizationrh),thmoccursandhowmany neuonsareinvolved,itmayproducedifferentphysicaelffectsm; uscleweakness,
involuntarymusclecontractiols, lossofconsciousness,
orintense(tonic)musclespasms. The higherlevel of sl,nchronizationtakesplacein personsaffectedwith epilepsywhen
theyexpedencpeeriodicseizuresincetheyhaveapathologicsource(e.g.,frorninjuryto thebrain)ofrh’,thmics)’nchronizationB.ecausetheneurophysiological
epileptiformsyrchronizatioanrebetterdocumented, describeidn termsof €pileptogenesis.
Theneurophysiologicmalechanisms
activein epileptogenesis
neurotransmissioTnh.eactuadl ischargehsavebeenrecognized toresultfromaneuronal
depolarizatiosnhiftwith electricasl yrchronyin cellpopulations pa relatedin
rnechanismsof thisincapacititingtechnologyrs
involvechangeisn andneuotransmittearlteEtionsastheyaffectneuional
membrareconductances
interactionI.n theprocessofepileptogenesiesi,thersomeneuronsarcdischargingtoo easilyb€causoefalterationsin membmneconductances
or thereis a failureoiinhibitory
ro Theionicbasisandbiochemicaslubstiateofthis
changeisn membranceonductances. activationhavebeena.reaosfconsiderablsetudybutstill leavemanyquestions unansweredW. hatarcthebasiccellularpropertiesp,resent
in nomal cellsandtissuc.rhli c o u l d c o n t r i b u t et o t h e g e n e r a t i o on f a b n o r m a al c t i v i t y ? W h a t p a r t s o f t h e s y s t e m as r e
low thresholdandfunctionastriggerel€ments?
Oneofthe currenthlTrotheses
is involvedwith microcircuitry,
interactionisn neocortical andlimbicsystemstructures.

thetriggerelementhasbeenlongattributedtotheCA3pyramidaliells_a hypothesis basedon thc fact that spontaneous)mchto[ousburst dischaxgecanbe establishedin
CA3 neuons Somestudiesdescribeanintrinsicallybursting
type in the neocoftex t h a t p l a y s a r o l e s i m i l a r t o t h a t o f C A 3 c e l l s i n t h e h i p p o c a m p uasn d t h a t o f d e e p c e l l s i n
theplriform cortex.Theintrinsicnatue ofthese -e[
cells appearsto be all important
contnbutorto the establishment
of slnchronizedburstingin theseregions.Another
apparentrequirementin sucha populationis for a certaindegreeofsynaptic interaction anongneuronss,uchthatdischargoef evenonecellenliststheactivityofits neighbors. Giventhepresenceoftheseburstingcellsandtheoccurrenceofexcitatory interactions arnongthemin normaltissuei,t mayactuallybethemoryhologicsubstratefor epileptiformdischarges.
Anotherh,?tothesishasfocusedpaiicularly ontheroleofN-methyl_D-aspartate (NMDA)receptors.VariousfactorsregulatetheeffcacyofNMDA receptors:therr
particularlylocalslmapnc In thehippocamputsh,eroleof
q
voltage-dependenbtlockadeby magnesiumandmodulationby glycine andpolyamrnes. For exarnple,in thelow magnesiummodel,spontaneouslncluonousburstdischargein hippocampapllramidalcellpopulationsissensitivetoNMDAantagonistsT.hatfinding suggestshatit istheopeningofNMDA channelsb,yrelievingthemagnesiumblockade, thatfacilitatesepileptiformactivity.
Significantattentionin theliteratureis alsobeinggivento gamma-aminobutFic acid (GABA) receptorsfor thepotentialrole in controlofexcitability. Changesin GABA inhibitoryefficacycarrleadto importanet ffectsontheexcitabilityofthe system. GABAergicinhibitoryposFsynaptpicotentials(lPSPs)havebeenshowntobequite labi1einresponsteorepetitiveactivationofcorticalcellpopulationsa,smayoccurduring epileptiformdischarge.Scientistshaveshownthat evena smallpercentagechangein GABAinhibitioncanhaveprofoundeffectsonneocodicaelpilsptogenesTish.ese changesin CABAergic inhibition maybe the key to ao explanationofhow repetitive dischargpeattemsgivedsetoictaldischargeF.urthert,hereappeartsobeasignificant increasein excitatoryposts)’naptpicotentia(lEPSP)frequencpyriorto seizueinitiation anobservatiotnhatis consistenwt ith lossoflPSP efficacypriorto ictalonset-
Theaboveh)?othesedsescribedifferentmechanismosfepileptogenesibsu, tit isquite possiblethatall ofthesemechanismtsakeplace,andtheyreflectlargevarietyoft)?cs of epilepticseizuresT.hecommonprincipleofthe mechanismpsroposedis thechangeof membranperopeties(i.e.,conductancpee, rmeabilityetc.)ofcertainneuronswhich rcsultsin d€polarizationandburstdischarging.Somefactors(e,g.,tauma) canaffect th€sespecificneuronsandinitiatesynchrcnyforneuronsthatconrol intemal
c o m m u n i c a t i o a n n d c o m m u n i c a t i o wn i t h v a r i o u s m u s c l e s ) r s t e m n s o t a s s o c i a t e wd l t h vital functions(i.e.,headbeatingb, reathing)H. ighstrengthpulsedcl€ctricfieldscould alsobe sucha factor.
MechanismtoReproducetheDesiredEffects
Applicationofelectromagnetpiculsesis alsoa conceptuanlonlethatlechnologtyhatuses electromagn€ticenergyto irduce neurals)’nchronyanddisruptionof voluntarymuscle control.Theeffectivenesosfthis concepht asnotbeendemonstrateHd.oweverf,rompast work in evaluatingthe potentialfor electromagneticpulsegenerato$to aflect humans,it is estimatedthatsufficientlyshongintemalfieldscanbegeneratedwithin thebrainto triggerneurons.Estimatesarethat50to100kv/mfreefieldofverysharppulses(- InS) arerequiredto producea cell membranicpotentialof approximately2 V; this would probablyb€suflicientto triggerneuonsor makethemmoresusceptibleto firing.
The elecfomagneticpulseconceptis onein which a very fast (nanosecondtimeframe) highvoltage(approximately100kv/m orgreater)electomagneticpulseisrepeatedat thealphabrainwavefrequency(aboutl5 Hz).It isknownthatasimilarfrequencyof pulsinglightcantriggersensitiveindividuals(thosewith somedegreeof light-sensitivity epilepsy)intoaseizureandit isthoughtthatbyusingamethodthatcouldactuallytrigger nerves)’napsedsirectlywithanelectricafliel4 essentiall1y00%ofindividualswouldbe susceptibleto seizureinduction.Thephotic-inducedseizurephenomenonwasbomeout
lo
demonstrabolynDecembe1r 6,1997onJapanestelevisionrvhenhundredosfviewersof apopularcartoonshowweretreated,inadvertently,to photic seizureinduction(fi eure lU. Thephotic-inducedseizurcisindirectiDthattheeyemustrcceiveandtransmitthe impulseswhich initially activatea portion ofthe blain associatedwith the optic nerve. Fromlhatpointtheexcitabjlityspreads porlions
toother of thebrain.Wirhthe electromagneticoncept,excitationis directlyonthebrain,andall regionsareexcited
c o n c u r e n t l y T. h e o n s e t o f s F c h o n y a n d d i s r u p t i o no f m u s c u l a r c o n k ; l i s a n t i c i D a t e t do benearlyinstantaneousR.ecoverytimesareexpectedtobeconsistenwtith,ormorerapid than.thatwhichisobservedin epilepticseizures.
Timeto Onset
NoexperimentaelvidenceisavailableforthiscortceptH.oweverl,ight-inducesdeizures latencyonsetin photosensitiveepilepticsvariesfrom0.1to aboutl0 secondsB.ecausoef thefactthattheelectdcalimpuls€striggeredby light mustspreadto otherpartsoftho brain,photic-induc€dseizuesareexpectedto havea genemllysloweronsetthanneunl sFchrcny inducedby high-stength pulsedelectricfields.
Durationof Effect
Forepilepticindividualst,het]?icaldurationofa petitmaleventorapsychomoror evenr
isI minuteor2,possiblylonger,whilethedurationofagrandmalseizureisI to5
minutesI.nanon-epileptiicndividuawl hoisinducedbyel€chomagnetic meanst,he
durationsofthedifferenteventsareexpected
to beroughlythesameastheepileptic
i[dividual’seventsaftertheextemael xcitationisremoved. Tunability
Therearemanydegreeosfepilepticseizuein diseasepdenons,andit seemsreasonable thatelectromagnetsitcimulationofneuralsyrchronymightbetunablewith regardto tnc anddegeeofbodilyinfluenced,epe[dingontheparameterasssociated
with thechosen stimulus.Becausethereareno actualdatato build on, thesestatementsmustbe
consideredtentative.It is knownthat in thestudyofphotic-inducedseizues,panmeters canbevariedsothattheindividualunderstudydoesnotactuallyundergoa grandmal seizure.Thisknowledgegiv€sco[fidencethattheproposedtechnologywouid betunable.
DistributionofHumatr Sensitivitiesto DesiredEffects
I t i s a n t i c i p a t e t dh a t 1 0 0 % o f t h e p o p u l a t i o nw o u l d b e s u s c e p t i b l eT . h e m e c h a n i s mi s o n e thatcouldactorl manyindividualneuronalcellsconcurrentlyandhencedoesnot depend on spreadingregionsofelectrical activity asin the diseasestate.
PossibleInlluenceotrSubjects(s)
If thetechnologyfunctionsapproximatelyasenvisioned,thetargetedindividualcouldbe rncapacitatevdery quickly. Becausetherehavebeenno reportedstudiesusingthe
I\
conditionsspecified,experimentawlorkisrequiredtochaxacterizeonsettime.Different tlpes of technologiescould be employedto influencewide areasor singleindividuals. Becausethis technologyis consideredto be tunable,the influenceon subjectscould vary ftommilddisruptionofconcentmtiontomusclespasmsandlossofconsciousnesTsh. e subject(s)wouldhavevaryingdegreesof voluntarycontroldependingonthechosen degreeof incapacitation.
TechnologicaSl tatusof Generator/AimingDevice
An electricfieldskengthofroughly100Kv/moveratimeperiodof 1nanoseconids approximatelytheconditionthoughtto benecessaryto producethedesiredeffectwhen providedtoanoverallrepetitionrateof 15Hz.Suchafieldmaybedevelopedusinga radarlike,high-peak-powepru, lsedsouceor anelectromagnetpiculsegenerator operatedat 15Hz.Thesetechnologieesxisttodaysufficiento evaluatethedisabling
c o n c e p t P. o w e r r e q u i r e m e n t a s r e n o t h i g h b e c a u s t e h e d u t y f a c t o r i s s o l o w . A i m r n g devicesarecurentlyavailableb,utahighdegreeofdirectionalityatlorg distancewsill requiredevelopmenIt,maybenecessartyo provideburstsofthesenanoseconpdulscsin orderto stimulatethedesiredeffect.As thedutytime increasesodoestheaveragc powerrequirementfor powersource,Becausetherewerenoopenliteraturereportsfrom whichto makeinferencesth, ereis someuncertaintyabouthepowerlevelsrequired.
Ratrge Theeffectiverangecouldbehundredsofmete$. DefeatCapabilities/Limitatiors
ShieldingcanbeprovidedbyconductivebarrierslikemetalormetalscreenT.herearca numberofdrugsthatarecapableofinducingconvulsiveseizureasndothersl,ike phenoba6itald, iphenyllhydantoin,
trimethadione2,-4dinitrophenoal,ndacetazohunide, which areaoticonlulsive.Anticonvulsivedrugsareknownto behelpful in reducingthe
effectofseizuresin epil€pticpatientsb, uttheirabilityto reducetheeffectofthe proposed technologyis unlinown(possiblyno effect)but expectedto be lessthanfor photic- inducedseizures.
IncapacitatingEffect;AcousticEnergy
Thenatureofthe incapacitationcoNistsof severcprcssuresensationsn,ystagnus(a spasmodici,nvoluntarymotion ofthe eyes),andnauseacausedby high intensitiesof 9140-155dB).Nlstagmusoccruswhenconvectioncurlentsaxeproduced(cupula movement)in thelateralearcanal.This cupulamovementcausestheeyesto move involuntarilyh;encet,heextemawl orldisinterpreteadsmoving.Thesubject’,seesh’i,s surroundingstumingrcundhim andatthesainetimeexperiencesasensationof tuming. Personsexposedto theselevelsof soundexperiencenausea.
BiologicalT argevNormalFunctiols/DiseasSe tate
7
Thetwolatemlsemicircularcanals,onelocatedin eachinnerear.alertapeNontothe
f a c t t h a t h i s u p i g h t h e a di s e x p e r i e n c i n ag n g u l a ar c c e l e r a t i o nW. i t h i n t h ; a m p u l l ao f t h e canalareseveraslocalledhaircells.Theciliaofthesecellsprolrudeintothelumenof theampullawherethey{rreencasedin amassofjelly-like material(thecupula)whichis attachedtotheoppositewall ofthe canal.Astheheadacceleratest,hecilia arcbentbyan inertialforceofthe cupulaandtheviscousliquidin thecanalumen.Thebendingofihe cilia exciteshaircellswhichin tum exciteafferentneurons;tlese thenalertthebrainthat a changeofpositionofthe headhasoccurredS. imilareventsoccurwhentheheadstops moving.Theresultofa stronghaircellstimulustothebminisarapideyemovement, callnystagmusa,feelingofdizzinessanddisorientation,
vomltmg.
Normalhearingisintherangebetweenthefrequencieosf20,000to 16,000Hzwiththe optimalsensitivityfor mostpeoplebetweentheftequencieosf500 to 6000Hz.
Mechanismto ProducetheDesiredEffects
B e c a u s et h e e n d o r g a n sf o r a c o u s t i ca n d v e s t i b u l a pr e r c e p t i o na r e s o c l o s e l yr e l a t e d , intenseacousticstimulationcanresultin vestibulaer ffectsT. heh]?othesisis thatthe soundofnormalintensityproduceosscillationsofthe endolymphandperilynpn, compensatefodrbyoscillationosftheroundwindow.Highintensitysoundproduces eddycunentsw, hicharelocalizedrotational
blockcapiltarypathwaysw, hich,in tum, couldstimulatevestibulareceptorsS.timulationofthe vestibulareceptorms ayleadto
nauseandvomitingif thesoundpressurelevelis highenough. Concludethatbothtj(l(ly
currentsandvolumedisplacemensterveto stimulatevestibulareceptors
in humans,
whenexposedto highlev€lsofnoise.
Onestudyfoundnystagmumin guineapigs€xposedto highlevelsofinfrasoundvia stimulationofthevestibularrecepto$.Howev€rt,hesamelabwasunabletoproduce nystagmuisn humansubjectsat5- and10-seconedxposuretso apuretoneat 135dB, broadbanednginenoise,ora I00HztoneatI20dB,pulsedthreetimes/sor2minutes.
T h e s a r n er e s e a r c hw a s u n a b l e t o e l i c i t n y s t a g m u as t l e v e l s u p t o 1 5 5 d B , a n d a l s o e q u a l l y u n a b l e t o p r o d u c e n y s t a g m u us s i n g i n f r a s o u n dl e v e l s o f I l 2 – 1 5 0 d B i n g u i n e a p r g s , monkeys,andhumars.However,researchwith audiblecomponentsin the sound spectrumwithguineapigsandmonkeysproducednystagmusO.therresearchers
report othervestibulareffectsinadditiontonystagmusatthefollowingthresholds:125dBfiom
200-500Hz,l40 dBat1000Hz,and155dBat200Hz.Decremertsinvestibula.r tunctionoccurconsistentlyfor broadbandnoiselevelsof 140dB (with hearins prolectlon).
Humansubjectslistenedto very high levelsof low-frequencynoiseandinfrasoundin the protectedor unprctectedmodes.Two-minutedurationashigh as 140to 155dB produced a mngeof effectsfrom mild discomfortto severepressuresensations, gaggrng,
anda Dossibilitvofnauseand
fluiddisplacementHs.ighintensitysound ofthe stapesc,ausinga volumedisplacement,
canalsoproducenonlineadr isplacement theresultofwhichcanbeafluidvoidinthclaby.inthT. ofill thevoid,fluidmaybe displacedalongtheendollmphaticductand,/or
nausea,
l3
andgiddiness.Effectsalsoincludedbluned vision andvisualfield distoiions in some exposureconditions.Thenatweanddegreeofall effectswasdependenotnbothsound levelandliequencywith themostsevereeffectsoccurringin theaudiblefiequencyrange (asopposedto infrasound),at levelsaboveabout145dB. Theinvestigatorsfoundno temporarythresholdshift (TTS) amongtheir subjects,andtheuseof hearingprctecton greatlyalleviatedthe adverseeffects.
Sincethe earlydaysofjet-enginetestingandmaintenancea,[ecdotalevidencehas appearedlinking exposueto intensenoise,with suchcomplaintsasdizziness,vertigo, nausea,ndvomiting.Asaresultofsirennoiseat140dB,subjectcsonsistentlryeported afeelingofbeingpushedsidewaysu,suallyawayftomtheexposedear,andonesubject reporteddifflculty standingononefoot.
Theseeffectswerenot asdramaticasfrom th€jeFengineOroadband)noiseat 140dB. Thisresearcchoncludetshatthethresholdof labyrinthinedysfunctionis about135to 140 dBandthattheseeffectsoccurduring,butnotafter,exposurc.
Timeto Otrset
No timesto onsetofnauseaor n)stagmuswerc identified in the literaturebut is presumcd toberelativelyimmediatebasedoneffectstothelabyrinthsystemoccwringduring,but notafter,exposureto soundpressurlevelsof 135to 140dB.
Durationof Effect
Theincapacitatiolna6tsonlyaslotlgastheincapacitating present. soundis
Tunability
Basedonthedatapresenteadbovei,t is uncleawr hetherthedegreeofnauseaor nystagmusis tunable,but similar symptomscausedby other stimuli a.revariablein degre9.
DistributionofHuman Sensitivitlesto Desir€dEffects
It is mostprobablethat all individualswill be susceptibleto this stimuluswith the exceptionofthosewith a diseaseor defect(i.e.,deafmuteso) fsomepartor partsof the vestibularsystem.Datashowedno consistentdecreasein vestibulo-oculareflectswith inoeasedage.
Recovery/Safety
Normal subjectsarelikely to recoverimmediatelyandexperienceno or unmeasurable changesin hearingunlesswell known liequency-intensity-timefactorsareexceeded. This is basedon studieswhich foundno temporarythresholdshift in hearingof subjects testedatlowfrequency.Occupationaslafetypersonneglenerallyrecognizethat1I5
r+
dB(A) is to be avoidedandthat 70 dB(A) is assumedsafe.Is believedthat thenoise energywith predominatingfrequenciesabove500Hz havea greaterpotentialfor hearing lossthannoiseenergyatlowerfrequenciesO.ccupationasltandardsfornoisestatethata personmaybe exposedcontinuouslyfor 8 hoursto 90 dB(A) or 15 minutesto I 15 dB(A).
PossibleInfluenceon Subject(s)
Inductionofnystagmusandnauseawill havevariableeffectsonindividuals.Effectsmay
be sufficiently incapacitationto allow offensiveadvantage; perception
the of sickness
may makea subjectsusceptibleto peFuasion.It would be dilncult to targetsingle individualsatthepresentlevelof sounddirectingtechnology.Thistechnologymaybe bettersuit€dfor goupsofpeople.
TechtrologicaSltatusof Generator/AimltrgDevice
Soundgeneratintgechnologyis well developebdutnothighlyportableA. imingdcvices arepoorly developed.
Rrnge
Undernormalcircumstanc€sthesoundpressulelevel decrease6s dB(A) whenthe distancefromthesourceis doubledF. orexampleifthe sormdis 100dB(A) at 100It, at 200ft thesoundwouldbe94dB(A).At veryhighsoundlevels,certainconditionms ay leadto nonlineareffectsin propagationandgreatlyincreaserangeaccuracy.
DefeatCapabiliti€s/Limitrtions
Negativeffectsofaudiblesoundaregreatlydecreaseifdhearingprctectionis wom. High frequencysoundis moreeasilyblockedthanlow frequencysou[d dueto wav€lengtheff€cts.
Lrser-hduced BiologicalEffects
Their arethreebasicdamagemechanismsassociatedwith exposureto laserradiation: chemical,thermal,ardmechanicaolracoustic-mechanical.
Thelaser-inducedc,hemicalalteratio$ in irradiatedtissuearereferredto as photochemicadlamage.Thelikelihoodoflaserradiationintheblue-lightportionofthe electromagngtsicpectrum(.380to.550microns)inducingphotochemical
reactions progressiv€lyd€creasewsithincreasingwavelength.Photochemicaelffectsarenot
observeduponexposureto ndiationwith wavelengths exceedin.g550to.650micfons
becausethekineticenergyassociatedwith thesephotonsis insufficientto initiatea photochemicaclhange.
l5
Ontheotherhand,thethermaleffectis aprimaxymechanismfor laser-inducedmJury. Theextentof theinjuriesinduceddependsuponthewavelengthandenergyofthe incidentmdiation,durationofexposurea,ndthenatuleoftheexposedtissueandits absorptiocnharacteristicGs.enerallyt,hismechanismpredominiteisn thevisibleandthe near-infrared(.760to 1.4microns)portionsofthe electromagneticspectrumandfor almostallCWandpulsedexposures
between0.1millisecondasndI to 5 seconds.
Thethird injury mechanismassociatedwith exposureto laserradiationis themechanical or acoustical-mechanicaelffect.Theradiantenergyis absorbedinto thetissueand,asa resultofrapidthermael xpansiofnollowingashort(l nanosecontdo0.1millisecond) laseradiationpulse,apressurweaveisgenerated
injury.
alsoconsidenr onlineapr henomena fieldeffects.
Theorgansmostsusceptiblteo extemalaseradiationaretheskinandeyes.Theseverity ofinjury is affectedby thenatureof thetargett,heenergydensitydeliveredto themrger, thefiequencyandpowerofthe laser,atmosphericattenuationofthe beam,andtheuseof filteringor ampliflng opticsby thetargete, tc.
The primary effect on the skin is thermaldarnage(bums).The severityvariesftom slight e r ] , ‘ t h e moar r e d d e n i n gt o s e v e r eb l i s t e r i n go r c h a r r i n g d, e p e n d i n og n s u c h f a c t o r sa s t o t a l energydepositions,kinpigmentationa,ndthetissue,asbilityto dissipateheat.
Theeyeis particularlysusceptiblteo intensepulseoflaserradiationbecauseofits unique sensitivitytolight.Thefocusingeffectissimilartothatofa magnifyinglens,which focusestbeenergyonaparticularspot.Sincethecomeaandlensofthe eyeamplifythe intensityofthe lightincidenut pontheretina,theretinais extremelysensitiveto visible andnear-inftaredlight, anddamageto theretinamayresultin temporaryor permanent lossofvisualacuity.Lasereyeinjuriesvaryaccordingtoincidenpt ower,spotsize,beam angle,temporalmode(CW or pulsed),andpulserepetitionfrequency.Reportedeffects includecomeallesions,bums,cataractsa,ndretinallesions.
Somehigh-powerlaserscancauseantipersonnel
effectsby thedepositionof themal
energy.Theselasersmustoperateatawavelengththatisreadilyabsorbedby theskinor thecomea.Thesegenerallyincludethefar-andmid-IRregioru(10to 12micronsand3 to 5 microns)aswell astheultravioletregion(<0.4microns).However.ultraviolet wavelengthsgenerallydonotpropagatewell in theatmospheres,otheprimarythreat wavelengthsto be consideredarebetween3 and l2 microns.Althoughrelativelymodest amountsof far-IRlaserpowerarerequiredtoproducesuperficialbumsontheskinat shortranges,andeffortsto designrheostaticallylethallaserweaponsareon going.
Generallya,ll threemechanismosperateconcunentlyin aniradiatedanimal.Thermar effectscurrentlypredominateforcontinuouswave(CW)lasers,whilemechanicaelffects areofincreasedsigrificanceforpulsed-mode
thatmayresultin explosivetissue
lasersW. ithevenhigherpower,onemust suchasmultiphotonabsorptioanndelectromagnetic
lb
Nonlethalblinding laserweaponsgenerallyusecollimatedbeamswith very low beam divergencea,ndtheenergycontainedinthebeamdiminishesrelativelyslowlyovergreat distancesk.nagilg systemssuchaseyesandEOvisionsystemshavefocusingopticsthat bring the incidentplanewaveof light to focusat the sensorplane.This resultsin a high optical gain (geater than 100,000for eyes),which makesthe associatedsensor luLoerableto relatively low fluencesoflaser energy.
Theeffectsof laselson eyesarethreefold:
. Dazzlingor inducedg1are.
. .
Theseverityoflaser eyeinjuriesvariesaccordingto theincidentpower,spotsize,beam anglep,upildiamete(rambienltightconditions)t,emporaml ode(CWorpulsed)a,n 23.50L-2.77L). This formula puts the value of the resMo t frequency between 61.8-68.5 MHz for a standard model of man. When the human body is in contact with the electrical ground, the whole-body resonance frequency is reduced to about 47 MHz (22]. Figure 3 shows the SAR versus the incident EM field frequency for conditions of free space and grounding [22].
Numerical calculations have been presented by Hagman, Gandhi, D’Andrea, and htte j (261 that indicate the free space resonance frequency of the human head to be
about 375 MHz [26]. In a separate report, Gandhi determined that the head resonance will occur when the free space wavelength of the incident radiation is about 4 times the diameter
of the head [22]. The condition for maximum energy absorption occurs when the direction of the EM field propagation is parallel to the long axis of the body. This orientation differs from the condition determined for RF/MW energy absorption by the whole-body. Figures 4 and 5 show the absorption of energy versus frequency for different EM field orientations f26].
R FibctOf Clothng
Clothing can act as an impedance matching transformer for RF/MW radiation. In 1986, Gandhi and Riazi [6] reported that the coupling efficiency of clothing may be as high
as 90-95 percent for incident radiation in the millimeter-wave band. They determined that the thickness of the clothing and frequency of the incident radiation are important factors in the coupling condition. Figure 6 shows the relationship between clothing thickness and coupling efficiency as a function of frequency. The authors note that wet or damp clothing may actually reduce the amount of energy absorbed by the body because of the Debye relaxation of the water molecules [6].
IV. RF/MW RADIATION EXPOSURE STANDARDS
Exposure of living organisms to RF/MW radiation can have a potentially dangerous biological effect. To ensure the public safety and to safeguard the workplace against unneceuy IRF/MW radiation exposure, protective guidelines have been adopted by the United States and several other nations. The maximum safe exposure levels recognized by individual examining authorities tends to vary as a result of differing interpretations of the
15
available ItF/MW exposure data. There is a large distinction between permissible exposure evels observed in the United States and the Soviet Union. East Block countries have set
mree stringent standards than nations in the West [3], (8], (11], [22]. A. ANS Stardwv C95.1-1982
In response to the need for a national RF/MW radiation protection guide, the American Standards Association commissioned the Deparment of the Navy and The Institute
of Mectrical and Electronics Engineers to cooperate in formulating an acceptable standard for sah radiation expsure levels. In 1960, the Radiation Hazards Standards Project was established to coordinate the efforts of researchers. Since then, work has progressed and in 1982 a moden RF/MW radiation protection guide was established. The American National Stadards Institute (ANSI) designated this guide as C95.1-1982 [9]. Presently, a new ANSI guide is due for publication in May 1993. The new guide is entitled “ANSI/IEEE C95.1- 1992-. This guide will supersede C95.1-1982 when it is publishtd.
E. Reconmmendons
The ANSI C95. 1-1982 Standard specifies the maximum recommended RF/MW raliatim exposure levels over a frequency range of 300 KHz to 100 GHz. Typically, the
standard calls for an exposure of no more than 5 mWIcm? for frequencies between 1500 MElz to 100,000 MIz. The reader should consult with the actual ANSI publication for the
detailed n – — Io. In addition, the standard limits the whole-body SAR to 0.4 W/Kg and indicates that the qptial peak SAR should not exceed 8.0 W/Kg over any one gram of
Usmae For both CW and pulsed EM fields the exposure time should not exceed 6 minutes at themeomended levels. 7hes maximum safe levels are not intended to apply to the medical treatment of patients where irradiation is sometimes useful in combating diseases
lik cima’. The standard does pertain to the general public and to persons that work in eletomgnMspetic environments. There are two exceptions to the recommendation: 1)at frequencies between 100 KHz and 1 GHz the maximum exposure levels may be exceeded as long as the stated SAR values are not violated and 2) at frequencies between 300 KHz and 1 GHz the exposure levels may be exceeded if the output power of the radiating device is less than 7 W [9].
Ui. PflWOWphy
An explanation of the recommended maximum exposure levels is given as part of the prolectiorguide. The ANSI Standard is intended to afford the best possible protection of human life against RF/MW radiation exposure. The biological effect on the human body for all ,F/MW frequencies and modulation schemes is not known, therefore, investigators sought to interpret the available data in a way that would allow for the construction of the best possible RF/MW radiation protection guide. Investigators emphasized studies that tupoled harmful or potentially serious biological effects. Unlike past standards, researchers
agreed that the modern protection guide would also account for the nonthermal effects of IF/MW rdiation [9].
16
The safe exposure levels expressed by the ANSI guideline were determined for far field cexp e. The plane wave model used to specify the maximum exposure levels may not be accurate to describe conditions in the near field. However, the power density levels Sexprsd in the protection guide are not considered great enough to induce EM fields with sufficent energy intensities capable of exceeding the recommend SAR’s (91.
In selecting a measure for the dose of RF/MW radiation, it was recognized that the SAR does not encompass all of the important factors necessary to determine safe exposure levels. The modulation frequency and peak power of the incident EM field should also be considered. Some of the investigators warned that extra care should be taken by persons that are subjected to pulsed EM fields or by fields that are modulated near the whole-body reWonance frequency [91
In assessing the biological effects, it was found that behavior was the most sensitive biological component to RF/MW irradiation. It was observed that behavioral effects were
reveysble for exposure to carrier frequencies between 600 MHz and 2450 MHz when whole- body SAR’s were limited to between 4 and 8 W/Kg. For these SAR’s, power densities were calculated or measured to range from 10 mW/cm2 to 50 mW/cm2. Behavioral effects were cnidered to be among the most serious consequences of exposure to RF/MW radiation [9].
It was established that in order to ensure an acceptable margin of safety the whole- body average SAR should not exceed 0.4 W/Kg. Most of the researchers concluded that this was a necessary and reasonable standard. The exceptions cited in the recommendations were
justified on the basis of the total rate of energy absorption by the human body. The Standard repMo that small radio transceivers are able to emit EM fields that exceed the prescribed power density levels. Such devices, however, are not expected to compromise the prescribed maximum SAR levels. In general, compliance with the ANSI RF/MW protection guide is the best safeguard against harmful biological effects [9].
B. USAF PEL. (AFOSH Standard161-9, 12 Febniary 1987)
Since the early investigations of the Tri-Service Commission, the United States Air Force has recognized the need to establish an RF/MW protection standard. The USAF permissible exposure level (PEL) is specified in AFOSH Standard 161-9 enacted 12 February 1987. This standard stipulates maximum safe RF/MW radiation exposure levels over a frequency range of 10 KHz to 300 GHz. The PELs are shown in Figures 7 and 8 [10].
In general, the USAF protection guideline agrees with the ANSI Standard except that a distinction is made between exposure to persons in restricted and unrestricted areas. No
explanation for this policy is given in the USAF Standard. The PEL for restricted areas shows only a slight alteration from the ANSI recommendation. For a frequency range of 1500-300,000 M-z the USAF PEL is given as 10 mW/cm2. The PEL put forth by the USAF is intended to Protec personnel from harm by limiting the whole-body SAR to 0.4 W/IKg. Exposure periods at the maximum safe levels should be limited to 6 minutes. It is also recommended that exposure in the near zone to RFIMW sources radiating at less than 30 MHz may require a separate evaluation to determine safe exposure levels of irradiation [10].
C. Canwda Westem Furope
17
Concern over safe RF/MW radiation exposure levels has sparked controversy and sharp debate in many countries around the world. The ANSI Standard is currently reognized by most countries of the Free World including Canada, the United Kingdom, Sweden, France, and West Germany [8], [22].
D. Saviet Union & Entern Euopean Standards
The RF/MW radiation exposure standards prescribed in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe are more cosmervative than standards adopted by countries in the West [31, [8], [11]. In the Soviet Union, permissible exposure levels for whole-body irradiation are specified for various time intervals. RF/MW radiation exposures may not exceed 0.01 mW/cm2 for 3 hours/day, 0.1 mW/cm2 for 2 hours/day, and 1.0 mW/cm2 for 15-20 minutes provided that safety goggles be worn [3]. Czechoslovakia has recommended a maximum exposure level of 0.025 mW/cm2 for an average working day [8].
Investigators in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe have placed a great emphasis on the nondtema effects of biological exposure to RF/MW radiation. They contend that
eetm agei interactions with the bioelectrical and biochemical functions of the body constitute a more serious health risk than effects from thermal heating. Nonthermal
disruptions have been observed to occur at power density levels that are much lower than are necessary to induce thermal effects. Soviet researchers have attributed alterations in the
central nervous system and the cardiovascular system to the nonthermal effect of low level .F/MW radiation exposure [3], [8].
The U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare [3] reports that the differing standards put forth by the East and West may be attributed to philosophical differences in
basic research. Soviet investigators were intent on examining the effect of RF/MW radiation on the conditioned reflex response of living organisms whereas their counterparts in the West do not view this effect as an appropriate endpoint to research [3]. Recently, however, researchers in the West have sought to account for nonthermal effects in modern permissible RF/MW radiation exposure standards [9].
V. CONCLUSION
Exposure to RF/MW radiation is known to have a biological effect on living organisms. Research conducted over the past 30 years has provided a basis for
ug the effect of irradiation of biological materials. Experimental evidence has shown that exposure to low intensity radiation can have a profound effect on biological
. The nonthermal effects of RF/MW radiation exposure are becoming important measures of biological interaction with EM fields. Modem RF/MW radiation protection guides have sought to account for the effects of low level radiation exposure. Adherence to the ANSI Standard [9] should provide protection against harmful thermal effects and help to minimize the interaction of EM fields with the biological processes of the human body [9].
It is essentially the absorption of RF/MW energy that causes stress and trauma to biolgical systems. The greatest amount of energy will be absorbed when the incident radiation is emitted at the resonance frequency of biological material [9], [22]. In this regard, RF/MW radiation emitted at nonresonant frequencies should be absorbed to the
18
off. s extent when the radiating mode is a pulsed signal. The generation of such signals creates tranient responses that will match the resonant frequencies of biological materials. N at pulsed RF/MW radiation may be more harmful to living organisms than CW radiation emitted at nonresonant frequencies.
(1]
[2]
(3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
M7]
[8]
(9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13] [14
[15]
VI. REFERENCES
0. Gandhi, “Biological Effects and Medical Applications of RF Electromgnetic Fields”, IEEE Transactions Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. M’FT-30, pp. 1831-1847, 1982.
W. R. Adey, “Frequency and Power Windowing in Tissue Interactions with Weak Elecromagnetic Fields”, Proceedings IEEE, vol. 68, pp. 119-125, 1980. The Industrial Environment – Its Evaluation & Control, U.S Department of Health, Education & Welfare, pp. 371-372, 1973.
M. Stuchly, A. Kraszewski, and S. Stuchly, “Exposure of Human Models in the Near and Far Field – A Comparison”, IEEE Transactions Biomedical Engineering, vol. MTT-32, pp. 609-616, 1985.
Shin-Tsu, W. G. Lotz, and S. M. Michaelson, “Advances in Microwave- Induced Neuroendocrine Effects: The Concept of Stress”, Proceedings IEEE, vol. 68, pp. 73-77, 1980.
0. Gandhi and A. Riazi, “Absorption of Millimeter Waves by Human Beings and its Biological Implications”, IEEE Transactions Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. MTT-34, pp. 228-235, 1986.
S. M. Michaelson, “Microwave Biological Effects: An Overview”, Proceedings IEEE, vol. 68, pp. 40-49, 1980.
M. J. Dwyer and D. B. Leeper, ‘Carcinogenic Properties of Non-ionizing Radiation; Volume H – Microwave and Radiofrequency Radiation”, National Institute for Occupational Safety Technical Report, published by The U. S. Department of Health, Education & Welfare, NIOSH Contract Number 210- 76-0145, Cincinnati, March 1978.
Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagntc Fields, 300 KHz to 100 GHz, ANSI C95 1-1982. Occupational Health; Exposure to Radiofrequency Radiation, AFOSH Standard
161-9 enacted 12 February 1987.
C. C. Johnson and A. W. Guy, “Nonionizing EM Wave Effects in Biological Materials and Systems”, Proceedings IEEE, vol. 60, pp. 692, 1972.
Wen-Jei Yang, “Heat and Its Effects on the Body”, Mechanical Engineering, vol. 108, pp. 82-85, 1986.
Disuion with Capt Richard Speer, USAF, Brooks AFB, April 1988.
-The Tri-Service Program – A Tribute to George M. Knauf USAF (MC)”, IEEE Transactions Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. MrI-19, pp.
131-146, 1971.
J. C. Sharp, “Some Perspectives on Research into the Biological Response to Non-ionizing Electromagnetic Radiation”, Radio Science, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 5-10, 179.
19
[16]
[17] [181 [191
[20]
[21] [22]
[23] [24] [25]
[26]
[27] [28]
[29] (30]
[31] [32] (33]
R. J. Spiegel, “The Thermal Response of a Human in the Near-Zone of a Resonant Thin-Wire Antenna-, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and
Techniques, vol. MIT-30, pp. 177-185, 1982.
D. I. McRee, “Soviet and Eastern European Research on Biological Effects of
Microwave Radiation%, Proceedings IEEE, vol. 68, pp. 84-91, 1980. Dorland’s Illustrated Medical Dictionary, Twenty-sixth edition, published by
W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 1981.
W. M. Williams, Shin-Tsu Lu, M. Del Cerro, W. Hoss, and S. Michaelson,
“Effects of 2450-MHz Microwave Energy on the Blood-Brain Barrier: An Overview and Critique of Past and Present Research”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. MTT-32, pp. 808-817, 1984.
R. D. McAfee, “Analeptic Effect of Microwave Irradiation on Experimental Animals”, IEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. MTT-19, pp. 251-252, 1971.
‘Effects of Chronic Microwave Irradiation on Mice”, IRE Transactions Biomedical Engineering, pp. 104-108, 1962.
0. P. Gandhi, “State of Knowlede for Electromagnetic Absorbed Dose in Man and Animals”, Proceedings IEEE, vol. 68, pp. 24-32, 1980.
McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Physics and Mathematics, ed. by Daniel N. Lapedes, published by Mc-Graw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1978.
Hockh’s Chemical Dictionary. Fourth Edition, ed. by Julius Grant, published by McGraw-HiU Book Co., New York.
M. J. Hagmann, 0. P. Gandhi, and C. H. Durney, “Numerical Calculation of Electromagnetic Energy Deposition for a Realistic Model of Man”, IEEE Transactions Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. MTF-27, pp. 804-809, 1979.
M. J. Hagmann, 0. P. Gandhi, 1. A. D’Andrea, and I. Chatterjee, “Head Resonance: Numerical Solutions and Experimental Results”, IEEE Transactions Microwave Theory and Techniques, pp. 809-813, 1979.
M. E. O’Connor, “Mammalian Teratogenesis and Radio-Frequency Fields”, Proceedings IEEE, vol. 68, pp. 56-60, 1980.
J. C. Lin, A. W. Guy, and L. R. Caldwell, “Thermographic and Behavioral Studies of Rats in the Near Field of 918 MHz Radiations”, IEEE Transactions Microwave Theory and Techniques, pp. 833-836, 1977.
S. F. Cleary, “Microwave Cataractogenesis”, Proceeding IEEE, vol. 68, pp. 49-55, 1980.
R. L. McCally, R. A. Farrell, C. B. Bargcron, H. A. Kues, and B. F. Hochheimer, “Noniozing Radiation Damage in the Eye’, Johns Hopkins APL Technologies Digest, vol. 7, pp. 73-91, 1986.
J. C. Lin, “The Microwave Auditory Phenomenon”, Proceedings IEEE, vol 68, No. 1, pp. 67-73, Jan 1980.
Glenn Coin, “Electricity and Cancer: Coincidence or Reality?”, The Observer Dispatch, pp 5B, Jan 24, 1993.
Glenn Coin, ‘An Invisible Intruder’, The Observer Dispatch, pp IB & 5B, Jan 24, 1993.
20
oE
.0 V 0
x0
E
*=
4, c 0 15
0 0.0
0
CLC 0v
0 = CM
x 0C0
0 .uM
0
V 0U
0-m/mu Taz- Azsa
Nm
21.
00
00
V-4-N
E.s
EE E
200
CL .2I’ 064 -0 W-
CC
a0 Q00 CL,
0a
I %O
00 V-
ro. C,0 b..
0*x *L
w
a6 0 .0
c
0 06
(65I/M) U11-1 x UJVS 22
4) – ILL
0
01
EC EU-
6 oc
fOr
E 2L
0

– 0j0 0 C
23
0 c,
00 I ‘0i
O g.~
I 23
0
0cc
uo~OldUioCsqD0 aW~
I ~IL
0
EE 0b-
000
72 2.
v 0.
0. 000 _j
00
060
0
0 0ut LO 0 NU
3.LV NOIcMO~V Oljoad
24
wU
Y=C
c- .c 0d
rc
-00
C-
0 .U) 0~ c
‘a EC o ~C~
XU)
00
44
Oc
£0
(2 X/M)
alvu NOLb{MOSEV 25
DiAai~sS
-fto
o
o0

-j –
CL~
00
VW
oo ZQL
0o
C6
.0
3c 0
0&0
c Cc’
LCc
– ii
262
eq
c
C.L
cq LU – b. -U
7r0,;
Z
Eu
a0.
OC .~LaL.
CL
U.
CL
.0
E
CL
qa~m uaismxao~
27,
N*
20
e4 x
1
.0
C V, c .2
I;
4 CE
U)
< a CC IE 282 0L Xe v 31 C cc U. cE 40 m AMISION OF ROMELABORA TORY Mission. The mission of Rome Laboratory is to advance the science and technologies of command, control, communications and intelligence and to transition them into systems to meet customer needs. To achieve this, Rome Lab: a. Conducts vigorous research, development and test programs in all appl teolloee; b. Transitions technology to current and futue systems to mprove operatikn capabity, readiness, and sw; c. Provides a fu range of technical support to Air Force Materel Command product centers and other Air Force organizations; d. Promes trsanf of technology to the private sector e. Mantains Wading edge tecWho pertise inthe areas of surveflnce, communkatons, command and control, intelligence, reliability science, egectr-magnetic technology, photonics, signal processing, and ua ial scence. The thrust areas of technical competenc include: Survelance, Communications, Command and Control, Intelligence, Signal Processing, Computer Sience and Technology, Electrom Technology, Photoracs and laiity Saences. S* Il I HOME LASER GLASSES DIODE LASER DPSS LASER APPLICATIONS GALLERY SUPPORT Laser Pointers Laser Systems Fiber Laser Systems Holographic Lasers Laser Modules Laser Optics Engraving Lasers Newsletter Sign up for special offers, and product updates. Subscribe Dragon Lasers :: Laser Pointers :: Infrared Laser Pointer Infrared Laser Pointer (7 reviews) Infrared Laser Pointer – Invisible beam Printable version With a beam that is invisible to the naked eye, IR laser pointers cannot be used by the average laser enthusiast for many normal applications such as light shows or alignment. They are specialist laser pointers normally used for industrial and scientific applications. Infrared laser pointers are also widely used by military, government and surveillance organizations world wide. Power levels can be lowered to meet customer needs. Your cart Sign in Register Forgot password? Special offers Payment Introduction Shipping Information Warranty Information Membership Discounts Privacy statement Terms & Conditions Laser Info Name Your email: Details SKU Weight Price: Options Model Selection Quantity Add to cart Ask a question about this product Customer feedback Average customer rating: (7 reviews) Add your own review 808V200 0.20 Kg US$179.99 (Euro 143.99) Viper 808nm 200mW 1 Cart is empty Authentication Help Laser Safety Training Laser Pointer Operation Burning Laser Pointer Astronomy Laser Pointer Laser Bird Scarers Laser System Information 7 Most recent customer reviews (see all reviews): Luca M V – Italy – Jan 2010 I received the product ordered , on October,15: just four days ago: on Tuesday , October 20. Jan 29, 2010 Dragon Laser Copyright © 2005-201 s 5 Allan Frey Human auditory system response to Modulated electromagnetic energy. ALLAN H Frey General Electric Advanced Electronics Center Cornell University, Ithaca, New York Frey, Allan H. Human auditory systems response to modulated electromagnetic energy. J. Appl. Physiol. 17(4):689-692. 1962- The intent of this paper is to bring a new phenomenon to the attention of physiologists. Using extremely low average power densities of electromagnetic energy, the perception of sounds was induced in normal and deaf humans. The effect was induced several hundred feet from the antenna the instant the transmitter was turned on, and is a function of carrier frequency and modulation. Attempts were made to match the sounds induced by electromagnetic energy and acoustic energy. The closest match occurred when the acoustic amplifier was driven by the rf transmitter’s modulator. Peak power density is a critical factor and, with acoustic noise of approximately 80 db, a peak power density of approximately 275 mw/cm2 is needed to induce the perception at carrier frequencies of 425 mc and 1,310 mc. The average power density can be at least as low as 400 uw/cm2. The evidence for the various possible sites of electromagnetic energy sensor are discussed and locations peripheral to the cochlea are ruled out. A significant amount of research has been concerned with the effects of radio-frequency (rf) energy on organisms (electromagnetic energy between 1Kc and 100 Gc). Typically, this work has been concerned with determining damage resulting from body temperature increase. The average power densities used have been on the order of 0.1-1 w/cm2 used ove many minutes to several hours. In contrast, using average power densities measured in microwatts per square centimeter, we have found that other effects, which are transient, can be induced with this energy. Further, these effects occur the instant the transmitter is turned on. With appropriate modulation, the perception of various sounds can be induced in clinically deaf, as well as normal, human subjects at a distance of inches up to thousands of feet from the transmitter. With somewhat different transmitter parameters, we can induce the perception of severe buffeting of the head, without such apparent vestibular symptoms as dizziness or nausea. Changing transmitter parameters again, one can induce a “pins-and -needles” sensation. Experimental work with these phenomena may yield information on auditory system functioning and, more generally, information on nervous system function. For example, this energy could possibly be used as a tool to explore nervous system coding, possibly using Neider and Neff’s procedures (1), and for stimulating the nervous system without the damage caused by electrodes. Since most of our data have been obtained on the “rf sound” and only the visual system has previously been shown to respond to electromagnetic energy, this paper will be concerned only with the auditory effects data. As a further restriction, only data from human subjects will be reported, since only these data can be discussed meaningfully at the present time. The long series of studies we performed to ascertain that we were dealing with a biologically significant phenomenon (rather than broadcasts from sources such as loose fillings in teeth) are summarized in another paper (2), which also reports on the measuring instruments used in this work. The intent of this paper is to bring this new phenomenon to the attention of physiologists. The data reported are intended to suggest numerous lines of experimentation and indicate necessary experimental controls. Since we were dealing with a significant phenomenon, we decided to explore the effects of a wide range of transmitter parameters to build up a body of knowledge which would allow us to generate hypotheses and determine what experimental controls would be necessary. Thus, the numbers given are conservative; they should not be considered precise, since the transmitters were never located in ideal laboratory environments. Within the limits of our measurements, the orientation of the subject in the rf field was of little consequence. Most of the transmitters used to date in the experimentation have been pulse modulated with no information placed on the signal. The rf sound has been described as being a buzz, clicking, hiss, or knocking, depending on several transmitter parameters, i.e., pulse width and pulse-repetition rate (PRF). The apparent source of these sounds is localized by the subjects as being within, or immediately behind, the head. The sound always seem to come from within or immediately behind the head, no matter how the subject twists or file:///D|/Thattes%20Waves%20Auditory%20pheno/Allan%20Frey.htm (1 of 8) [2/20/06 8:59:06 AM] Allan Frey rotates in the rf field. Our early experimentation, performed using transmitters with very short square pulses and high pulse repetition rates, seemed to indicate that we were dealing with harmonics of the PRF. However, our later work has indicated that this is not the case; rather, the rf sound appears to be the incidental modulation envelope on each pulse, as shown in Fig. 1 Some difficulty was experienced when the subjects tried to match the rf sound to ordinary audio. They reported that it was not possible to satisfactorily match the rf sound to a sine wave or white noise. An audio amplifier was connected to a variable bandpass filter and pulsed by the transmitter pulsing mechanism. The subjects, when allowed to control the filter, reported a fairly satisfactory match. The subjects were fairly well satisfied when all frequencies below 5Kc audio were eliminated and the high- frequency audio was extended as much as possible. There was, however, always a demand for more high-frequency components. Since our tweeter has a rather good high frequency response, it is possible that we have shown an analogue of the visual phenomenon in which people see farther into the ultraviolet range when the lens is eliminated from the eye. In other words, this may be a demonstration that the mechanical transmission system of the ossicles cannot respond to as high a frequency as the rest of the auditory system. Since the rf bypasses the ossicle system and the audio given the subject for matching does not, this may explain the dissatisfaction of our subjects in their matching. At one time in our experimentation with deaf subjects, there seemed to be a clear relationship between the ability to hear audio above 5Kc and the ability to hear rf sounds. If a subject could hear above 5Kc, either by bone or air conduction, then he could hear the rf sounds. For example, the threshold of a subject whose audio-gram appears in Fig. 2 was the same average power density as our normal subjects. Recently, however, we have found people with a notch around 5Kc who do not perceive the rf sound generated by at least one of our transmitters. file:///D|/Thattes%20Waves%20Auditory%20pheno/Allan%20Frey.htm (2 of 8) [2/20/06 8:59:06 AM] Allan Frey THRESHOLDS TABLE 1 Transmitter parameters Trans- Frequency Wave- Pulse Width usec Pulses/Sec Duty 6 224 1 400 125 27 250 27 .007 500 27 .014 1000 27 .028 2000 27 .056 mitter mc Cycle A 1,310 .0015 B 2,982 .0004 length cm 22.9 10.4 70.6 70.6 70.6 70.6 70.6 C .0038 D E F G 425 425 425 425 425 file:///D|/Thattes%20Waves%20Auditory%20pheno/Allan%20Frey.htm (3 of 8) [2/20/06 8:59:06 AM] H 8,900 3.4 2.5 400 .001 Allan Frey As shown in Table 1, we have used a fairly wide range of transmitter parameters. We are currently experimenting with transmitters that radiate energy at frequencies below 425 mc, and are using different types of modulation, e.g., pulse-repetition rates as low as 3 and 4/sec. In the experimentation reported in this section, the ordinary noise level was 70-90 db (measured with a General Radio Co. Model 1551-B sound-level meter). In order to minimize the rf energy used in the experimentation, subjects wore Flent antinoise ear stoppers whenever measurements were made. The Ordinary noise attenuation of the Flents is indicated in Fig. 3. Although the rf sounds can be heard without the use of Flents, even above an ambient noise level of 90 db, it appears that the ambient noise to some extent “masked” the rf sound. TABLE 2 Threshold for perception of rf sound (ambient noise level 70 – 90 db) Magnetic Trans- Frequency mitter mc turns/m Power Power Electric Field A 1,310 .0015 0.4 Duty Density Cycle mw/cm2 Density Field amp mw/cm2 v/cm 267 14 4 file:///D|/Thattes%20Waves%20Auditory%20pheno/Allan%20Frey.htm (4 of 8) [2/20/06 8:59:06 AM] Avg Peak Peak Peak Allan Frey B 2,982 .0004 2.1 5,250 63 17 C 425 .0038 1.0 263 15 4 D 425 .007 1.9 271 14 4 E 425 .014 3.2 229 13 3 F 425 .028 7.1 254 14 4 Table 2 gives the threshold for perception of the rf sounds. It shows fairly clearly that the critical factor in perception of rf sound is the peak power density, rather than the average power density. The relatively high value for transmitter B was expected and will be discussed below. Transmitter G has been omitted from this table since the 20 mw/cm2 reading for it can be considered only approximate. The field-strength-measuring instruments used in that experiment did not read high enough to give an accurate reading. The energy from transmitter H was not perceived, even when the peak power density was as high as 25 w/cm2. When the threshold energy is plotted as a function of the rf energy (Fig 4), a curve is obtained which is suggestive of the curve of penetration of rf energy into the head. Figure 5 shows the calculated penetration, by frequency of rf energy, into the head. Our data indicate that the calculated penetration curve may well be accurate at the higher frequencies but the penetration at the lower frequencies may be grater than that calculated on this model. As previously noted, the thresholds were obtained in a high ambient noise environment. This is an unusual situation as compared to obtaining thresholds of regular audio sound. Our recent experimentation leads us to believe that, if the ambient noise level were not so high, these threshold field strengths would be much lower. Since one purpose of this paper is to suggest experiments, it might be appropriate to theorize as to what the rf sound threshold might be if we assume that the subject is in an anechoic chamber. file:///D|/Thattes%20Waves%20Auditory%20pheno/Allan%20Frey.htm (5 of 8) [2/20/06 8:59:06 AM] Allan Frey It is also assumed that there is no transducer noise. Given: As a threshold for the rf sound, a peak power density of 275 mw/cm2 determined in an ambient noise environment of 80 db. Earplugs attenuate the ambient noise to 30 db. If: 1 mw/cm2 is set equal to 0 db, then 275 mw/cm2 is equal to 24 db. Then: We can reduce the rf energy 50 db to -26 db as we reduce the noise level energy from 50 db to 0 db. We find that -26 db rf energy is approximately 3 uw/cm2. Thus: In an anechoic room, rf sound could theoretically be induced by a peak power density of 3 uw/cm2 measured in free space. Since only 10% of this energy is likely to penetrate the skull, the human auditory system and a table radio may be one order of magnitude apart in sensitivity to rf energy. RF DETECTOR IN AUDITORY SYSTEM One possibility that seems to have been ruled out in our experimentation is that of a capacitor type effect with the tympanic membrane and oval window acting as plates of a capacitor. It would seem possible that these membranes, acting as plates of a capacitor, could be set in motion by rf energy. There are, however, three points of evidence against this possibility. First, when one rotates a capacitor in an rf field, a rather marked change occurs in the capacitor as a function of its orientation in the field. When our subjects rotate or change positions of their heads in the field, the loudness of the rf sound does not change appreciably. Second, the distance between these membranes is rather small, compared with the wavelengths used. As a third point, we found that one of our subjects who has otosclerosis heard the rf sound. Another possible location for the detecting mechanism is in the cochlea. We have explored this possibility with nerve-deaf people, but the results are inconclusive due to factors such as tinnitus. We are currently exploring this possibility with animal preparations. The third likely place for the detection mechanism is the brain. Burr and Mauro (6) presented evidence that indicates that there is an electrostatic field about neurons. Morrow and Sepiel (7) presented evidence that indicates the existence of a magnetic field about neurons. Becker (personal communication) has done some work indicating that there is longitudinal flow of charge carriers in neurons. Thus, it is reasonable to suspect that possibly the electromagnetic field could interact with neuron fields. As yet, evidence of this possibility is inconclusive. The strongest point against is that we have not found visual effects although we have searched for them. On the other hand, we have obtained other nonauditory effects and found that the sensitive area for detecting rf sounds is a region over the temporal lobe of the brain. One can shield, with a 2-in.sq. piece of fly screen, a portion of the strippled area shown in Fig. 6 and completely cut off the rf sound. file:///D|/Thattes%20Waves%20Auditory%20pheno/Allan%20Frey.htm (6 of 8) [2/20/06 8:59:06 AM] Allan Frey Another possibility should also be considered. There is no good reason to assume that there is only one detector site. On the contrary, the work of Jones et al (8), in which they placed electrodes in the ear and electrically stimulated the subject, is sufficiently relevant to suggest the possibility of more than one detector site. Also, several sensations have been elicited with properly modulated electromagnetic energy. It is doubtful that all of these can be attributed to one detector. As mentioned earlier, the purpose of this paper is to focus the attention of physiologists on an unusual area and stimulate additional work on which interpretations can be based. Interpretations have been deliberately omitted from this paper since additional data are needed before a clear picture can emerge. It is hoped that the additional exploration will also result in an increase in our knowledge of nervous system functions. REFERENCIES: 1. Neider, P.C., and W.D.Neff. Science 133: 1010,1961. 2. Frey, A.H. Aero Space Med. 32: 1140, 1961. 3. Zwislocki, J. Noise Control 4: 42, 1958. 4. Von Gierke, H. Noise Control 2: 37, 1956. 5. Niest, R., L Pinneo, R. Baus, J. Fleming, and R. McAfee. Ann. Rept. USA Rome Air Development Command,TR-61- 65, 1961 6. Burr, H., and A. Mauro. Yale J Biol.and Med. 21:455, 1949. 7. Morrow, R., and J. Seipel. J. Wash. Acad. SCI. 50: 1, 1960. 8. Jones, R.C.,S.S. Stevens, and M.H. Lurie. J.Acoustic.Soc. Am. 12: 281, 1940. a second paper by Alan Frey Hearing in Electromagnetic Fields (extract) by Clyde E Ingalls file:///D|/Thattes%20Waves%20Auditory%20pheno/Allan%20Frey.htm (7 of 8) [2/20/06 8:59:06 AM] Allan Frey HOME PAGE file:///D|/Thattes%20Waves%20Auditory%20pheno/Allan%20Frey.htm (8 of 8) [2/20/06 8:59:06 AM] Now featuring built-in amplifier, on-board playback, IR remote control, and advanced audio processing capabilities. Any sound that misses your intended audience is noise. Only the Audio Spotlight system can keep sound focused specifically to your listeners, providing sound where you want it, and quiet everywhere else. The revolutionary Audio Spotlight technology creates a tight, narrow beam of sound that can be controlled with the same precision as light. Aim the flat, thin speaker to your desired listening area and provide all of the sound – with none of the noise. Since 2000, Audio Spotlight systems have been installed in thousands of locations around the world. From museums, exhibits, galleries and retail stores to digital signage and special projects, the world’s top companies have chosen the unique, patented Audio Spotlight technology to provide high-quality, precisely targeted sound. We are now proud to offer a fully integrated, all-in-one speaker package featuring built-in amplifier/processor, on-board playback via microSD, LCD display with metering, IR remote control, and a variety of mounting options. For a more complete list of features and detailed specifications, please visit our Products page. No loudspeaker can ever approach the directivity of Audio Spotlight technology. The Audio Spotlight uses a beam of ultrasound as a “virtual acoustic source”, enabling unprecedented control of sound distribution. The graph to the right shows the real sound field of the Audio Spotlight versus the theoretical maximum directivity of any loudspeaker, panel, dome, or “shower” of the same size. As shown by this comparison, no loudspeaker in the world can approach the level of control provided by Audio Spotlight technology. Free design assistance for any project. Targeted Message from the Audio Spotlight helps boost sales 130% Mind-blowing Advance? Direct Brain-to-Brain Communication Between Humans Demonstrated By Emily Waltz Posted 4 Sep 2014 | 20:09 GMT Starlab Barcelona In an experiment that one rival scientist dubbed a “stunt,” Spanish researchers claim to be the first to have demonstrated (http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0105225#abstract0) direct brain-to-brain communication between humans. The researchers, led by Giulio Ruffini, CEO of Starlab (http://www.starlab.es) in Barcelona, successfully transmitted the words “hola” and “ciao” in binary code from the brain of a person in India to the brains of three people in France. Electroencephalography (EEG), which monitors electric currents in the brain, was used to record the information from the sender’s brain, and robotized transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), which causes neurons to fire from an electric current that is generated by a rapidly changing magnetic field, was used to deliver the message to the brains of the receivers in France. Researchers have for years been developing noninvasive systems for translating information directly from the human brain to the computer. These systems, called brain-computer interface, often involve brain activity-sensing tools such as EEG, functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) (http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/biomedical /imaging/wearable-brain-scanner-tells-your-computer-when-youre-overwhelmed), and functional magnetic resonance imagine (fMRI). Researchers have also, to a lesser extent, experimented with translating information from the computer to the brain, using brain stimulating tools such as TMS — variations of which have also been used to treat depression (http://spectrum.ieee.org/biomedical/devices/electromagnetic-depression-treatment- nears-approval) — and transcranial focused ultrasound (FUS), which has been used to link the brains of rats (http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0060410). The Starlab experiment integrates two of these existing technologies to move a message from human brain to computer to human brain. The experiment was set up like this: While hooked up to an EEG device the sender was asked to imagine moving his hands or feet when shown an image that represented a 1 or 0, respectively. The EEG data was transmitted to the computer, translated into binary code, and emailed to the system at the recipients’ end. The recipients, blindfolded, received electric pulses from the robotized TMS system in the visual cortex of their brains. That triggered the experience of phosphenes: the perception of seeing flashes of light that are not actually there. The recipients reported verbally when they experienced a flash, and this was translated into binary code and then to the message. It’s super slow — the equivalent of telepathic Morse code. Still, the message was delivered. The authors published the experiment in PLoS One, describing it as “the first human brain-to-brain interface.” Ruffini at Starlab said the work stemmed from his company’s involvement in a four-year collaborative project (http://hive-eu.org/about)funded by the European Commission to develop noninvasive brain stimulation technologies. The paper was “a way to show that our technologies work,” said Ruffini in a phone interview. It’s a fun experiment, and it’s exciting to think about potential (but far-fetched) applications, like soldiers with high-tech helmets communicating silently behind enemy lines (http://http://www.defenseone.com/ideas/2014/09 /actual-telepathy-one-step-closer-battlefield/92954/?oref=d-river). But some researchers not involved with the experiment say the paper doesn’t really present a “first” and smacks of publicity grubbing. It’s “pretty much a stunt I think as it’s all been shown before,” said Christopher James, a professor of biomedical engineering at the University of Warwick in the UK, in an email to IEEE Spectrum. A group at the University of Washington in Seattle led by Rajesh Rao last year demonstrated in an unpublished pilot study (http://homes.cs.washington.edu/~rao/brain2brain/experiment.html) a very similar experiment involving EEG on the brain-to-computer end of the experiment and TMS on the computer-to-brain end. In that study, the researchers stimulated the motor cortex of the brain, causing the message receiver’s hand to move subconsciously to strike a keyboard. The university declared (http://www.washington.edu/news/2013/08/27 /researcher-controls-colleagues-motions-in-1st-human-brain-to-brain-interface/) it “the first noninvasive human- to-human brain interface.” That was in August 2013. Rao told IEEE Spectrum he was “surprised and disappointed” that his experiment wasn’t acknowledged in some way in Ruffini’s paper. Ruffini says he had seen Rao’s experiment before publication of his, but that since it was unpublished “there was no paper to refer to.” And he maintains that his paper was no stunt. “I believe such comments stem from not having read carefully the paper and missing the point,” he says. Ruffini’s experiment adds to scientific literature because unlike previous work, including Rao’s, he stimulated the visual cortex, bypassing all peripheral nervous system involvement, and resulting in a conscious, rather than subconscious, brain-to-brain communication, Ruffini says. Rao’s experiment “is interesting work. But I don’t think’s it’s really brain-to-brain,” he says. Future experiments will no doubt help us define what “brain-to-brain interface” really means. In the meantime, we’ll have to squabble over the few experiments under our belts. COVERT HARASSMENT CONFERENCE 2014 BRUSSELS, 20 NOVEMBER 2014 Back to Covert Harassment Conference 2015 Berlin 1+2 October 2015 >>
SPONSORS CONTACT
TI-EVENT-2014
The conference is part of the TI-EVENT-2014, a single day event to bring together the targeted individuals from all over Europe. It aims at creating more awareness on the covert crimes committed against them and humanity.
Go to the TI-EVENT-2014 website >
CONFERENCE SPEAKERS
HOME CHC 2014 VIDEOS PROGRAMME SPEAKERS INFO
Summary including videos of the Covert Harassment Conference 2014 >>
Update 9 February 2015: Very sad news reached us today. Rauni-Leena Luukanen Kilde passed away last night.
Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde’s last words at the CHC 2014:
‘We have to help ourselves. Nobody is going to help us. No institute, no government, because we are under the government. And these are government crimes, crimes against humanity. And it is on the very highest level in every single country. You can go up to the prime minister or the president … and they are behind false flag operations.
So what can we do? First of all it’s awareness, awareness,
awareness. Talk about it to anybody. And people who are not victims they will not listen, and they don’t want to listen because they are afraid. Because if they
listen they know they may become victims. So they just deny everything. But we have to. Because one thing that helps us, I think. We know there is no death, we have an energy body. And it does keep us going and if it doesn’t keep you going, it keeps me going because you know you cannot die. And that’s why I am not afraid.’ Video.
Rauni’s lecture: Bright light on black shadows, man is a mind, not a body
EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON COVERT HARASSMENT OF CIVILIANS 2014
More >
More >
Magnus Olsson Economics at Cesar Ritz in Switzerland, American University of Paris and Harvard, Boston, USA.
Peter Mooring Electronics and Computer Architecture at Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands.
William Binney
NSA whistleblower. Former employee of NSA, Consultant to US government intelligence
25% of microwave radiation of a microwave oven goes through wall
agencies including CIA, NRO, Homeland Security.
More >
Germany.
More >
Dr. Henning Witte Law School at Munich, Uppsala (Sweden) and Bonn. Dr. of law at Frankfurt University,
Dr. Rauni Kilde
Former acting director of ENVIRONMENTAL Health and Health education of National Institute of Health
We are very proud to announce our first conference on covert harassment. The conference is the first of an annual human rights conference with the aim to create awareness on the covert harassment of civilians. Not only whistle blowers, activists and political opponents are targeted, but also thousands of innocent civilians are subjected to non-consensual testing and mind control experimentation by a myriad of non-lethal weapons and covert community harassment by government and non-government agencies. The conference addresses these issues on individual and global scale, and is also about trying to find
solutions for all those targeted, which soon will be all children of our world.
News:
24 december 2014: Summary including videos of the Covert Harassment Conference 2014 online
22 November 2014: Thank you so much!
The conference took place, we had some 115 participants (excluding speakers), few journalists and doctors, most were TI’s. We had visitors from Russia, Ireland, Norway, Bulgaria, Italy, Malaysia, etc. We will publish details later. We understand that for most TI’s it is very difficult to come. For this it is almost impossible to express our gratitude to all who came. We also want to thank our speakers, without them, the conference would not have been possible. And we also want to thank the people who asked questions during the panel discussion, we value your input very much!
The participants list will be send soon, we will put the lectures online in weeks (please be patient) and will contact everyone who sent us messages.
This conference is not over yet!
From our hearts we thank you.
Peter, Melanie, Magnus, Kim, Beata
of Finland in Helsinki and govt. of Finlands representative in WHO Geneva
More >
11 November 2014: The programme is more or less final
5 November 2014: Press release Covert Harassment Conference: WORLD’S FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COVERT HARASSMENT EXPOSES ROBOTIZATION OF HUMANS
29 October 2014: Background information in Polish
18 October 2014: John Allman to speak at the conference
10 October 2014: Magnus Olsson announces NSA whistleblower William Binney speaking at the Covert Harassment Conference!
9 October 2014: Buy your tickets online
3 October 2014: Download the promotion documents
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Read more about the conference in English, Francais (French), Deutsch (German), Nederlands (Dutch),
česky (Czech), Polski (Polish). WHO SHOULD ATTEND
More >
Nations.
More >
Law.
Mojmír Babáček Philosophy and Economy at Charles University in Prag. Writer, Czech Republic.
Alfred Lambremont Webre, MA, JD
Yale University, Yale Law School international law. NGO delegate United
John Allman
Open University Mathematics and Science, Software development, Post-graduate Diploma in
Everyone concerned with the direction our world is going to. Especially politicians, journalists, human rights organizations and activists, lawyers, police and military personnel, doctors and psychiatrists should not miss this conference. And of course we hope to welcome many victims of these crimes joined by friends and/or family members.
AIMS OF THE CONFERENCE
The aims of the Covert Harassment Conference 2014:
To challenge general ignorance, governments denial and mainstream media silence regarding the development and existence of the sophisticated spectrum of harassment methodologies and bio-electromagnetic technology (a.k.a. mind-control technology), capable of not only influencing the human body, behaviour, emotions and cognitive processes, but also torturing and/or killing at the speed of light without leaving any evidence.
To raise awareness and inspire reflection among the public on these human rights violations committed non-consensually and covertly on innocent civilians.
To stimulate the debate at the European and world level, forming a basis for international legislation and policies addressing the use of remote technology weapons and/or methodologies, including: thought reading and thought control technologies, directed energy weapons (DEW), gang stalking (a.k.a. organized stalking) and ensuring citizens’ protection.
To prompt recognition and acknowledgement of the stories of targeted individuals, instead of ignoring them and often labelling as ‘crazy’.
To engender independent investigations into mind-control experimentation related crimes.
More >
More to be added … All speakers
STAY UP TO DATE
Enter your email address and receive notifications on progress and changes.
Email*
Next >
FACEBOOK
Covert Harassment Conference on Facebook
RECENT VISITS
DONATE
While you are here please consider making a donation for a better world. Thank you.
– Donate to EUCACH >
– Donate to STOPEG >

To encourage everybody to look for the solutions to protect citizens against the crimes committed with the use of these remote technology weapons and/or methodologies and diligently promote the care for victims of stalking crimes who have limited resources or avenues for a safe environment.
SPEAKERS
The following persons have already acknowledged to speak at the conference:
– Magnus Olsson – Director of EUCACH – European Coalition Against Covert Harassment
– Peter Mooring – Founder of STOPEG Foundation – STOP Electronic weapons and Gang stalking – William Binney – NSA whistleblower
– Dr. Henning Witte – Founder of White TV, Sweden’s first uncontrolled medium
– Dr. Rauni Kilde – Medical specialist and advisor
– Mojmír Babáček – Writer, Czech Republic
– Alfred Lambremont Webre, MA, JD – Active with human rights and social justice
– John Allman – Founder of Christians Against Mental Slavery/BanMindWeapons.org
More to be added … All speakers PROGRAMME
The program is being finalized at the moment. Please see Programme.
ORGANIZATION
The Covert Harassment Conference 2014 is organized by:
European Coalition Against Covert Harassment (EUCACH)
www.eucach.org
STOPEG Foundation (STOP Electronic weapons and
Gang stalking)
www.stopeg.com
Copyright 2014 covertharassmentconference.com All rights reserved. Terms of use, Privacy statement 0,027,0,007,0,006,0,000

ggen
Meer Volgende blog» Blog maken Inlo
SteveLendmanBlog
New Radio Show
The Progressive Radio News Hour
Listen Live Sunday, Noon – 1:00 PM CT on PRN for cutting-edge discussions with noted guests on major world and national issues. Archived Shows
About Steve Lendman
Books by Steve Lendman:
TUESDAY, JANUARY 04, 2011
Electromagnetic Frequency Mind Control Weapons
Electromagnetic Frequency Mind Control Weapons – by Stephen Lendman
Directed energy weapons include lasers, high power microwave, and millimeter wave ones among others. A relevant December 2007 Department of Defense (DOD) report called them a “transformational game changer in military operations, able to augment and improve operational capabilities in many areas,” for both lethal and non-lethal purposes.
Access the full text through the following link: http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/ADA476320.pdf
Among other applications, EMF weapons/devices are used for harassment, surveillance and mind control. Agencies like the Pentagon, CIA and NSA use them to monitor people, manipulate their minds, harm, and at times kill them. The Navy Times called them the “most feared and controversial weapon(s) of (the) modern age.”
Human experiments in America go back decades, an earlier article addressed MK-ULTRA (and others), accessed through the following link:
http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2010/02/mk-ultra-cias-mind-control-program.html
Begun in 1953, it was the code name for a secret CIA mind control program to perfect a truth drug. It followed earlier WW II hypnosis, primitive drugs research, and the US Navy’s Project Chatter, identifying and testing drugs on both animal and human subjects. These and other experiments aimed to control human behavior through psychedelic and halluncinogenic drugs, electroshock, radiation, graphology, paramilitary techniques, and various psychological/sociological /anthropological methods, among others.
They comprised a vast open-field of mind experimentation, using anything that might work, legal or not on willing and unwitting subjects. For example, Dr. Ross Adey worked on the CIA’s Pandora Project, using microwaves to send signals to human brains. Cataloguing the results, he showed how they affected emotional and pathological states. He also learned that human brains could be controlled remotely through extremely low frequency modulated microwave beams, able to cause psychological and physical harm.
People could be turned in zombies, their minds easily controlled. Physical harm also resulted, affecting their blood, cardiovascular system, cells, central nervous and digestive systems, glands, metabolism, reproduction, eyesight, and hearing. In addition, subjects could be made suicidal or driven mad. Moreover, sounds and speech can be placed in victims’ brains, actual voices they can’t control or stop.
Other effects include unexplainable burning, itching, tickling or pressure; “humming” or “buzzing” causing sleeplessness and anxiety; loss of body control, producing sudden twitching or jerking of an arm or leg; and feelings of dread, rage, lust, sorrow, or other emotions that come and go quickly.
Moreover, microwave cooking can heat people to death by increasing the radiation field intensity, causing local hot spots in eyes, gall bladders, and other body parts. Paralysis can also be induced. Memories are erased or impaired. Cancerous cells can be produced, and behavior modified the way authorities wish, even turning people into killers, microwave signals directing them. The entire mobile phone network can be used for these purposes, yet people are unaware of what’s happening.
Post-WW II, human radiation experiments were conducted, affecting thousands of US citizens. Millions more were exposed to radioactive fallout from over 200 atmospheric and underground tests. At the Nevada site in the 1950s and 1960s, detonations affected over 200,000 ‘”atomic vets,” thousands more downwind also in Nevada, Utah, Colorado and New Mexico. These and numerous other physical and psychological experiments caused enormous harm to hundreds of thousands of unwitting people, victimized by their own country.
126
Flashpoint in Ukraine:
How the US Drive For Hegemony Risks World War III
Edited by and contributor Stephen Lendman
For more info including sales info see
Claritypress: Flashpoint in Ukraine:: How the US Drive For Hegemony Risks World War III
BANKER OCCUPATION
Waging Financial War on Humanity
By Stephen Lendman
For more info including sales info see
Claritypress: BANKER OCCUPATION: Waging Financial War on Humanity
.

How Wall Street Fleeces America:
Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War
By Stephen Lendman
This book provides a powerful tool for showing angry Americans how they’ve been fleeced, including a plan for constructive change.
For reviews, a synopsis, and Sales info, please click one of the following links: Claritypress: How Wall Street Fleeces America or Amazon.com
.
Electronic harassment and mind control technologies direct energy through lasers, radio frequency energy beams, holography, interferometry, electromagnetic radiation, radio and sound waves, satellites, radar, miniature electronic robots, smart dust, and other means. All do it invisibly over thousands of miles. They can penetrate walls, buildings, metals, concrete, mountains and thousands of miles of earth.
Intersecting energy beams create radiation pockets in victims, engineered to contain sound waves, messages, heat and pressure stress, simulated forms of electromagnetic radiation, telepathic images, as well as holographic and virtual reality simulations. Directed energy beams can also track, locate and target people harmfully. They can only be blocked by force fields or materials that absorb or deflect them. What they are remain top secret.
Bush I declared the 1990s “The Decade of the Brain,” an effort “to enhance public awareness of the benefits to be derived from brain research,” keeping its dark side hidden.
The Pentagon’s DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) conducted research and development in “augmented cognition,” what universities call “cognitive science.” It’s the interdisciplinary study of how information is represented and transformed in the brain. The Pentagon’s purpose was for military applications, including manipulating the emotions and behavior of adversaries.
Used globally, it’s applicable individually, for crowd control, or larger groups, using millimeter waves, pulsed energy projectiles, and high power magnetic weapons, subjects unaware of what’s hitting them.
The NSA’s Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) involves decoding EMF waves to tap into computers wirelessly and track people. Using EMF Brain Stimulation to monitor individuals, organizations and nations, it complements the CIA/Defense Intelligence Agency’s (DIA) Human Intelligence (HUMINT), and National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency’s Imagery Intelligence (IMINT). NSA’s DOMINT can track millions of people simultaneously. It can also inflict harm, control subjects psychologically and kill.
In conflict zones like Iraq and Afghanistan, “Project Sheriff” is used to give “troops working in urban terrain more options” against combatants and noncombatants alike. Humvees and armored personnel carriers have been retrofitted with non-lethal weapons, including microwave-like pain rays (an Active Denial System) and a Long Range Acoustic Device emitting earsplitting sounds.
Pulsed Energy Projectiles (PEPs) travel nearly at the speed of light. With pinpoint accuracy, they emit invisible laser pulses, electromagnetic radiation, stunning targets, knocking them off their feet, paralyzing them in pain. Their long-term effects, however, are unknown, including on the brain.
Voice to Skull directed acoustic devices are neuro-electromagnetic non-lethal weapons, able to produce mood-altering sounds in a person’s head. Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) uses satellite transmitted extra low frequencies (ELF) to send voice to brain communications. Long Range Acoustic Devices (LRADs) are used for crowd control. They produce 150-decibel acoustic beams, “designed to communicate with authority and exceptionally high intelligibility in a 15 – 30 degree beam.” They emit verbal challenges over distances beyond 500 meters, with warning tones to influence behavior. They can also inflict physical harm, manipulate minds, and cause death.
The field of Augmented Cognition includes Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), used therapeutically and for military purposes. The latter is to emit close proximity electrical impulses to the brain to affect mood, sleep patterns, and improve cognitive abilities in areas of learning, memory, attentiveness, visualization, and decision-making. The long-term neurological effects are unknown. The potential for human harm is considerable.
Transmitted over long distances, silent psychotronic weapons can cause illness or death for no apparent reason. In his 1970 book, “Between Two Ages,” Zbigniew Brezezinski, discussed technologies to conduct secret warfare, saying:
“It is possible – and tempting – to exploit, for strategic-political purposes, the fruits of research on the brain and on human behavior….Accurately timed, artificially excited electronic strokes could lead to a pattern of oscillations that produce
The Iraq Quagmire: The Price of Imperial Arrogance
By Stephen Lendman and J.J. Asongu
PREVIOUS POSTS
Progressive Radio News Hour Guests for January 6, …
Islamophobia in Western Media
Hail to the Thief: The New York Times Defends Mikh…
Haiti’s Elections: Illegitimately Recounting Fraud…
Hail to the Chief: Spinning Obama’s Presidency
America’s Gulf: New Report Says it’s Dying
Palestine Today: A Reality of Justice Denied
Israel Hardens Repression as Palestinian Recogniti…
America’s Gulf Disaster: Accidental or Deliberate?…

Obama Year Two: Continued Betrayal and Failure (Pa…
relatively high power levels over certain regions of the earth….In this way, one could develop a system that would seriously impair the brain performance of a very large population in selected regions, over an extended period.”
Most people know nothing about directed energy weapons, manipulating, incapacitating and killing many thousands who have no idea what hit them. America has been a longtime global offender, developing and using them for decades to surveille, harass, intimidate, manipulate, torture, and kill. They can also read minds and turn people into zombies. Why? To achieve total unchallengeable control.
So-called “non-lethal weapons” can be as harmful as killer ones. Ongoing research, in fact, is chilling. Waging war on human minds and bodies, it’s morally, ethically, and legally indefensible. Continuing, however, atrocity technologies are produced, mostly without public knowledge or that governments like America use them against their own people and others. For ill, of course, not good. Dr. Mengele lives.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.
posted by Steve Lendman @ 2:29 AM << Home About us Privacy Policy Advertising Contact Get Home Delivery RSS WEB TV Photo Gallery HOME NEWS BUSINESS INTERVIEWS FEATURES ARTS & CULTURE TRAVEL COLUMNISTS OP-ED EXPAT ZONE SPO Prime Ministry: telepathy may be involved in engineers’ deaths Engineer Halim Ünsem Ünal (back, L), who worked for ASELSAN and is believed to have committed suicide, is pictured with his family. (Photo: Cihan) August 05, 2013, Monday/ 17:31:00/ AHMET DÖNMEZ Share Tweet Share Print A A report the Inspection Board of the Prime Ministry has recently completed on the mysterious deaths of some engineers working for a Turkish defense industry giant, aselsan , maintains that the young engineers may have been driven to commit suicide after being exposed to telepathic attacks aimed at destroying them psychologically. Four engineers working for ASELSAN died in mysterious and consecutive deaths in the years 2006 and 2007. Following the initial probe conducted after the deaths of Hüseyin Başbilen, Halim Ünsem Ünal, Evrim Yançeken and Burhaneddin Volkan, the press reported that the unexpected deaths of the four engineers were believed to be suicides, but question marks about the deaths have lingered on, with the families of the victims usually skeptical about their suicides. Last year, the Inspection Board of the Prime Ministry launched a probe into the engineers’ deaths. After completing a one-year investigation into the incidents, the Inspection Board has drawn up a final report, which, after being presented to Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan this week, was also submitted to the Ankara Chief Prosecutor’s Office, which is in charge of the investigation. Despite previous claims in the media that the four engineers had worked on some important A RTS defense projects, “They were not working on critical projects,” the report said. One of the most striking things in the report is the suggestion that the four engineers may have been led to commit suicide after being subjected to telepathic attacks aimed to induce depression. In the report, inspectors also urged the Ankara Chief Prosecutor’s Office to investigate the deaths from this perspective. The report doesn’t provide a clear answer as to whether the deaths should be labeled as murder or suicide. After enumerating the findings about the deaths, the inspectors drawing up the report highlighted the fact that video images of the period immediately before the deaths, particularly in the cases of Başbilen and Yançeken, are needed, but as the deaths were seven years ago, it is no longer possible. All four engineers were undergoing psychological treatment before their deaths. But inspectors find it suspicious that, after Başbilen’s death, all three other engineers had, one after the other, started to undergo psychological treatment. The inspectors conceded in the report, however, that no connection between the four deaths has been found. Hüseyin Başbilen (31), a cryptology expert, was found dead in his car, with his throat and wrist cut, in Ankara on August 2006. Authorities announced that Başbilen, who had been married for two months, had committed suicide. Six months after Başbilen’s death, Halim Ünsem Ünal, 29, was found dead, shot in the head by a pistol belonging to his father, in his car. The death of Ünal, who was to be married in three days, was also recorded as suicide. Only eight days after Ünal’s death, another electrical engineer, Evrim Yançeken (26), lost his life, falling from the balcony of the apartment in which he was living with his parents in Ankara. About ten months later, Burhanettin Volkan, a software engineer, apparently committed suicide on October 9, 2007, with his own gun while on guard duty as part of military service. Volkan, who had started to receive psychological treatment before being enlisted, was married during his military service. He died only 40 days after being married. Initially, all four cases were closed after being labeled as suicides. But Fikret Seçen, the prosecutor conducting the Ergenekon investigation, an illegal gang charged with plotting to overthrow the government, referred the files of Başbilen, Yançeken and Volkan to the Ankara Chief Prosecutor’s Office in 2010. Başbilen’s case is particularly suspicious. In the report drawn up by the Security Directorate, the theory of Başbilen’s murder is given a higher probability by experts, while out of the eight members of the Council of Forensic Medicine (ATK), five said the Başbilen case was suicide, with three opting for murder. The investigation is still ongoing regarding the deaths of the ASELSAN engineers. Vehbi Başbilen, father of Hüseyin, wrote a letter to Erdoğan in August last year, saying he didn’t believe his son would have committed suicide. It was following this letter that Erdoğan instructed the Inspection Board to investigate the case. The Inspection Board examined almost everything, from the projects the four engineers worked on to the victims’ family life, psychological treatment they were receiving, trips abroad and files prepared by the prosecutor’s office. Members of the Inspection Board also talked with the families, the psychologists of the victims and with experts in telepathy. Keywords: aselsan , TSK  Recommend Start the discussion… Log In Tweet 7 1 Comments Community  Login Sort by Newest 1 ✉ Subscribe d Add Disqus to your site  Privacy National Other Titles HDP leader accuses government of inaction over violence in Southeast Suspect in HDP Diyarbakır election rally blast under arrest Turkish opposition likely to demand limits on Erdoğan’s role Pro-gov’t journalist threatens Kurds with new extrajudicial killings by ISIL CHP leader says early election just a loss of time, disrespect to nation Four dead after attack on Islamist group leader in southeastern Turkey Election of parliament speaker to test opposition’s resolve to take on AK Party Davutoğlu resigns in procedural step, stays in post until new govt formed Opposition resistant towards possible coalition with AK Party Down but not out: Turkish voters clip Erdoğan’s wings Prosecutor’s office objects to acquittal of 7 suspects in Balyoz case Ex-President Gül says coalition government preferable to early election Report: AK Party outlines 3 ’red lines’ for possible coalition allies Greenham Common http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/scalar_tech/esp_scalartech21.htm Rather than belabor the obvious, for when DOD develops a weapon it can be said with certainty that it will be tested and, if possible, where it would be useful to meet their goals; another example will put motives and, at least, one type of application in more realistic perspective. Women peace activists have kept an ongoing vigil at the periphery of the U.S. Air Force base at Greenham in England since 1981. They are protesting build-up of nuclear weapons. The U.S. Cruise missiles, which are nuclear warheads small enough to be mounted on the back of a truck called a launcher vehicle, arrived at the base in March, 1984. Since then the women in the encampment and members of the Cuisewatch network have insured that when the launcher vehicle and its convoy are taken out into the British countryside, the “dispersal exercises” aren’t as secret as the military intended them to be. The women of the network, non-violent activists, have been subjected to intense harassment in an effort to be rid of their presence. In the Fall of 1984, things changed dramatically; many, if not most of the women began suffering illness; and, simultaneously, the massive police and military presence at the base virtually disappeared, and new and different antenna were installed at the base. In a report prepared by Rosalie Bertell, commissioner for International Commission of Health Professionals for Human Rights, a non-governmental organization based in Geneva, Switzerland, the unusual patterns of illness ranged from “severe headaches, drowsiness, menstrual bleeding at abnormal times or post-menopausal, to bouts of temporary paralysis, faulty speech coordination and in one case apparent circulatory failure requiring hospitalization.” Other symptoms documented by peace activist Kim Bealy, who coordinates investigations into reports of illness at specific places around the base, included; vertigo, retinal bleeding, burnt face (even at night), nausea, sleep disturbances and palpitations. Psychobiological symptoms included lack of concentration, disorientation, loss of memory, irritability and a sense of panic in non-panic situations. The symptoms have virtually all been associated in medical literature with exposure to microwaves and most listed can be induced through low intensity or non-thermal exposures. Measurements were taken around the base by members of Electronics for Peace and by others. Strong signals, up to one hundred times the normal background level were detected on a number of occasions. In fact, signals ten times stronger than those felt to be emanating from normal base transmitting systems were found. The strongest signals generally appeared in the areas where the women Greenham Common. Page 1 of 4 said that they suffered ill effects. For instance, they were found to cover the women’s encampment near the “green gate” (gates to the base are designated by color), but stopped abruptly at the edge of the road leading to the gate. The strength of the signals were also found to reflect the activity of the women: e.g., they increased rapidly when the women started a demonstration. Visitors to the encampment, both men and women, reported experiencing the same types of symptoms and the same pattern of variation as the Greenham women. It may be revealing that British personnel who guard the perimeter of the base work very short shifts (two hours at a time) and only for two weeks. What else has been used against the women of Greenham Commons? If high frequency verbal transmissions are used in U.S. department stores and have a significant effect in meeting their security goals, it seems likely that the military would also exploit the same technology. What would such a message tell the women? “There is something wrong with this place, ‘I’ want to get out of here, ‘I’ don’t like it here…” Perhaps auditory transmissions would be simultaneous with the transmissions that were making them feel unwell. In a review prepared by National Bureau of Standards, Law Enforcement Standards Laboratory, for Nuclear Defense Agency, Intelligence and Security Directorate, use of low intensity microwaves was considered for application as a “psychological deterrent.” The report stated, “…microwave radiation has frequently been cited as being responsible for non-thermal effects in integrated central nervous system activity. The behavioral consequences most frequently reported have been disability, listlessness and increased irritability.” The report fails to mention just as frequently cited low intensity microwave health effects as, chromosome damage congenital birth defects autonomic nervous system disregulation, including disruption of bio-cycles impaired immune function brain damage and other neurological abnormalities, including leaks in the blood brain barrier and depletion of some neurotransmitters among a host of other health impairments not to be taken lightly A reckless form of biological and psychological control has been perpetuated whether the source of the symptoms of the Greenham Commons is radar surveillance aimed at the women, or if there is conscious application of the microwaves as a “deterrent” or a means to Greenham Common. Page 2 of 4 drive the women away. Calculated efforts were also directed at preventing or eroding community support. In the summer of 1985, women planning to visit the camp had to be notified that long term health effects might ensue for women who were pregnant or intended to be. As activist Kim Bealy put it, “It would now appear that we are protecting the missiles by killing people slowly.” Health complaints similar to those of the women at Greenham Common are being made by women peace activists at Seneca, New York, and from activists at other locations. The symptoms at Greenham seem to occur on an occasional basis now, perhaps due to the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty, which applies to the missiles housed there, or due to somewhat increased public or congressional awareness. It is not necessary that the transmission take place from equipment in the vicinity of a target (although the Greenham women seemed to be suffering from transmissions made from within the base.) Propagation of microwaves has been very well studied and is very sophisticated, e.g., a two inch beam can be sent from a satellite, point to point, to a receiving dish on earth; and, it was reported in 1978, that the CIA had a program called Operation Pique, which included bouncing radio signals or microwaves off of the ionosphere to affect the mental functions of people in selected areas, including Eastern European nuclear installations. In the U.S. the military has intentionally obfuscated discussion of environmental health effects. With their ally “industry” they have won, at least for the time being, the right to perpetuate their interests, to the detriment of the public’s best interests. Scientists who have spoken up on the environmental impact of military microwave or electromagnetic systems have been treated as security risks, and have had their funds cut, so great is the military’s concern in protecting their communications systems by ensuring themselves unlimited use of radio frequencies or microwaves. The upshot is that in the U.S. at this time, there is no legally enforceable microwave standard. There never has been an enforceable standard for the public or the workplace. Microwaves at intensities within the suggested “guideline” have finally been shown, even by U.S. research, to cause health damage. Worse, some industrial exposures are extraordinarily high. For instance, plastic sealers, a low income group comprised mainly of women within childbearing years, use equipment that exposes them to over 10,000 microwatts of microwaves or radio frequencies throughout an eight hour day, and in some case, to hundreds of milliwatts. As energy absorbed from their equipment flows to ground, so much heat has been felt in the ankles of some workers that they have learned to do their tasks with their feet elevated on plastic. They are not provided metal shielding as workers are in more health conscious countries. While most of the public are only exposed to very low levels of microwaves and radio frequencies, a considerable number (between one and two percent) live or work near emitters, such as radio and television transmitters, military Greenham Common. Page 3 of 4 and airport radar, and industrial tools utilizing these frequencies. Therefore, it is likely that they are exposed to levels that have been proven to be unhealthful or downright dangerous. Greenham Common. Page 4 of 4 News Sport Weather Shop Earth Travel More Home Video World UK Business Tech Science Magazine England Regions London London Sonic device deployed in London during Olympics By Gavin Thomas BBC News 12 May 2012 London The Ministry of Defence has confirmed a sonic device will be deployed in London during the Olympics. The American-made Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) can be used to send verbal warnings over a long distance or emit a beam of pain-inducing tones. The equipment was spotted fixed to a landing craft on the Thames at Westminster this week. The company deny it is a weapon and say it can be used to “peacefully resolve uncertain situations” The manufacturer denies it is a weapon and the MoD said it would be used “primarily in the loud hailer mode”. A spokesman for the San Diego-based LRAD Corporation said the 1000Xi was “an effective long range communications system that broadcasts focused, highly intelligible, multi-language messages, instructions and warnings over distances up to 3,000 metres to peacefully resolve uncertain situations”. Royal Marines operating in patrol craft from HMS Ocean are also heavily armed with conventional firearms. The piercing beam of sound emitted by the device is highly directional. Some versions of the LRAD are capable of producing deafening sound levels of 150 decibels at one metre. But the device, which was used this week during Exercise Olympic Guardian, can also be used to broadcast verbal warnings, such as ordering crowds to disperse. LRAD Corporation has previously sold the device to the US Army, which deployed them in Iraq for crowd control. London 2012 – One extraordinary year The BBC’s home of 2012: Latest Olympic news, sport, culture, torch relay, video and audio They have also been bought by the US Navy and Air Force as well as a number of police forces worldwide. It has been successfully used aboard ships to repel Somali pirates. The panel-shaped LRAD is mounted onto steerable gimbals and said to be far more efficient than a normal loudspeaker. A Ministry of Defence spokesman said: “As part of the military contribution to the police-led security effort to ensure a safe and secure games, a broad range of assets and equipment is being used by our armed forces”. “This includes the LRAD (Long Range Acoustic Device) which will be deployed during the Olympic Games primarily to be used in the loud hailer mode as part of the measures to achieve a maritime stop on the Thames.” The LRAD spokesman said: “LRAD systems are far superior to bullhorns, which have limited range and poor sound quality. “LRAD systems enable homeland security and law enforcement personnel to communicate safely and clearly to individuals on land or water and assist in keeping high profile events safe for all participants.” Share this story About sharing More on this story ‘Social cleansing’ housing benefit cap row: Duncan Smith hits back 24 April 2012 Google profits from illegal ads Surveillance: A Most Unreasonable Search and Seizure Michigan Passes Anti Electronic Harassment Law Including Life in Prison click here to return to emhdf.com Home | Documentary: The Weather Underground | Human Being Used As Surveillance Device | Michigan Passes Anti Electronic Harassment Law Including Life in Prison | Surveillance & Dr David Kelly’s Death | Human Rights Destroyed By Military Justice and Extradition | Fabricated Intelligence | Cataract Surgery 9th June 2003 Resulting From 58 Months of Surveillance Technology | Abuse of Power for £36 Million | A Truly Unreasonable Search and Seizure | Shut Down Overview 3rd & 6th July 2002 | Shut Down Effort 27/28th July 2002 | Shut Down Effort 9/11th August 2002 | J’accuse: Crimes Against Humanity | US National Security Breach: Email to DIRNSA | Attempted Murder By Poisoning And Camp X-Ray | Direct Interference With Medical Care | Surveillance Overview and Table of Contents | Letter to the Prime Minister | Correspondence to My Member of Parliament – Abuse of Power I | Correspondence to My Member of Parliament – Abuse of Power II | Crime and Corruption: Tenant Management I | Crime and Corruption: Tenant Management II | Crime and Corruption: Tenant Management III | Child Abuse Reporting and Harassment | Personal Injuries | Sleep Deprivation Logs | Human Rights Act of 1998 | Protection from Harassment Act 1997 | Links | Search Links This page was last updated on Monday, 8th March 2004. For the first time about which I am aware there is the recognition that electronic and electromagnetic radiation devices can be used as destructive weapons. Michigan has recognised this in its Penal Code effective 1st January 2004 by including such devices. In keeping up with technology used to harass and terrorise Michigan has enacted a law updating terrorism and harassment by all current means including electronic or electromagnetic. This criminalises such unlawful purposes as intending to actually harm or imitate such intention in order to frighten, terrorise, intimidate, harass, injure or kill any person. This also applies to property damage. The criminal penalties are quite severe starting at prison sentences up to 15 years for just doing this, up to 20 years for property damage, up to 25 years for personal injury, life for impairment of a bodily function and life without parole in the event of death. To cause a false belief of being subjected to this has a penalty including up to five years in prison. Under this law those carrying out the electronic and electromagnetic terror and torture campaign against me 24/7 for years would be liable to life in prison for having destroyed my eyesight. There are other impairments of bodily functions and personal injuries as well as property damage. Given this explicit passage of a law in the State of Michigan in the US effective 1st January 2004 recognising the great harm which can be done by such devices and activity it is amazing that this is allowed to be carried out freely without penalty in the UK. What is even worse is that the Government is doing this to me and has been behind this activity 24/7 for 66 months since the end of August 1998. The intent to cause personal injury and death has been clear by both verbal statements and actions. I have been threaten with a bomb: “I’ll get a bomb and blow him out of there.” This was witnessed by someone whom I believe was connected with the police who subsequently verified that this threat was made on another occasion. There are explosives included in this law. Is the legislation base of this country [UK] already second class? This is in reference to the statement this week in the UK by the Lord Chief Justice that the new Supreme Court proposed by the Labour Government will be second class because it will not be able to determine the constitutionality of laws, and it will not be independent. I have excerpted the parts of the Michigan law below which apply to electronic and electromagnetic devices. This is Public Law 256 2003 and 257 2003. Go to: http://www.michiganlegislature.org/mileg.asp?page=PublicActs and enter the above law number and year information for the full law. Michigan Public Law 256 2003 THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE (EXCERPT) Act 328 of 1931 750.200h Definitions. Sec. 200h. As used in this chapter: (e) “For an unlawful purpose” includes, but is not limited to, having the intent to do any of the following: (i) Frighten, terrorize, intimidate, threaten, harass, injure, or kill any person. (ii) Damage or destroy any real or personal property without the permission of the property owner or, if the property is public property, without the permission of the governmental agency having authority over the property. (k) “Harmful electronic or electromagnetic device” means a device designed to emit or radiate or that, as a result of its design, emits or radiates an electronic or electromagnetic pulse, current, beam, signal, or microwave that is intended to cause harm to others or cause damage to, destroy, or disrupt any electronic or telecommunications system or device, including, but not limited to, a computer, computer network, or computer system. (m) “Imitation harmful substance or device” means a substance or device that is designed or intended to represent 1 or more of the following or that is alleged to be 1 of the following but that is not any of the following: (vii) A harmful electronic or electromagnetic device. (n) “Serious impairment of a body function” means that term as defined in section 58c of the Michigan vehicle code, 1949 PA 300, MCL 257.58c. (o) “Telecommunications system” means that term as defined in section 219a. History: Add. 1998, Act 207, Eff. Oct. 1, 1998 ;–Am. 2001, Act 135, Imd. Eff. Oct. 23, 2001 ;–Am. 2003, Act 256, Eff. Jan. 1, 2004 . © 2004 Legislative Council, State of Michigan Michigan Public Law 257 2003 750.200i Unlawful acts; penalties THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE (EXCERPT) Act 328 of 1931 750.200i Unlawful acts; penalties. Sec. 200i. (1) A person shall not manufacture, deliver, possess, transport, place, use, or release any of the following for an unlawful purpose: (d) A harmful electronic or electromagnetic device. (2) A person who violates subsection (1) is guilty of a crime as follows: (a) Except as provided in subdivisions (b) to (e), the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 15 years or a fine of not more than $10,000.00, or both. (b) If the violation directly or indirectly results in property damage, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 20 years or a fine of not more than $15,000.00, or both. (c) If the violation directly or indirectly results in personal injury to another individual other than serious impairment of a body function or death, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 25 years or a fine of not more than $20,000.00, or both. (d) If the violation directly or indirectly results in serious impairment of a body function to another individual, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for life or any term of years or a fine of not more than $25,000.00, or both. (e) If the violation directly or indirectly results in the death of another individual, the person is guilty of a felony and shall be punished by imprisonment for life without eligibility for parole and may be fined not more than $40,000.00, or both. History: Add. 1998, Act 207, Eff. Oct. 1, 1998 ;–Am. 2003, Act 257, Eff. Jan. 1, 2004 . © 2004 Legislative Council, State of Michigan Michigan Public Law 257 2003 750.200l Acts causing false belief of exposure; violation; penalty THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE (EXCERPT) Act 328 of 1931 750.200l Acts causing false belief of exposure; violation; penalty. Sec. 200l. (1) A person shall not commit an act with the intent to cause an individual to falsely believe that the individual has been exposed to a harmful biological substance, harmful biological device, harmful chemical substance, harmful chemical device, harmful radioactive material, harmful radioactive device, or harmful electronic or electromagnetic device. (2) A person who violates subsection (1) is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 5 years or a fine of not more than $10,000.00, or both. History: Add. 2001, Act 135, Imd. Eff. Oct. 23, 2001 ;–Am. 2003, Act 257, Eff. Jan. 1, 2004 . © 2004 Legislative Council, State of Michigan Copyright 1996 – 2004 by Gary D Chance All rights reserved Permission to reproduce and distribute electronic copies free of charge is hereby granted provided that it is reproduced accurately and that the source and copyright status of the material is made evident to users, but a printed copy or copies or a copy or copies distributed for financial gain is forbidden. Microwave hearing – by Mark Rich http://www.newworldwar.org/microwavehearing.htm Microwave hearing is a scientific fact. Existing radar units can be modified to transmit a beam of pulsed microwave energy into a person’s skull which causes sounds such as ticks, buzzes, hisses, knocks, chirps, and words. The sounds, which originate from within, above, or behind the head, are transmitted to the inner ear via bone conduction. There is no external noise. It can be applied at a distance of at least hundreds of meters. Man- portable transmitters allegedly exist. Despite some of the relatively recent announcements that this is possible, according to other mainstream reports, it has been around in some form since at least the early 1960s. Two notable contributors to the early development of microwave hearing include Drs. Allan Frey and Joseph Sharp. In his 1962 report, Human Auditory System Response to Modulated Electromagnetic Energy, which appeared in the Journal of Applied Psychology, Dr. Frey described how microwave hearing was demonstrated using a microwave transmitter that projected sound several hundred feet. The transmitter used pulse-modulated waves at extremely low average power levels. The transmission was immediate. The system was wireless and receiverless, and the sounds were even heard by the deaf. Then in the mid 1970s, Dr. Sharp helped to develop microwave hearing technology for DARPA by conducting research at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR). In 1973 Dr. Sharp proved that the correct modulation of microwave energy could result in the wireless and receiverless transmission of audible speech. In 1976 it was reported by the Los Angeles Herald-Examiner that the Soviets were also conducting extensive research into microwave hearing that was brought to the attention of the US Defense Intelligence Agency. Words which appeared to be originating within a person’s skull, they reported, could be induced by microwaves. The technology was to be used for antipersonnel purposes. The October 1998 US Patent 4877027—Hearing System, mentioned that sound could be induced in the head of an individual using microwaves in the range of about 100 MHz to 10 GHz. The waves consist of frequency modulated bursts lasting from about 500 nanoseconds to 100 microseconds that create a sense of hearing in the individual whose head is targeted. It is effective regardless of a person’s hearing ability. Others patents pertaining to microwave hearing, such as the August 1989, US Patent 4858612— Hearing Device, and the July of 2003, US Patent 6587729—Apparatus for Audibly Communicating Speech Using the Radio Frequency Hearing Effect, are based on similar scientific principles. In July of 2008 New Scientist announced that Sierra Nevada Corporation planned to build a microwave gun able to project beams of sounds directly into people’s heads. The weapon, which is based on the microwave audio effect, will be used by the military. Wired’s February 2008 story, Microwave hearing – by Mark Rich. Page 1 of 3 Pentagon Report: Nonlethal Weapons Could Target Brain, Mimic Schizophrenia, described how microwave weapons which create voices in people’s heads are not only possible, but have already been demonstrated. Most researchers from the mid 1960s into the early 1990s have concluded that bone conduction (thermal expansion) is the physical mechanism that allows for microwave hearing. The detection of microwave hearing is the same in humans as it is in other mammals. Bone conduction is just a secondary pathway for sound transmission in humans and most other mammals. Bone conduction works basically in the following way: Upon hitting the skull and interacting with the soft tissue in the head, a microwave signal in the range of about 2.4 MHz to 10 GHz is down- converted to an acoustic frequency of about 5 kHz.1 This acoustic energy launches a thermal acoustic wave which is sent to the inner-ear by conduits of soft tissue that extend from the skull to the bony portion of the inner ear. Once it reaches the inner ear, it activates the cochlear where the regular process of hearing occurs. Although the increase in tissue temperature which causes the acoustic wave is rapid, it is small because the pulse only lasts milliseconds. Therefore, there are no known harmful biophysical effects. The sound produced by the transmission is immediate. It is noticed from within, behind, or above the head. According to some researchers, an individual’s ability to hear this type of sound depends on them being able to hear above 5 kHz.2 People with hearing loss above 5 kHz may not perceive these types of sounds as well as those with regular hearing up into the 15 kHz range. Also, because these are low-intensity sounds, a quiet environment is required in order for them to be heard. Microwave hearing is a well-established phenomenon, the basis for which extends back to at least the early 1960s. According to the US military, some uses for microwave hearing include establishing a private message transfer, and disrupting people who are not aware that the technology exists. NATO and the US Army consider microwave hearing to be a NLW.3 Dr. Robert Becker, author of multiple books and a nominee for the Nobel Peach Prize, mentioned that microwave hearing could be used to drive a person insane. “It would be pure terror,” agreed Dr. Nick Begich. The use of this technology, says the US Army in its Bioeffects of Selected Nonlethal Weapons document, could be “psychologically devastating.” Sources Next Endnotes 1 An abstract from the 2007 Health Physics, The Radiation Safety Journal article, Hearing of Microwave Pulses by Humans and Animals, written by James C. Lin, says that the frequency range for the microwave transmission can be from hundreds of MHz to tens of GHz. The transmission frequency could be in the range of about 100 MHz to 10 GHz according to the October 1998 US Patent 4877027―Hearing System. Microwave hearing – by Mark Rich. Page 2 of 3 2 According to some sources, people with hearing loss above 5 kHz either can’t hear these sounds or have difficulty hearing them. See the 2003 Motorola Florida Research Laboratories article, Auditory Response to Pulsed Radiofrequency Energy, by J.A. Elder and C.K. Chou, as well as the 2001 article Acoustic Weapons Prospective Assessment, by Jurgen Altmann from Volume 9 of Science and Global Security. However, Dr. Frey’s tests concluded that the deaf could hear them. Also, the October 1998 US Patent 4877027―Hearing System mentioned that microwave hearing could be perceived by individuals regardless of their hearing ability. 3 For the most part, the DOD is now transmitting microwave hearing attacks from the second I awake until I go to sleep. These computer-generated attacks consist of basically the same phrases. They are synchronized with thought patterns, other DEW attacks, and environmental stimuli. Periodically, new phrases are used, seemingly to promote recent themes. See the Human-Computer Intelligence Network and My Experience chapters in the Appendix for more on this. Copyright © 2011 Mark Rich. All rights reserved. Mark (at) NewWorldWar.org Microwave hearing – by Mark Rich. Page 3 of 3 http://www.newworldwar.org/ MICROWAVE MIND CONTROL by Tim Rifat UK INTELLIGENCE FORCES AND MICROWAVE MIND CONTROL MIND CONTROL As a scientist researching into microwave weapons used on the general public, evidence that the GM900 microwave network as used by Vodaphone and British Telecom, is a major health hazard, has come to my attention. Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) documents entitled: Biological Effects Of Electromagnetic Radiation (Radiowaves and Microwaves) Eurasian Communist Countries, show that microwave frequencies similar to those of the cellular phones can cause health problems in the following areas: Blood. Cardiovascular System. Cells. Central Nervous System. Digestive System. Glands. Metabolism. Reproduction. Visual System. Internal Sound Perception. Equipment to test the frequency and intensity of microwave phones shows that they produce signals similar to microwave ovens. Two Vodaphone cellular phones were producing 100mW/cm2 and 50 mW/cm2 respectively. The danger level for microwave ovens is 5mW/cm2 and the Russians regularly used 10 mW/cm2 for weapon research. These Vodaphones will therefore cause significant health problems if used. A variety of cell phones can be tested to see how dangerous they are. The GM1800 system used by Orange uses higher frequency microwaves. Australian scientists found this caused cancer in mice exposed to radiation of this type. The documents in my possession show that microwaves pass deeply into the body and can have a negative effect on the brain and body. The DIA research dates from 1976 and shows the dangers were known about over twenty years ago. The Soviets used the frequencies and intensities used by mobile phones, 1800 MHz and 900 MHz, as weapons. It is a rule of the intelligence community that you hide things in plain view, getting the public to accept microwave mind control weapons which effect their behaviour under the guise of mobile phones was a stroke of genius. Getting the public to pay for these microwave mind control devices, so their brains and behaviour can be damaged, to make them more docile and easy to control, was pure diabolical genius. UK INTELLIGENCE FORCES AND MICROWAVE MIND CONTROL Microwave weapons that turn people into stressed, confused, submissive zombies are being used in Britain’s inner cities. Developed by the communists, microwave weapons similar to microwave ovens have since the 1980s, been targeted on inner city council estates. These weapons transmit extremely low frequency (ELF) signals which mimic natural brain waves; at the flick of a switch, all the people around these microwave transmitters are turned into submissive zombies who cannot think clearly, become depressed, apathetic and want to lounge around all day doing nothing: the inner city malaise found on Britain’s streets. With the advent of new ELF detectors designed by the author’s research teams, the mass mind control of the metropolitan UK population can be proved. ELF signals are officially only found at nuclear submarine communication stations, so the researchers were shocked to find microwave and UHF, mind control signals in city centres, the author’s flat, being sent through mobile phones, the BT telephones and from the numerous transmitters that dot the country. The massive increase in mobile phones has enabled the UK security forces to use this network of transmitters to beam mind control signals into the brains of anyone living near these transmitters. Microwave phones use pulse modulated microwaves of the correct intensity to pass through the skull into the brain and control behaviour. Microwave transmitters are therefore the perfect medium for the transmission of ELF signals to mind control the UK population. Researchers are of the opinion that the inner city riots of the early eighties forced the Thatcher regime to deploy ELF mind control devices developed in the 1970s to turn the working class housing estates into total policing zones. In these zones, ELF transmitters turned the inhabitants into docile zombies. So successful was this technology that it was expanded to cover all major towns. Mass mind control of the UK public to make them submissive and obey authority was expanded, hand-in-hand with the mobile phone network and military and police microwave transmitters. Now the entire London conurbation is covered by UHF and microwave carrying mind numbing ELF. Research into the use of microwave weapons and their use for mind control began in 1950s at the Tavistock Institute, one of Britain’s leading psychiatric research establishments. The UK institute was researching into ways of mind controlling the British population without them knowing. The monkey submission response, whereby the dominant monkey caused submissive behaviour in the underlings, was the brain state of most interest to the British scientists. Having found this specific brain rhythm for docile submissive, zombie-like behaviour, it was then recorded and used as the template for the ELF signal beamed on UK microwave transmitters. Britain was the first discoverer of microwave technology, used for radar, in the 1940s and therefore had a commanding lead over everyone else in this field. The 1970s brought a darker side to the story, with the news that the Russians were microwaving the US embassy in Moscow. One third of the staff eventually died of cancer from this microwave irradiation. Australian scientists proved in 1997, that tiny amounts of microwave produced by the very safest mobile phones, cause cancer in mice, when exposed to this radiation. Greenham Common was the first time that the Ministry of Defence was involved in the offensive microwaving of women protesters, the so called Greenham Common Women. This event showed that the UK security forces were willing to use lethal doses of microwave radiation on large groups of the general public. Equipment showed that the women peace protesters were subject to high levels of microwave radiation, some of them have subsequently died from cancer. Northern Ireland would have been a perfect proving ground for mass mind control technology. Research at the Tavistock institute enabled the Thatcher government to put into large scale use, the frequency which causes submission in humans. Radiating this ELF frequency on microwave transmitters, cellphones, BT phones and by use of other transmitters, the inner city population can be behaviourally controlled. My research group have ELF detectors, which can prove all manner of UK transmitters are being used to mind control the population. Since ELF is not found naturally, and is only used for nuclear submarine communication, its presence proves mind control weapons are being used on the general public. The author also has access to scientific documents showing the devastating effects of ELF broadcast by microwave, UHF and VHF on humans. It is alleged that Marconi put this microwave technology into full scale production, and around thirty scientists and military personnel on the project who began to ask questions committed `suicide’ under mysterious circumstances. My research has found that microwave weapons are targeted on middle class troublemakers and researchers who cause problems for the establishment. Russian and American research has found that pulse modulated microwaves (as used for mobile phones) can, when modulated with ELF which mimics specific brain patterns change the behaviour of the victim at the flick of a switch. It has been found that UK security police, such as MI5 use the 450 MHz frequency used for this research (legally allowed to be used by the police) for behavioural control. A vast catalogue of mind control frequencies in the MHz range, FM radio, TV and mobile phone frequencies, have been measured, which are used in the UK for mind control and killing or disabling victims: 147, 153, 197, 199, 447, 453, 456, 466, 853, 883, 884, 887… Symptoms can be depression, befuddled thinking, loss of memory, stress, not being able to cope, manic behaviour, schizophrenia, nervous breakdowns, physical collapse, brain and nervous system damage, heart attacks, cancer… An example was Brighton police van, parked outside the Brighton Pavilion which was used to beam UHF and microwaves at vagrants to clear them from the area. All Brighton’s city centres are bombarded with microwaves when vagrants congregate to make them so ill they have to flee. The Evening Argus newspaper asked the police if the white van which was parked in the Brighton Pavilion grounds for months, was their van, they replied it was one of their ‘surveillance’ vehicles. On Wednesday, 4th of February the author was passing Brighton Police station with a frequency counter which detects microwave weapons, and I detected a 452 MHz microwave beam being directed at two young offenders sitting on a wall opposite the station. I confronted the police with the reading, Robert Galloway, spokesperson for the police stated, “they were not interested in microwaves even if they were a danger to health.” The author has uncovered widespread use of microwave weapons in Brighton by the police and MI5 as a test programme to clear vagrants from the city centre. Contacting researchers in this field of enquiry, they all complain of microwave-like symptoms, headache, nausea, giddiness, eye damage, ear problems… Readings I have taken show that the 750-1000 MHz range is used by the intelligence services for inducing nervous and physical collapse. Microwave ovens give off 1000 MHz. On the Channel 4 programme, For the Love of…New World Order, shown on Monday night at 12pm, on April 6th, the author revealed some of these facts on television. The presenter, and researchers of this programme complained of severe headaches in the days preceding filming symptomatic of microwave attack. As the foremost non-military expert microwave weapons, remote viewing (psychic spying) and Psi-warfare, the author became aware of the microwave problem when he was targeted to stop his forthcoming book on remote viewing being released. This book on psychic spying, published by Century Books, is the first book by a scientist on the subject of Psi-warfare and the techniques the superpowers developed. Subsequent to the filming of the Channel 4 programme, he was arrested by Brighton Police on February I5th outside their building and his frequency counter was confiscated to stop him recording the use of microwave weapons around the police station and in public places around the town. Even though no law was broken. It appears Brighton Police are worried that their use of microwave weapons on Brighton’s vagrants is coming to light. The UK government has also bought up all the readily available frequency counters, these being the Watson FC-128 frequency counters, and the Optotronic devices, and the manufacturers now market a ‘modified’ model, which most probably has a digital filter so that the microwave weapon frequencies given above, cannot be shown. The author’s frequency counter has still not been returned. With such high-level manipulation of events it seems that microwave mind control is part of a secret policy which is being practised on the general public in this county. As part of a covert government policy of harassing and disabling critics, this means of attack is not covered by the law and highly deniable, the perfect intelligence device for civilian control. The author’s flat is targeted with a 900 MHz beam which seems to be designed to cause massive neurological damage and produce tumours. The BT phone network has the potential to be used for docilisation of the UK public. A 30-40 MHz signal is carried by the phone. When the earpiece is placed against the head, bone conduction carries the ELF component into the brain of the phone user. A ELF signal which can effect behaviour or health is therefore passed into all BT phone users. It appears from experts I have consulted on the subject that the digital phones have been designed to carry this mind control carrier frequency. Vodaphone have supplied a mobile phone to a friend of mine that pumps out an 847 MHz signal at over 100 mW/cm2, this is equivalent to 4×100 watt lightbulbs being turned on in the body of the user. This means that mobile phones can potentially be used to kill or so disable a person they no longer become a problem to the establishment. Another Vodaphone tested pumped out 50 mW/cm2. UK safe levels for microwave ovens are 5 mW/cm2 – which are not held near the head. There are reports by military researchers that 1 mW/cm2 will cause swelling of nerve cells exposed to microwave. It is obvious that a total policing of the population by means of UHF, VHF, and microwave EM radiation, amongst others, is being used to keep the UK population in a docile and submissive mental state. Mental confusion can also be added to the signal for working class inner city areas to keep them docile and confused. A land of stultified zombies, who are mind controlled to make them docile and unable to think clearly. Subversives are habitually targeted with microwaves to drive them mad or make them fatally ill On July 4th 1976 seven giant transmitters in the Ukraine, powered by the Chernobyl nuclear facility, pumped a 100 megawatt radio frequency at the West, which contained a 10 Hz ELF mind control frequency. According to a US scientist, Dr. Andrija Puharich, MD, the soviet pulses covered the human brain frequencies. With a Dr. Bob Beck Andrija proved that the Soviet transmissions were a weapon. He found that a 6.66 Hz frequency would cause depression and an 11 Hz signal would cause manic and riotous behaviour. transmissions could indeed entrain the human brain, and thereby induce behavioural modification populations can be mind controlled en masse by ELF transmissions. More importantly he found that an ELF signal could cause cancer at the flick of a switch. It did this by modifying the function of the RNA transferases so that amino acid sequences are scrambled and produce unnatural proteins. MIND CONTROL Torture is alive and well in the UK. MI5, the UK’s secret police, regularly use Non-Lethal Weapons on any dissidents. Since MI5 have a well documented history of hating the Labour Party, and were instrumental in bringing down the Labour Prime Minister Harold Wilson, they naturally took to spying on, and discrediting, any group or person who did not follow their rabid right wing dogma. When Margaret Thatcher became Prime Minister of a right wing Conservative Government in 1979, she soon saw the power in recruiting MI5 to be her own secret police. During the Miner’s strike in the early eighties, Arthur Scargill and his National Union of Miners nearly brought the Conservative Government down, with their year long strike. Margaret Thatcher used MI5 to spy on the Miners and to discredit Arthur Scargill. Leading police officers argued against the use of MI5 on the civilian population, they were ignored or replaced – if they proved too vociferous. Margaret Thatcher was the first Prime Minister for many a year to sit in on the Joint Intelligence Committee’s meetings on a regular basis. Thatcher, as a trained scientist, would have been well aware of the usefulness of microwave weapons. They are impossible to detect unless you have a detector, dissidents have no idea these weapons exist, and best of all, they are totally deniable. It may be that MI5 kept this research secret from Margaret Thatcher, but the resources the UK has put into these fearsome, so-called non-lethal weapons, is extensive. UK intelligence runs a fleet of microwave weapon carrying vans, as well as portable microwave weapons that can be deployed near the dissident’s home. The vast expense can be disguised as communications equipment, for as we all know, microwave telephone communication is all the rage in our modern world. My research shows that the microwave telephone network also has the potential to be used as a major mind control weapon system to control the behaviour of the microwave phone users. Developed under the Conservative government, which was in power from 1979-97. The UK secret, or ‘black’ government, has at its disposal a fearsome array of mind control weapons. These abhorrent devices are euphemistically called ‘non-lethal weapons’ by the UK military. In fact they kill you slowly by causing: nerve damage, cancers, mental collapse leading to suicides, or tissue failure, such as heart attacks due to the cooking effect of microwaves. Precisely modulated microwave radiation is used to influence brain function. Human behaviour and reactions can be entirely controlled by using pulse modulated microwave EM radiation. Pulse modulated microwaves are useful as the carrier for the mind control signals as they are able to pass through the skull, which is rather resistant to low level EM. The massive number of microwave antennae that dot the country, some of which are used for the microwave phone network, all use pulse modulated microwaves, which makes their use for a strategic mind control device against the civilian population in times of trouble, or rioting, crucial to modifying the behaviour of the general population. In modern democracies it is no longer viable to shoot rioters, or torture dissidents by normal means, as the bad publicity is self defeating. Thus, microwave weapons have been developed by the UK’s military intelligence as they leave no marks, or gaping wounds. This pulse modulated microwave carrier beam can then be used to carry signals. These signals are extremely low frequency recordings of brain electrical potentials, which have been recorded by neuro-medical researchers such as Dr Ross Adey. Dr Ross Adey’s research at the Brain Research Institute of the University of California, was funded by the CIA. In their Pandora project a catalogue of different brain signals for specific actions, emotions and pathological states of mind were recorded. It was found that when microwaves were used to fire these signals at victims’ brains, they experienced the moods, behaviour, and the pathological states, carried by the signals. This meant that by mimicking natural brain frequencies, the human brain could be controlled remotely by use of extremely low frequency broadcast carried by pulse modulated microwave beams (ELF pulse modulated microwave remote mind control technology). It is now possible to broadcast mind control commands directly into the brain by use of microwave beams. All that is needed is a catalogue of every specific brain frequency for each: mood, action and thought. These catalogues of excitation potentials are available from Russian neuro-medical research institutes, so any one with enough cash can have the same technology at their disposal, as UK military mind control groups (the psychological-enforcement arm of MI5). The Aum sect bought microwave weaponry via their 50,000 Russian converts. Particular excitation potential, is then broadcast by pulse modulated microwave transmitter. This pulse modulated microwave beam has the ELF excitation potential frequency imprinted upon it. It was found that each behavioural set in humans had a distinctive frequency. There was one for: anger, suicide, hysteria, trauma, serial killing, paranoia, lust…etc. Intelligence operatives in the UK regularly park microwave transmitters outside targets’ houses and beam specific mood inducing excitation potentials at the victims. To aid them, they have sophisticated millimetre wave scanners to look through the victims’ walls, so they can see the targets’ in their homes. Pulse modulated microwaves are regularly directed at the victims’ brains, while other people in their homes are oblivious of what is going on. A leading conspiracy researcher, who looks into GCHQ at Cheltenham, found one of these vans, with two spheres on its roof parked in his road. When he took the number plate and through contacts checked who owned it, he found it was an MOD van. Hopefully he has found the microwave weapon system before it has done him too much harm. These microwave weapons were developed allegedly at Marconi. When firing microwave beams through walls at one specific target, every material in the way of the microwave beam attenuates or modifies the intensity and frequency of the beam. Since precise frequencies and intensities are needed for mind control, very sophisticated microwave arrays and computer programmes had to be developed so that the microwave beam could be changed in response to the materials which lay between the target and the weapon, as the victim moved around the house. To do this, the reflectivity and refractivity of the materials between victim and weapon had to be analysed in real-time and fed to a computer which could change the microwave array in concert with the changing environment between victim and weapon, as the target moved around his/her home. Secondly, there had to be an automatic interrupter if another person walked in front of the beam. The victim needed to be driven mad or disabled, without anyone else being aware that he or she was being targeted. The technology for this was very complex but eventually it was perfected. Twenty five or more scientists and military personnel, associated with the Marconi project, then died in mysterious circumstances. Intelligence personnel regularly kill people to keep them quiet. Maybe they killed the entire research team to keep such a diabolical weapon secret. For if it were made public, the scandal would bring down the government. Whatever the real story, by the mid to late eighties, all the problems had been ironed out and these new smart microwave weapons were deployed on the UK s streets. Northern Ireland would have proved the perfect place to test them out. Pulse modulated microwave weapons had now come of age. By this method, any mood or behavioural set, can be conditioned into the target’s brain. Intelligence agents keep a log of the victim’s behaviour to see if more intense ‘treatment’ is needed and as a guide for future mind control projects. It is alleged that by this method, UFO and conspiracy researchers, are routinely driven to commit suicide. having the excitation potential for suicide beamed into your brain day and night by microwave mind control weapons, soon resets the brain into a cycle of depression that spirals out of control ending in suicide. Many intelligence and technical officers in the UK, who have spilled the beans, or could be a potential leak, are driven to commit suicide by the special mind control teams run by MI5. If you look at the long list of UK military and intelligence experts who inexplicably commit suicide, one can see an underlying mind control logic that drives them to kill themselves. Behavioural reinforcement is used in a synergistic way with the mind control. It was found that the effect of the microwave beams could be greatly enhanced by external reinforcement. Intelligence community personnel destroy the target’s property, ruin their financial affairs spread vicious rumour, make sexual peccadilloes public knowledge – such as wearing women’s underwear, while checking oneself – with an orange in one’s mouth. External reinforcement of pulse modulated microwave mind control technology was found to be very effective. Intelligence chiefs are now in seventh heaven; if some one becomes a problem they get the ‘suicide mind control team’ parked outside their house. Within weeks, the victim kills himself. This is very pleasing to the intelligence mandarins, as suicides are easy to explain away – even if the victim was a highly placed politician or military man. If the military intelligence agency does not wish you to commit suicide, they can drive you mad. This is done by beaming the excitation potential of a particular pathological mental state at your brain while you are at home. To aid in this, the intelligence operatives can place sounds and speech in the target victim’s brain. This inter cerebral hearing is used to drive the victim mad, as no one else can hear the voices transmitted into the brain of the target. Transmission of auditory data directly into the targets’ brains using microwave carrier beams is now common practise. Instead of using excitation potentials, one uses a transducer to modify the spoken word into ELF audiograms, that are then superimposed on the pulse modulated microwave beam. Discrediting well known people who are causing problems for the shadowy elite, by driving them mad, seems to be standard operating procedure for the intelligence community. Victims are subject to pulse modulated microwaves which carry different types of madness and behavioural aberrations, encoded as ELF excitation potentials. This makes the troublesome high profile person, display manic or insane behaviour that discredits them. Examples of this technique are allegedly: David Icke, Fergie, Princess Diana… Outside environmental reinforcement, by use of media agents in league with MI5, makes it assured that the high profile person’s mind controlled madness, will be put in the worst possible light to discredit them. In this way, high profile subversives who cannot be wrongly imprisoned (unlike the Carl Bridgewater prisoners, Birmingham Six, Guilford Four…) in the normal way by Britain’s police, or killed by assassination squads, such as the Pegasus group, are made to look ridiculous. Public humiliation is the finest weapon the authorities have, to make harmless, a potential well known figure, who is causing trouble. If the VIP needs to be made temporarily ill, microwave beams containing the signal the brain gives off during a vicious bout of flu can be fired at the victim. This causes the target to display all the symptoms of flu, even though they have not caught the virus. Major Ed Dames, the remote viewing specialist, who has close links with the US secret military, alluded to this device on a US TV programme. The intelligence agents can also use low level microwaves to cause mental and physical confusion that leads to illness. Beaming microwaves at victims makes them fatigued, damages their immune system, causes neurological damage that effects their thinking, and ability to carry out tasks, induces premature ageing, cancer and cataracts. Sussex Police regularly use this low level microwave to clear drunks from city centres. While researching this matter, I was subject to high levels of microwave >10mW/cm2 whenever I approached their headquarters, whilst MI5 irradiated my home continually with microwaves. It seems that I touched a raw nerve while researching mind control weapon usage in the UK.
Organisations that irritate the authorities have their building turned into a ‘hot spot’ by microwave transmitters, so the staff all suffer sick building syndrome caused by microwave damage. Or the staff of the target organisation have their behaviour changed to cause discord. UFO Reality, a leading UFO and conspiracy magazine have complained of mysterious health problems, while another New Age group complained of eye damage, nausea and headaches brought on whenever they had a meeting, which may have been caused by microwaves.
Heating the victim to death, by microwave cooking is caused by increasing the field intensity of the radiation, to cause local hot spots in the victims’ eyes and gall bladder, which have poor circulation, so cannot carry away the heat.
Irradiating the optic nerve of the victim with the same signal that is sent to the brain by this nerve, causes the nerve tissue to overload. In this way, subversives can be blinded by the intelligence community without them knowing what has occurred. An American researcher complained of this problem to me and warned me that this weapon system was being used on my person by MI5.
Neurological research has found that the brain has specific frequencies for each voluntary movement called preparatory sets. When you pick up an object, there is a specific preparatory set for this action. By firing at your chest a microwave beam containing the ELF signals given off by the heart, this organ can be put into a chaotic state, the so called heart attack. In this way, high profile leaders of political parties, who are prone to heart attacks, can be killed off -before they cause any trouble. Neil Kinnock’s Labour government was allegedly cheated out of an election victory by postal vote rigging in twenty key marginal seats. When a new even more electable Labour leader was found, it is rumoured that John Smith, the then Labour leader, was prompted to have a fatal heart attack, while walking in the country with his family, by means of a concealed microwave device which operated on the Vagus nerve to bring about a massive heart attack. Since MI5 have a long history of naked hatred toward the Labour Party, there may be some truth in the above, though no hard evidence has yet been found.
Paralysis can be induced in the target by use of this method of broadcasting preparatory sets encoded on microwave beams. A pulse modulated microwave beam, carrying an ELF signal, which is identical to the one in the motor neurone centre of the brain, is used to jam the victim’s motor co-ordination. This is analogous to radar jamming, using a more powerful signal at the same frequency to swamp out the enemy’s radar. Motor neurone preparatory set
potentials are jammed by a bigger signal carried by a microwave carrier beam,
that literally overloads the brain, so it cannot control the body. Pulse modulated microwave weapons which broadcast the ELF preparatory sets of the motor cortex at the victim, will paralyse the victim without killing them. Breathing and heartbeat are involuntary actions controlled by another set of frequencies in another part of the brain.
This technique can be used to abduct people for secret government mind control experiments, under the guise of alien abduction. A microwave beam of this nature will paralyse the victim, so they can be bundled into a black helicopter and airlifted away for experimentation.
Once the procedure is complete, hypnosis can be used to plant false memories of alien abduction. In this way, real alien abductions can be used by the authorities to enable them to obtain a limitless supply of guinea pigs for their mind control experiments.
Real memories of government involvement are erased electronically. This technique clears all short-term memories from the victim’s consciousness by broadcasting microwave beams at the target which carry the signals used for memory retention. When you remember something, it is first stored in your short-term memory. After approximately twelve hours, this short-term memory is converted in the brain to long-term memory, after which you remember this information for the rest of your life. If this conversion from short-term memory to long-term memory does not occur, the data is lost. We all see details around us, but try to recall the decor in a restaurant you ate at some weeks ago and you will see how tenuous memory is. Microwave radiation of a specific frequency can interfere with the transfer of memories from short to long-term memory. Microwave radiation of a specific frequency can interfere with the synapses of the brain. By interfering with the connections between brain cells, memory of people can be disrupted. In this way, Seal special forces assassins can be brain wiped after a mission, so they have no idea of the target they killed. Using hypnosis, false memories can then be planted in the brain, so the gap left by the real memory is papered over.
The latest advance in electronic mind control were discussed in my previous articles in Nexus, but for those who missed the ESP of Espionage, this equipment uses special types of microwave beams called MASERs. These are the laser equivalent of microwave beams. These MASER beams have been used to develop something called synthetic telepathy. This is the ability to read peoples’ minds from a distance. Electronic scanning of victims’ brains by monitoring the electromagnetic (EM) emissions from peoples’ brains and using amongst other things, the brain waves (as measured on an EEG), to read the victim’s subvocalised thoughts.
Head of US Special Forces Major-General Schaknow, talked about synthetic telepathy during a lecture in July 1992 at Fort Bragg North Carolina. The US military is hard at work perfecting synthetic telepathy. In synthetic telepathy, the weak electromagnetic signals in the brain associated with subvocalised thought, are connected to a computer by use of electrodes, or in more advanced mechanisms by MASER beams. Sophisticated computer systems have learnt to
read the subvocalised thoughts in the brain, by associating a specific brain
excitation potential, with a particular word. In this case, only one specific language can be decoded, as each word in a language has a specific set of frequencies that must be discovered. Once the donkey work of finding the specific frequencies for all the words in a language has been programmed into a super computer, which can carry out massive parallel processing, fuzzy logic software is used to match this with real world excitation potential associated with subvocalised thought obtained from thousands of abductees, who are used to calibrate the synthetic telepathy devices. GCHQ Cheltenham, the intelligence gathering arm of MI5, possess the advanced computer systems needed for synthetic telepathy.
Synthetic telepathy detects the l5Hz, 5 milliwatt auditory cortex brain emissions, that are linked with the excitation potentials in the brain associated with subvocalised thought. New technology, involving low frequency microwaves and RF, has enabled devices to be built which can scan through walls and look inside peoples’ bodies like X-rays. This enables security personnel to see a target in his own home and to track him throughout the house. Further to this, being able to see inside the victim’s head, would allow computer controlled targeting of specific brain centres in the victim’s brain, even when he was walking around the house.
A scan of the specific brain emissions given off when the victim subvocalises using an array of pulsed frequency MASERs fired at the specific brain centres of the subversive, while he resides in his own home, enables the victim to be scanned. By firing an array of ELF pulse modulated MASERs, which scan up
and down the window of frequency emissions given off by subvocalised thought, interference effects can be measured in the MASER beam. The victim’s ELF brain emissions will interact constructively or destructively with the pulsed frequency MASER carrying ELF in the ELF window associated with subvocalised thoughts. If we fire an array of pulsed MASERs, which are out of phase with each other, extraneous noise can be filtered out in the digital domain. Since the converging ELF modulated MASERs are being effected by the low level emissions in the victim’s brain, the shifts in the ELF pulsed signal going into the subversive’s brain can be detected. A simplistic version of this would be the LASER beam shone at the window of the person that is being bugged. The vibrations in the window cause modulations in the LASER that can be converted into electrical signals and hence into sound. In this way the subvocalised thoughts in the victim’s brain can be read. Having already built up a library of excitation potential signatures for differing words and groupings of words, a sophisticated computer can begin to decode the emission signatures into word streams. In this way the subvocalised thoughts of the victim can be stored in the memory of a supercomputer and analysed to give a read out of what the target is thinking..
Using ELF audiograms carried by a single pulse-modulated Maser, subvocalised thoughts can be placed in the victim’s brain. This enables UK synthetic telepathy operators the ability to enter into conversations with the subversive to drive him mad or to bring up key words which will get the victim thinking about the information they wish to find. Visual cortex excitation potentials can also be
broadcast into the victim’s brain so that illusory images can be projected into
their brain to drive them mad, or to programme them to commit suicide.
My research has led me to uncover a truly nation-wide mind control weapon system. Each UK police station is equipped with a vast array of microwave antennae. The Sussex Police headquarters has a two hundred foot antenna. The building is surrounded by a fence and is off limits to the public. This microwave complex sits in the middle of a council housing estate, which means the people in this area are being bathed in low level microwaves. New research has shown that low level microwaves give mice cancer, since the emitters tested by the scientists, were the new ultra safe mobile phones which give of much smaller intensities than the police antennae, the Police microwave system is a serious health hazard. It seems that low level microwave radiation excites the hydrogen bonds in the cell and can interfere with meiosis. This causes cell division to go wrong, which leads to cancerous cells and hence tumours.
Secondly, the police have been granted the exclusive use of the 450 MHz microwave frequency range. This is exactly the frequency used by Dr Ross Adey, the CIA mind control expert, in his experiments on behavioural modification. It seems the police have the exclusive use of this mind control frequency and a vast array of antennae to broadcast this frequency all over the country. Very useful for mass mind control in times of emergency. Adey found that by using
0.75mW/cm2 intensity of pulse modulated microwave at a frequency of 450 MHz, it was discovered that an ELF modulation could be used to control all aspects of human behaviour. The Sussex police headquarters is connected to CCTV, closed circuit television cameras throughout the town. Some of these cameras have microwave telemetry devices that could easily be used to broadcast this frequency. The large antennae that bracket the town could also be used.
The most insidious aspect of this, is that the entire mobile phone network could easily be used to control the behaviour of the phone users. By use of my microwave detector, I have found that mobile phones of the newer type, give off
a pulse modulated microwave signal of around 0.75mW/cm2 at the earpiece. This may be coincidence, but it is exactly the intensity required form behavioural control as found by Dr Ross Adey, the pioneer of microwave mind control. So in theory, an ELF signal could be added to the microwave network to feed a precise behavioural pattern into every mobile phone user in the UK. If their were widespread riots, the ability to broadcast behavioural stimuli to mollify all the mobile phone users in the country would prove useful. Since mobile phone users are generally middle class, it means authority has a useful method of controlling the behaviour of the key voters. Microwave carrier beams are perfect for transmitting the excitation potential of docility to the phone user to keep them servile in times of trouble. When no ELF signal is broadcast the phone acts in a completely different manner on behaviour in humans. In this case the microwave phones causes the neurones to release calcium ions which makes the user tired irritable and when stresses likely to emotional outbursts such as road rage.
In Brighton, the local MI5 headquarters has a large microwave array on its roof.
Secret bunkers in the area also have large microwave arrays above them. It is
child’s play to transmit an ELF modulated signal to be broadcast by the entire mobile phone network – if need be. By this means the entire mobile phone users can be behaviourally modified. At the cost of developing cancer from low level microwave exposure from the phones they constantly use, stressing the neural network by constant calcium ion efflux and interference with bioelectric fields.
It seems strange that a few milliCuries of ionising radiation will get the National Radiological Protection Board excited, whilst high intensity cancer inducing non ionising microwave radiation, goes unchecked. So high are levels near transmitters, that litter the countryside, that light bulbs will explode near them. If the intelligence community is using microwaves on a large scale as mass mind control weapons, then the NRPB’s silence is easily explainable. To add to this, the numerous microwave detectors that were cheaply available to check leakage from microwave ovens are no longer made by any company in the country. It seems the UK authorities do not want the population to be able to detect when they are being microwave.
In conclusion, it can be seen that the UK intelligence and police, have a dizzy array of high-tech mind control devices. They regularly target their own populations and thousands of people are made ill by microwave weapons. With the advent of synthetic telepathy, ‘CCTV of the mind’ becomes a reality.
With the election of a New Labour government unaware of microwave weapons and untainted, as they had no part in their development and deployment, it is certain that Tony Blair’s government will outlaw these abhorrent microwave weapons – as they have done land mines. The only problem will be convincing the Labour government that MI5’s microwave communication equipment is in fact microwave mind control weaponry. With the total secrecy the MI5 organisation operates under, one can be sure they will be mendacious as to how their £200 million pound budget is used to hone their leading edge microwave mind control torture weapons that are used on the public. Even more disturbing is the use of EMP and microwave weapons by the police on anyone researching into this area.
REFERENCES ELECTRONIC MlND CONTROL
[1] Non-Lethality: John B Alexander, the Pentagon’s Penguin, by Armen Victorian, Lobster June 1993. This is an excellent article on the US black government’s ‘hard-man’ of the mind control world -recommended for those who really would like to know how these people think and work.
UFO Reality No 1-3, Jon King, Mind Control.
Mind Control and UFO’s, by Alex Constantine, Feb 1996.
[2] UFO Reality No 4.
[3] Enigma Vol 2, It’s All In The Mind, T Rifat.
[4] Ross W Adey: Neurophysiologic Effects of Radiofrequency and Microwave Radiation, Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, Vo1.55 No 1 1, Dec 1979; The Influences of Impressed Electrical Fields at EEG Frequencies on
Brain and Behaviour, in Behaviour and Brain Electrical Activity, Burch, N and
Altshuler, H.I., eds, Plenum press, 1975; Effects of Modulated Very High Frequency Fields on Specific Brain Rhythms in Cats, Brain Research, Vol 58, 1973; Spectral Analysis of Low Frequency Components in the Electrical Activity of the Hippocampus During Learning, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol 23, 1967.
Dr Ross Adey, formally of the Brain Research centre at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, now at Loma Linda University Medical School, Loma Linda, California. He worked on the CIA Pandora Project and was concerned with inducing specific behaviour modification by electromagnetic means as well as induction of calcium efflux events to interfere with brain function – the so called ‘confusion weaponry’.
C.S. Blackman is a researcher who worked in the US on theoretical research that underlies the electronic RMCT devices now deployed world-wide. Electronics World and Wireless World: The healing face of electromagnetic fields; 1993.
[5]. Martin Cannon, The Controllers.
[6]. Secret and Suppressed, Jim Keith.
[7]. Psychic Dictatorship in the USA, Alex Constantine.
[8]. Encounters, Vol 7, Psi Spies, Marie-Louise Small. Cosmic Top Secret: America’s Secret UFO Program,1992 William Hamilton III.
[9] Encounters, Vol 10, Room with a Remote View, by Richard Forsyth. This is an article about the author. http://www.fastnet.co.uk/pms ; Paranormal Management Systems’ web site. For an information pack on RV/RI, send £3 plus a SAE to PMS, PO Box 2749, Brighton, BN2 2DR, UK. Correspondence and normal courses are available, phone 01273 690424 to book for courses. We also offer consultancy on mind control problems.
Nexus Vol 3 No 6, Remote Viewing: The ESP of Espionage, by T Rifat. Nexus Vol 4 No 1 The Esp of Espionage, Part 1, by T Rifat.
Nexus Vol 4 No 2, The Esp of Espionage, by T Rifat. These three articles cover the theory of RV, RI and ESP in very great detail. recommended for the serious RV/RI student. For more information contact the author.
Alien Encounters No 1 1 Alien and Government Mind control, T Rifat. Sightings Nol2, Losing Your Mind! Mind control Technology, by T Rifat. UFO Reality No 8, Mind Control, Big Brother Is All In The Mind, T Rifat. Enigma 6, Mind Control, by T Rifat.
Fortean Times 95, Police State of Mind, by David Guyatt. US Synthetic Telepathy info supplied by David Guyatt.
Guyatt, David. “Some Aspects of Antipersonnel Electromagnetic Weapons (paper prepared for ICRC Symposium for the medical profession.

Silent GuardianTM Protection System
Less-than-Lethal Directed Energy Protection
Silent GuardianTM Protection System saves lives, stops aggressors, protects assets and is proven safe.
Bene ts
g Provides a zone of protection that saves lives and protects assets
g Minimizes collateral damage g Provides real-time ability to
establish intent and de-escalate aggression
g Does not cause physical harm; prevents injury and death
g Provides precise effects at a longer range than current less-than-lethal systems
g Fills the gap between shout and shoot
Silent GuardianTM employs millimeter wave technology
to repel individuals without causing injury. This capability enables users to stop, deter and turn back adversaries without the use of lethal force. The system also disrupts an assailant’s ability to effectively use a weapon. Silent Guardian provides extraordinary tactical ability to control outbreaks of violence, minimize collateral damage and ultimately
saves lives.
The system’s antenna emits a focused beam of millimeter wave energy. The beam travels at the speed of light and penetrates the skin to a depth of 1/64 of an inch, producing an intolerable heating sensation that causes the targeted individuals to instinctively ee or take cover. The sensation ceases immediately when an
individual moves out of the beam or the operator steers the beam away. Silent Guardian does not cause injury because of the shallow penetration depth of the millimeter wave.
Substantial government testing has been conducted to characterize the effects of millimeter waves on the human body. These tests have con rmed the technology’s safety and have established there is a signi cant margin between safe and harmful exposure levels.
The system can be operated across a broad range of scenarios, including maritime and desert environments. Silent Guardian has been sealed for dust and supports operations in conditions up to 125 degrees Fahrenheit ambient. The antenna is capable of
sustaining multiple bullet holes with minimum system performance degradation
and is also protected from environmental damage caused by rain, dust and salt fog.
Silent Guardian is easily transportable on standard military tactical vehicles and can also be integrated into combat vehicles. The system’s magazine is only limited by fuel availability.
Silent Guardian is designed, developed and manufactured by Raytheon Company. Raytheon is the only company producing this millimeter wave capability. The system is available now and ready for action.

Silent GuardianTM Protection System
1/64”

Stationary ring position with 360-degree coverage.
Easy-to-use joystick control with auto-tracking capabilities.
Penetrates skin to 1/64th of an inch.

The focused collimated beam allows precise targeting of speci c individuals.
Images courtesy The Defense Visual Information Center
Raytheon Company
Missile Systems
Directed Energy
P.O. Box 11337 Tucson, Arizona 85734-1337 USA 520.794.9340 phone 520.794.7915 fax
www.raytheon.com
Various applications for law enforcement, facility protection and homeland security.
Silent GuardianTM Speci cations Height
AC/DC Converter Transmitter Unit Transmitter with Antenna
45 in 83 in
74 in 94 in
Antenna
System Characteristics
Range: Targeting:
System Setup:
Mission Pro le:
Contractor Support:
Stationary ring position with 360-degree coverage
Integrated sensors with joystick control
Single-man operation
Automatic target tracking
Modular architecture
Secure antenna stabilization platform – able to operate in 40 mph winds
Less than 2-second retargeting capability Shoot-and-scoot capability
Less than 2 seconds to switch from standby mode to armed
Complete logistics support package available to include:
• Return and repair maintenance
• System training
• Web-enabled supply support
• Supports Army two-level maintenance system
Military applications, including checkpoint security, perimeter and point defense, force protection and peacekeeping missions.
Width
65 in
95 in
136 in (level)
147 in (maximum inteference)
45 in2
Greater than 250 meters*
Length
Weight
3,870 lb 6,440 lb
*The Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate has stated that the long-range active denial systems (ADS) are effective beyond small-arms range, typically up to 500 meters.
The Raytheon-funded mid-range Silent Guardian ADTS’ range is greater than 250 meters.
Cleared for public release. Copyright © 2006 Raytheon Company. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. RMS 6/06 4K 60345R

Targeting the Human with Directed Energy Weapons
Dr. Reinhard Munzert
6. Sept. 2002
New arms threaten and destroy lives in strange ways. Directed energy weapons are among th high-tech arms of the century. They hurt and kill with electromagnetic power. Microwave weap can be aimed at computers, electronical devices and persons. They have strong physical and psychological effects and can be used for military and terrorist activities. These weapons are part of crimes (in Europe) that almost nobody knows except the victims and the offenders. Unt now they make the perfect crime possible. No doubt, these weapons have a terrible future.
Key Points
Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) DEW and Crime
Perfect Crime?
DEW and Terrorism
Topic 1
Manipulated Microwave Oven Magnetrons and Generators Intelligent Antenna Systems
Topic 2
Anti-Electronics Weapon Anti-Personnel Weapon Psychological Effects
Topic 3
DEW and Crime
License to Kill
Perfect Crime
Mental Strength & Fighting Back
Topic 4
DEW as Terrorist Weapon Unseen Terror Attack Prevention and Protection
Summary
New Threats and Dangers Crime and Terrorism Recognizing and Knowing
[home] www.mikrowellenterror.de createt on May
7, 2003
e ons
also il
Prevention and Elimination Future Weapon! -Terrible Future?
MICROWAVE WEAPONS New Technology in Crime Activities and Sources
There is a new, effective weapon for criminals and terrorists. Law-breakers often misuse mod technology. Through the illegal usage of innovative high-tech weapons, people are not ”shot”, rather their living quarters are bathed in (high frequency) electromagnetic waves for a length o time. Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) are mostly intended for military purposes (U.S. Air For Russian and Chinese armies). High-tech company Raytheon states about DEW: ”We believe are a critical element of how ultimately wars will be fought. HPM (High power microwaves) is t most mature right now” (in Fulghum & Wall 2002).
The renowned German newspaper “DIE WELT” acknowledges microwave weapons as arms 21st century. In another German newspaper, Süddeutsche Zeitung, a weapons expert has recommended the police to procure microwave (MW) weapons for police use. Considering wh certain criminals know about MW weapons, they have a significant advantage over the police now. This puts the victims in extreme danger.
A primitive variation of a MW weapon would look like this: A microwave oven from the kitchen the protective shielding removed from the door and replaced by a metal funnel. And then the waves can get through walls (Pictures 1, 2, 3).
The effects of the MW beam on the victims include extreme weariness, headache, irregular heartbeat, diarrhea, painful testis, damaged nervous system and internal organs, burned skin eye damage. Later effects include blindness, heart attack, stroke and cancer. In the last mont some victims, cancerous tumors have been diagnosed.
In addition to that, victims (through intrigue and defamation) are seen as psychotic and dange thus, they are completely helpless. At the same time, the new weapons (for certain contractor are tested under ordinary circumstances and constantly improved.
HPM crimes are a new kind of crime with some very new characteristics. The International Un of Radio Science emphasizes in a resolution of 1999 on Criminal Activities using Electromagn Tools: “The fact that criminal activities using electromagnetic tools can be undertaken covertly anonymously and that physical boundaries such as fences and walls can be penetraded by electromagnetic fields.”
Expert Pevler stresses: “The development of high-power microwave (HPM) weaponry, and its proliferation into subversive organizations, offers the means to commit the ‘perfect crime’. HP attacks typically leave no residual evidence and their effects can range from nuisance to catastrophic” (1997).
The HPM-weapons that the high-tech gang uses supply continous or pulsed waves over long periods of time – especially in the night – from cars or vans or buildings around the target/pers They use magnetrons, microwave-generators, amplifiers, integrated systems. In addition they apply through wall imaging methods. There are already over 40 known victims in Germany, so of them even have been attacked while in hospital. But the police doesn’t understand these n
ern
f
ce, they
he
of the
at until
with
and hs by
rous; s)
ion etic
and
M
on(s).
me ew
weapons.
Besides this the criminals use tactics of information warfare: Know all about the victims, let them know nothing about you, information dominance, disrupt the communication systems of the victims.
The criminal network has at its deposal plentiful first class technical know-how and high quality equipment. That assures high efficiency and precision strikes and enables to operate from cars or vans. The MW generators/transmitters can be camouflaged in an attaché case or hidden in a small suitcase.
Only through cooperative work between electronic specialists and physicists have we been able to shine a revealing light on this special high-tech criminal activity. For experts: The (pulsed) waves of two or more transmitters [MW generators] interfere in the target zone, and through that, strengthen their effects. There are also parabolic antennas modified to transmitters. Besides this, intelligent (adaptive) antenna systems (numerous small transmitters connected, instead of few large ones; for example hidden in parked cars) will be used. Sometimes frequency hopping is employed. These methods work over several hundred feet, if everything is well adjusted.
We could find out where (electronic) components for highly potent MW weapons or whole systems (pictures 4, 5, 6) can be bought legally.
The criminals follow a double strategy: One way the victims are weakened, injured, tortured and intimidated. On the other side, the victims experience extreme, unbelievable things; almost no one can believe their reports. Most interpret the information from the victims as chimerical thinking. Some experts who work for the German Army or Nato know very well about MW weapons, but secrecy keeps them from talking too much about in public.
In several German cities there are complaints of serious physical injury. One attorney represents the interests of many victims. About 40 victims have built a community of interests. We are aware of many cases with amazing similarities that have been reported in the last few months. We have names and addresses of many victims and the cirumstances of the cases. We also have the names and addresses of some perpetrators.
In some cases, the lifestyles of the criminals are well known to us. Similar to terrorists, many pretend good citizenship or student lifestyles to cover their crimes. Conventional criminal activities, (i.e. burglary) are undertaken by normal gangsters or former members of the Stasi (which was the secret service of former GDR). In this network, they have division of labor and a support structure that includes foreigners as well.
Terrorists could use MW as anti-electronics weapons too. With HP microwaves, they can attack the electronics of computers, cars, airplanes and so on successfully [see the other papers of the Workshop W8]. They can use microwave weapons (radio frequency weapons) to damage electronic systems in an unseen attack with all those bad consequencies.
Additional points to be covered in the workshop: Detection of microwaves and protection against attacks.
All that has nothing to do with MW beam fright, but is criminal high-tech forced on the people. It is frightening that these weapons are being increasingly used by criminals and terrorists.
References/Sources:
Fulghum, D. A. (1999): Microwave Weapons Await a Future War. Aviation Week, 6/7/1999, p. 30.
Fulghum, D. A. (2002): Directed Energy Weapons To Arm Unmanned Craft. Aviation Week,
2/25/2002.
Fulghum, D. A. & Wall. R. (2002): Farnborough 2002: Raytheon Links Future To Network Prowess. Aviation Week, 7/19/2002.
Hecht, J. (2001): The Heat is on (Microwave beam weapon tested). NewScientist, 10/27/2001, p. 26.
International Union of Radio Science (1999): Resolution on Criminal Activities using Electromagnetic Tools. General Assembly, Toronto 1999. http://www.intec.rug.ac.be /ursi/Tor99ResolENG.htm.
Laukenmann, J. (2001): ”Hände hoch – oder es klebt!” Süddeutsche Zeitung, 9/25/2001.
Lövstrand, K. G. & Bäckström M. (2001): Intense Radio Frequency (RF) as a Tool for Graded Action. In: Non-Lethal Weapons. Hrsg.: Fraunhofer Institut Chemische Technologie.
Magdeburger Volksstimme (1999): Missbrauch elektromagnetischer Wellen durch Terroristen möglich. 10/8/1999.
Munzert, R. (2001/2002): Neue Technologie im Verbrechen – Mikrowellen-Waffen. Informationstexte an das Bayerische Landeskriminalamt, Bundeskriminalamt und andere Sicherheitsorgane. April 2001-march 2002, not published.
Nitsch, J. (1998): Gefahren erkennen. Wirkung von Hochleistungsmikrowellen. In: Elektromagnetische Verträglichkeit (EMV – ESD), Jahrgang 9, Ausgabe 3/98, p. 23- 26.
Nöldechen, A. & Dorra, B. (2001): “Europäer diskutieren über Mikrowellen und Laserstrahlen als moderne Waffensysteme”. Serie: Waffen des 21. Jahrhunderts, 3. Teil. DIE WELT, 9/25/2001, p. 31.
Pevler, A.E. (1997), Security Implications of High-Power Microwave Technology, www.infowar.com/civil_DE/civil_090597a.html-ssi
Schimmelpfennig, U. (1999): Strahlenkanonen für jedermann – Kein Schutz gegen Erpressung und Terror? Tv-Beitrag in Kontraste SFB/ARD, 11/18/1999.
Schwartau, W. (1996), Information Warfare, Second Edition, Thunder’s Mouth Press. Scott, W. B. (1999): ‚Beam‘ Weapons Edging Into Arsenal. Aviation Week, 7/5/1999, p. 53.
United States Air Force (1998): High Power Microwaves. Factsheet. http://www.de.afrl.af.mil /factsheets/HPMicro.html
United States Air Force (2001): High Power Microwave Division. Factsheets. http://www.de.afrl.af.mil/factsheets/HPM.html
Wall, R. (2000): Directed-Energy Threat Inches Forward. Aviation Week, 10/30/2000, S. 70.
Wilbers, A.T.M. et al. (2001): Susceptibility of COTS PC to microwave illumination. In: Non-Lethal Weapons. Hrsg.: Fraunhofer Institut Chemische Technologie.
Winkenbach, J. (2002): Mikrowelle als Nahkampfwaffe. Welt am Sonntag, Nr.1.1/6/2002, S. 12.
July, 2002
Dr. Reinhard Munzert, Germany, Erlangen
E-mail: RMunzert@t-online.de
Pictures
Picture 1: Manipulated Mircowave Oven
Picture 2: Microwaves going through walls
Picture 3: Book that describes the manipulation of a microwave oven to a ray weapon
Picture 4: Magnetron
Picture 5: Magnetron
Picture 6: Generator
Picture 7: Active Denial Technology
Picture 8: Neuronal Networks in the Brain © Dr. Munzert 2002
[home]

Writing The Snowden Files: ‘The paragraph
began to self-delete’
Was it the NSA? GCHQ? A Russian hacker? Who was secretly reading his book on Snowden while he wrote it, wonders Luke Harding
Luke Harding
Thursday 20 February 2014 16.20 GMT
One day last summer – a short while after Edward Snowden revealed himself as the source behind the momentous leak of classified intelligence – the Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger got in touch. Would I write a book on Snowden’s story and that of the journalists working with him? The answer, of course, was yes. At this point Snowden was still in Hong Kong. He was in hiding. He had leaked documents that revealed the US National Security Agency (NSA) and its British equivalent GCHQ were surveilling much of the planet.
Our conversation took place not in Alan’s office but in an anonymous sideroom at the Guardian’s King’s Cross HQ. Was Rusbridger’s office bugged? Nobody knew. But given the Guardian’s ongoing publication of sensitive stories based on Snowden’s files this seemed a reasonable assumption. Britain’s spy agencies were good at what they did. Thus the project to chronicle Snowden’s story began in an atmosphere of furtiveness. And perhaps mild paranoia.
I was part of a small team that examined Snowden’s documents in a secure fourth-floor room overlooking Regent’s Canal. Security was tight. Only a few trusted reporters were allowed in. Guards were posted outside. None of the laptops were connected to the internet or any other network. Cleaners were banned. Soon the room grew unkempt. Discarded sandwich packets and dirty coffee cups piled up.
Downing Street’s response to Snowden’s leak was initially slow – then strident. David Cameron sent his cabinet secretary Jeremy Heywood to visit the Guardian. Heywood demanded the return of Snowden’s files. And, in passing, suggested the newspaper was now itself under secret observation. “I wonder where our guys are?” he said, gesturing vaguely to the flats opposite. These interactions culminated with the Guardian, under threat of government injunction, smashing up its laptops in an underground carpark as two boffins from GCHQ watched. It was beyond the plot of any thriller.
There were curious moments in New York, too, from where many Snowden stories were reported. Within hours of publication of the first one – which revealed that the NSA was mass-scooping data from the US telecoms company Verizon – diggers arrived outside the Guardian’s loft office in Broadway. It was a Wednesday evening. They dug up the pavement and replaced it. The same thing happened outside the Guardian’s Washington bureau, four blocks from the White House, and the Brooklyn home of US editor-in-chief Janine Gibson. Coincidence? Perhaps.
In July I flew to Rio de Janeiro to interview Glenn Greenwald, the then Guardian columnist to whom Snowden entrusted his files. The trip was pleasant. My hotel overlooked Copacabana beach; from the rooftop I could watch the surf and Rio’s rich walking their dogs. Greenwald suggested we meet along the coast in the Royal Tulip hotel. We sat in the lobby. To our left a man with his back to us played with his iPhone; another individual lurked nearby. We shifted locations, twice. Eventually we hid in the business centre.
Greenwald’s response to this apparent stalking – by who exactly? – was good humoured. He seemed unfazed. The CIA’s station chief in Rio was known for his aggressive methods, Greenwald told me cheerfully. Weeks earlier an intruder had broken into the Rio home he shared with David Miranda and had stolen his laptop. (Nothing was on it.) I had been leaving my own laptop in the safe of my hotel room each day; returning from meeting Greenwald I found the safe would no longer lock.
I ventured out the next morning. My laptop was in the unlocked safe. (It didn’t contain any secrets; merely a work in progress.) A tall American immediately accosted me. He suggested we go sightseeing. He said his name was Chris. “Chris” had a short, military-style haircut, new trainers, neatly pressed khaki shorts, and a sleek steel-grey T-shirt. He clearly spent time in the gym. Tourist or spook? I thought spook.
I decided to go along with Chris’s proposal: why didn’t we spend a couple of hours visiting Rio’s Christ the Redeemer statue? Chris wanted to take my photo, buy me a beer, go for dinner. I declined the beer and dinner, later texting my wife: “The CIA sent someone to check me out. Their techniques as clumsy as Russians.” She replied: “Really? WTF?” I added: “God knows where they learn their spycraft.” This exchange may have irritated someone. My iPhone flashed and toggled wildly between two screens; the keyboard froze; I couldn’t type.
Such moments may, of course, have an innocent explanation. Still, back at my home in Hertfordshire I took a few precautions. I worked offline. I stored each draft chapter in a TrueCrypt folder, a virtual encrypted disk accessible only via a long, complicated password. When I conducted interviews I left my mobile behind. Having seen Snowden’s documents, I knew something of the NSA’s and GCHQ’s extraordinary capabilities. As of April 2013, the US spy agency had 117,675 active surveillance targets. Was I perhaps now one of them?
By September the book was going well – 30,000 words done. A Christmas deadline loomed. I was writing a chapter on the NSA’s close, and largely hidden, relationship with Silicon Valley. I wrote that Snowden’s revelations had damaged US tech companies and their bottom line. Something odd happened. The paragraph I had just written began to self-delete. The cursor moved rapidly from the left, gobbling text. I watched my words vanish. When I tried to close my OpenOffice file the keyboard began flashing and bleeping.
Over the next few weeks these incidents of remote deletion happened several times. There was no fixed pattern but it tended to occur when I wrote disparagingly of the NSA. All authors expect criticism. But criticism before publication by an anonymous, divine third party is something novel. I began to leave notes for my secret reader. I tried to be polite, but irritation crept in. Once I wrote: “Good morning. I don’t mind you reading my manuscript – you’re doing so already – but I’d be grateful if you don’t delete it. Thank
you.” There was no reply.
A month later the mysterious reader – him, her, they? – abruptly disappeared. At a literary event in Berlin my Guardian colleague David Leigh told a journalist about my unusual computer experiences; he led with the anecdote in a piece for the leftwing daily Taz. After that, nothing. I finished The Snowden Files: The Inside Story of the World’s Most Wanted Man in December.
In idle moments I wonder who might have been my surreptitious editor. An aggrieved analyst at the NSA’s Fort Meade spy city? GCHQ? A Russian hacker? Someone else intent on mischief? Whoever you are, what did you think of my book? I’d genuinely like to know.
Topics
Politics
Edward Snowden
The Guardian Newspapers & magazines Newspapers
More…
US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights
By Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton
As Study of the History of US Intelligence Community Human Rights Violations and Continuing Research in Electromagnetic Weapons
Completed December 2006
Sonoma State University Project Censored Media Freedom Foundation
1
Table of Contents
Research Statement American Ruling Class Neo-Conservatism Global Dominance Psychological War Telsa and EMF MK-ULTRA
Illegal Experimentation The Scientists
Exposure of MKULTRA EMF Weapons Research Project Sheriff
Pulsed Energy Projectiles Directed Acoustics Neurological Technology Implants
Expert Interviews: Valdimir Lopatin Carol Smith
Dean Radin
Nick Begich
DOD Military Contractors
Human Rights and EMF Testing Directed Energy Prof. Society Human Rights and Cognitive Liberty Total Surveillance
Conclusion
Appendix
Page
3
5
6
9
10
13
17
19
20
22
24
27
27
28
29
31
31
31
32
33
34
36
38
38
41
42
43
45
2
US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights
By Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton
This research explores the current capabilities of the US military to use electromagnetic (EMF) devices to harass, intimidate, and kill individuals and the continuing possibilities of violations of human rights by the testing and deployment of these weapons. To establish historical precedent in the US for such acts, we document long-term human rights and freedom of thought violations by US military/intelligence organizations. Additionally, we explore contemporary evidence of on-going government research in EMF weapons technologies and examine the potentialities of continuing human rights abuses.
In the 1950s and 60s the CIA began work to find means for influencing human cognition, emotion and behavior. Through the use of the psychological understanding of the human being as a social animal and the ability to manipulate a subject’s environment through isolation, drugs and hypnosis, US funded scientists have long searched for better means of controlling human behavior. This research has included the use of wireless directed electromagnetic energy under the heading of “Information Warfare” and “Non Lethal Weapons.” New technological capabilities have been developed in black budget projects1 over the last few decades— including the ability to influence human emotion, disrupt thought, and present excruciating pain through the manipulation of magnetic fields. The US military and intelligence agencies have at their disposal frightful new weapons, weapons that have likely already been covertly used and/or tested on humans, both here and abroad, and which could be directed against the public in the event of mass protests or civil disturbance.
Human Rights belong to people collectively. To believe in rights for some and not others is a denial of the humanness of people worldwide. Yet, denial is exactly what Congress and George W. Bush did with the signing of the Military Commission Act of 2006. The new official US policy is that torture and suspension of due process are acceptable for anyone the president deems to be a terrorist or supporter. This act is the overt denial of the inalienable rights of human beings propagated in our Declaration of Independence and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. More so, US actions declared to the world that the US suspends human rights for those it believes are evil.
The precious words, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness,” did not declare that only some men (and women) possess unalienable rights. Our independence was founded on the understanding that all men and women are recognized by this nation as having innate rights derived by their humanity.
Likewise, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, created by the United Nations in 1948, signed and ratified by the US Congress, specifies in its preamble that “recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of
1 Black budgets are government funded projects that are classified/secret to Congress and the American people. For an in-depth analysis on the topic, see Weiner, Tim , Blank Check: The Pentagon’s Black Budget, Warner: 1990.
3

freedom, justice and peace in the world.”
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights has been a guide for international law for most of six decades, and as such binds the United States to its general principles. Article 10 states that “everyone is entitled to full equality, to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him,” and Article 5 specifically prohibits torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Both of these basic human rights have been superceded by the passage the of Military Commissions Act of 2006.
Additionally, the Universal Declaration of Human rights declares that everyone has the right to freedom of thought and freedom of expression and opinion. This means that humans have the inalienable right to be able to freely think their own thoughts and discover their own truths. This paper addresses this most fundamental human right and explores the pending threats to individual freedom of thought posed by new EMF weapons technologies.
Freedom of thought or cognitive liberty is the natural human right of each person to be secure in their ability to perceive the world to the best of their ability. To have true cognitive liberty in a world as complex as ours would mean that first we must have access to truthful and unbiased information about the actions of others and the general state of the world. The Center for Cognitive Liberties defines this as “the right of each individual to think independently and autonomously, to use the full spectrum of his or her mind, and to engage in multiple modes of thought.”2 Without accurate representations we cannot make independently informed choices. It is imperative that the human body and mind be considered sacrosanct. To invade a person’s body without their consent is an egregious human rights crime.
The circumstance may soon arrive in which anti-war or human rights protesters suddenly feel a burning sensation akin to touching a hot skillet over their entire body. Simultaneously they may hear terrifying nauseating screaming, which while not produced externally, fills their brains with overwhelming disruption. Not only are both phenomena currently possible, but designs for more powerful EMF technologies receive continuous funding from the US Government.
We are in a time of extremism, permanent war, and the unilateral manifestation of ethnocentrism and power by a cabal of people in the US government. These power elites have been in operation for decades and are set on nothing less than the total US military domination of the world. They defy the foundational values of the American people to achieve their ends. This is not a new phenomenon. The repression of human rights has been present within the US Government throughout our history. 3
A long thread of sociological research documents the existence of a dominant ruling class in the US that sets policy and determines national political priorities. The American ruling class is complex and inter-competitive, maintaining itself through interacting families of high social standing with
2 See the Center for Cognitive Liberty at http://www.cognitiveliberty.org/
3 For a full discussion on the Global Dominance Group currently operating in the US see: http://www.projectcensored.org/downloads/Global_Dominance_Group.pdf
4

similar life styles, corporate affiliations, and memberships in elite social clubs and private schools.4
This American ruling class is self-perpetuating, 5 maintaining its influence through policy-making institutions such as the National Manufacturing Association, National Chamber of Commerce, Business Council, Business Roundtable, Conference Board, American Enterprise Institute, Council on Foreign Relations and other business-centered policy groups.6 C. Wright Mills, in his 1956 book The Power Elite, documents how World War II solidified a trinity of power in the US, comprised of corporate, military and government elites in a centralized power structure motivated by class interests and working in unison through “higher circles” of contact and agreement. Mills described how the power elite were those “who decide whatever is decided” of major consequence.7
With the advent of the military-industrial complex after World War II, President Eisenhower observed that an internal military industrial power faction was consolidating their long-term plans for the domination of America and, eventually, the world. Eisenhower was in no position to fight these men, and history records his feelings on the subject with the text of his short farewell address:
“….But threats, new in kind or degree, constantly arise. Of these, I mention two only…
…This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence – economic, political, even spiritual – is felt in every city, every Statehouse, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and
4 G. William Domhoff, Who Rules America? (New York: McGraw Hill, 2006 [5th ed.] and Peter Phillips, A Relative Advantage: Sociology of the San Francisco Bohemian Club, 1994, (http://library.sonoma.edu/regional/faculty/phillips/bohemianindex.html)
5 Early studies by Charles Beard in the Economic Interpretations of the Constitution of the United States (1929), established that economic elites formulated the US Constitution to serve their own special interests. Henry Klien (1933) in his book Dynastic America claimed that wealth in America has power never before known in the world and was centered in the top 2% of the population owning some 60% of the country. Ferdinard Lundberg (1937) wrote American’s Sixty Families documenting inter-marring self-perpetuating families where wealth is the “indispensable handmaiden of government. C.Wright Mills determined in 1945 (American Business Elites, Journal of Economic History, Dec. 1945) that nine out of ten business elites from1750 to 1879 came from well to do families.
6 See R. Brady, Business as a System of Power, (New York: Columbia University Press, 1943) and Val Burris, Elite Policy Planning Networks in the United State, American Sociological Association paper 1991.
7 C. Wright Mills, The Power Elite, (New York: Oxford University Press, 1956).
5

knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.
Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.
In this revolution, research has become central, it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.”8
We now understand that Eisenhower was referring to the conjunction of redirected tax monies to research secret new technology aimed at nothing less than increasing the controlling power of the military industrial elite to a global scale.
One particular faction of ambitious men, the former cold warriors and emerging neo-conservatives, were close followers of philosopher Leo Strauss. This elite group included not just generals and industrialists but philosophers, scientists, academics, and politicians have now become the most powerful public-private war organization ever known.
Strauss espoused an elitist philosophy that fawned over the characteristics of those who inherited wealth and lived lives of leisure to pursue whatever their interests may be. His ideas have been transformed into a cogent ideology in which the media, religion, and government are used to subdue the masses while the real “nobles” follow their own will without regard to the laws designed to control lesser men. Strauss was likewise fond of secrecy, as a necessity for control, because if the lesser men found out what was being done to them they would no doubt be upset.
“The people will not be happy to learn that there is only one natural right – the right of the superior to rule over the inferior, the master over the slave, the husband over the wife, and the wise few over the vulgar many.” In On Tyranny, Strauss refers to this natural right as the “tyrannical teaching” of his beloved ancients..9
Leo Strauss, Albert Wohlstetter, and others at the University of Chicago’s Committee on Social Thought receive wide credit for promoting the neo-conservative agenda through their students, Paul Wolfowitz, Allan Bloom, and Bloom’s student Richard Perle.
Canadian cultural review magazine Adbusters, defines neo-conservatism as, “The belief that Democracy, however flawed, was best defended by an ignorant public pumped on nationalism and religion. Only a militantly nationalist state could deter human aggression …such nationalism requires an external threat and if one cannot be found it must be manufactured.”10
8 Public Papers of the Presidents, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1960, p. 1035- 1040
9 Leo Strauss, “On Tyranny”, Edited by Victor Gourevitch and Michael S. Roth, University Of Chicago Press, 2000. 10 Guy Caron, “Anatomy of a Neo-Conservative White House,” Canadian Dimension, May 1, 2005.
6

The neo-conservative philosophy emerged as a reaction to the 1960s era of social revolutions. Numerous officials and associates in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush presidencies were strongly influenced by the neo-conservative philosophy including: John Ashcroft, Charles Fairbanks, Richard Cheney, Kenneth Adelman, Elliot Abrams, William Kristol and Douglas Feith.11
Within the Ford administration there was a split between Cold War traditionalists seeking to minimize confrontations through diplomacy and detente and neo-conservatives advocating stronger confrontations with the Soviet’s “Evil Empire.” The latter group became more entrenched when George H.W. Bush became CIA Director. Bush allowed the formation of “Team B” headed by Richard Pipes along with Paul Wolfowitz, Lewis Libby, Paul Nitze and others, who formed the second Committee on the Present Danger to raise awareness of the Soviet threat and the continuing need for a strong aggressive defense policy. Their efforts led to strong anti-Soviet positioning during the Reagan administration. 12
The Committees on the Present Danger (CPD) extend from the 1950s Russian threat to the present. The current CPD proudly boasts on their website;
“In times of great challenge to the security of the United States, Republicans, Democrats, and Independents have traditionally joined to make an assertive defense of American interests.
Twice before in American history, The Committee on the Present Danger has risen to this challenge. It emerged in 1950 as a bipartisan education and advocacy organization dedicated to building a national consensus for a strong defense against Soviet expansionism. In 1976, the Committee on the Present Danger reemerged, with leadership from the labor movement, bipartisan representatives of the foreign policy community and academia, all of whom were concerned about strategic drift in US security policy. With victory in the Cold War, the mission of the Committee on the Present Danger was considered complete and consequently was deactivated.
Today, the current CPD promotes radical Islamists as the primary threat to the American people and millions of others who prize liberty. They claim that the threat is global. They also claim that they operate from cells in a number of countries. Rogue regimes seek power by making common cause with terrorist groups. The prospect that this deadly collusion may include weapons of mass murder was the justification for the invasion of Iraq.”13
11 Alain Frachon and Daniel Vernet, “The Strategist and the Philosopher: Leo Strauss and Albert Wlhlestetter,” Le Monde, April 16, 2003, English translation: Counterpunch 6/2/03.
12 Anne Hessing Cahn, Team B; The Trillion-dollar Experiment, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, April 1993, Volume 49, No. 03
13 The Committee on the Present Danger mission statement can be accessed at http://www.fightingterror.org/whoweare/index.cfm
7

Journalist John Pilger recalls his interview with neo-conservative Richard Perle during the Reagan administration: “I interviewed Perle when he was advising Reagan; and when he spoke about ‘total war,’ I mistakenly dismissed him as mad. He recently used the term again in describing America’s ‘war on terror’, “No stages, This is total war. We are fighting a variety of enemies. There are lots of them out there. All this talk about first we are going to do Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq . . . this is entirely the wrong way to go about it. If we just let our vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely and we don’t try to piece together clever diplomacy, but just wage a total war . . . our children will sing great songs about us years from now.”14
There is ample evidence available to show that some individuals within government and industry have little problem with violating the public trust and using their positions to kill, maim, torture and destroy. It is of the utmost importance to our traditional American values of human rights and cognitive liberty that we recognize this threat from within. We must move to identify those who show these proclivities and ensure that their activities have adequate oversight.
Stanley Milgram’s famous experiment involving obedience to authority proved that individuals are fairly easily cowed into submitting to anyone who has a claim of authority, and that on average 61 percent of people will administer pain to another person if instructed to do so.15 Both test groups in these experiments rationalized their behavior by appealing to “the greater good.” Because it was for the “advancement of science” they were able to be convinced they should ignore personal judgment and obey the instructions given to them by the experimenters.16
Martin Orne, who was one of those paid by the CIA to conduct experiments on obedience, showed in 1962 that people would go to tremendous lengths to please a person in authority. Orne conducted research that involved presenting subjects with a stack of 2,000 pages of random numbers and instructing them to add each two adjacent numbers until he returned. Over 90 percent of the test subjects continued in this meaningless task for up to five hours.17
Today the combination of political climate and technological capability presents a condition in which widespread manipulation of, not only the flow of information through the media, but also the manipulation of the emotional states and cognitive ability in large populations could be achieved. If policy elites are unaccountable to the public for their actions, and the public has been emotionally manipulated to support them, we can assume that they will certainly abuse their positions in the pursuit of their agendas.
14 John Pilger, “The World Will Know The Truth,” New Statesman (London) (December 16 2002).
15 Stanley Milgram “Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View”, New York: HarperCollins, 2004.
16 “Obedience as a determinant of behavior is of particular relevance to our time,” Behavioral Study of Obedience, Stanley Milgram, Yale University, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 67, No. 4, p. 371
17 See Martin Orne-Orne, Martin T., “On The Social Psychology of the Psychological Experiment: With Particular Reference to Demand Characteristics and Their Implications,”Am. Psychol. 17 (1962): 776-783, Orne, M.T. The potential uses of hypnosis in interrogation. In A.D. Biderman (Ed.), The Manipulation of Human Behavior (pp. 169- 215). New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1961
8

Previous human rights and cognitive liberty violations are evidenced in CIA and FBI records pertaining to the infamous MK-ULTRA project and the grim record of harassment and subversion uncovered in the COINTELPRO program in force through the 1950s and into the 1970s. We also examined some of the cases of illegal experimentation on the public dating back to the 1930s. We consider, in depth, the forms of electromagnetic weapons entering the battlefield today that trace their origins back through the secret projects of the Defense Department in the 1950s and 1960s.
Psychological Warfare, Information War, and mind control may seem to be exotic topics, but the impact of these technologies and techniques is profound. Our minds are being impacted through a longstanding series of programs aimed at manipulating public opinion through intelligence agencies, think tanks, corporate media and a host of non-governmental organizations designed to engender fear, division and uncertainty in the public.18 Media manipulation involving the artificial framing of our collective reality is often a hit or miss proposition, but psychological operations have been carried out in the past, and are being carried out even today, through the practices of “Information Warfare,” directed at enemies abroad and at the American people.19
According to Mary C. FitzGerald of the Hudson Institute, New-concept weapons, such as laser, electromagnetic, plasma, climatic, genetic and biotechnological are the central principle driving the modernization of national defense. The potential for these weapons to be used for both good and bad deserves a great deal of attention, but there is little to be found in the media or discussed by our administration.20
The US is a system of many institutions including those whose sole function is to provide government oversight. When problems arise that threaten the stability of the country or the safety of the people, the US government is designed to have checks and balances that allow the people to challenge misconduct either directly or through congressional representatives. Increasingly, oversight is disintegrating. According to a 2006 report in the Boston Globe, the intelligence committee does not read most intelligence reports in their entirety.21
The media is complicit in omitting information necessary to make democratic decisions.22 A global dominance agenda includes penetration into the boardrooms of the corporate media in the US. A research team at Sonoma State University recently finished conducting a network analysis of the
18 For an analysis on the interlocking of the corporate media, think tanks and government organizations, see Peter Phillips, Bridget Thornton and Lew Brown “ The Global Dominance Group and the US Corporate Media” in Censored 2007, Seven Stories Press.
19 See: Snow, Nancy, Information War American Propaganda, Free Speech, and Opinion Control Since 9/11, 2004 Seven Stories Press and Chomsky, Noam Media Control: The Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda, 2002 Seven Stories Press
20 In researching this article, there are no instances of remarks by senior White House, Pentagon, or Congressional officials that specifically address the human effects of non-lethal EMF weapons. A search in Lexis Nexis from 2001- 2006 returned no results in American mainstream media.
21 Classified Intelligence Bills Often Are Unread: Secret Process Can Discourage House Debate, Susan Milligan, Boston Globe August 6, 2006.
22 The Global Dominance Group and the US Corporate media, by Peter Phillips, Bridget Thornton and Lew Brown, published in Censored 2007, Seven Stories Press, 2006, Chapter 10,
9

boards of directors of the ten big media organizations in the US. The team determined that only 118 people comprise the membership on the boards of director of the ten big media giants. These 118 individuals in turn sit on the corporate boards of 288 national and international corporations. Four of the top 10 media corporations in the US have DOD contractors on their boards of directors including:
William Kennard: New York Times, Carlyle Group Douglas Warner III, GE (NBC), Bechtel
John Bryson: Disney (ABC), Boeing
Alwyn Lewis: Disney (ABC), Halliburton
Douglas McCorkindale: Gannett, Lockheed-Martin
Given an interlocked media network, big media in the US effectively represent corporate America’s interests. The media elite, a key component of policy elites in the US, are the watchdogs of acceptable ideological messages, the controllers of news and information content, and the decision makers regarding media resources
It is not suggested that everyone in the government believes in global domination, nor that it is the intent of every government official to ‘cover up’ misconduct.23 Scientists involved in potentially harmful technology are not ‘mad scientists.’ In fact, there are many reports in the public sphere addressing government and military misconduct that are put forth by people within these very institutions. The problem is when the government threatens whistleblowers, intimidates officials with job loss, infiltrates activist organizations, and increases surveillance24.
PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR
Modern Psychological Operations (Psy-Ops) were significantly advanced in the Second World War 25and were brought to bear on the American public during the 1950s with the formation of a widespread network of social scientists, journalists, politicians, military specialists and intelligence operatives. Psy-Ops were used to promote a variety of programs in cooperation with the Industrial Military Complex. Their key piece of information warfare was the Communist Red Menace.26
23 Remarks on Classification, The Hon. Lee Hamilton, Information Security Oversight Office, October 18, 2005. “At a time when the US intelligence community is under intense scrutiny in the aftermath of 9/11 and the failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, we only increase public skepticism about our government by denying the public information.”
24 See: Valerie Plame, the Richard Leiby, Spy Who Got Shoved Out Into the Cold, Washington Post, October 29, 2005; Page C01; Amended 2006 surveillance bill by Bush; The FBI and the Engineering of Consent, Noam Chomsky, From Public Eye Magazine, Volume One, Number Two; and Demian Bulwa, Oakland: Police spies chosen to lead war protest, San Francisco Chronicle, Friday, July 28, 2006.
25 See William E. Daugherty and Morris Janowitz, A Psychological Warfare Casebook, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1958. In particular, see Daugherty’s article on “US Psychological Warfare Organizations in World War II,” pp. 126-136.
26 For a current view of these kinds of operations and how they are outsourced see James Bamford’s article in the Rolling Stone, The Man Who Sold the War Meet John Rendon, Bush’s General In The Propaganda War, November 17, 2005. For more information on CIA control of the media refer to Carl Bernstein, “The CIA and the Media — How America’s
10

One of the opening salvos in this war of deception was fired by George Kennan, the American ambassador to Moscow, describing the Soviet threat in a “long cable” sent to Washington in 1946. Kennan spent decades studying the Russian political scene. He became convinced that there would be little chance of cooperation with the Soviets and recommended a number of actions, most notably the institution of “political war” through the newly formed CIA – a decision he later regretted, even arguing for the elimination of the CIA in 1997.27
In the late 1950s, a right-wing cadre of men within the new CIA was busy building secret armies, planning assassinations, and generally devising plans for world domination that still play out today. Operation Gladio was one example, well documented and international in scope, in which right-wing members of the US intelligence community created “stay-behind” armies in many of the nations of Europe. Those armies managed to infiltrate the highest levels of politics (most notably in Italy where the term “Gladio” refers to a double edged sword) and have been held responsible for numerous false-flag terrorist acts through the 1980s and 1990s. Terror and propaganda often go hand-in-hand in the extremist elements within our military and intelligence communities.28
To counter the divisions within the intelligence community, a greater voice was given to organizations formal and informal. In the 1950s, one such group, the first Committee on the Present Danger (CPD), promulgated a series of “gap crises.” The Bomber Gap, the Missile Gap, the Space Gap, and the Brainwashing and Psychotronic Gap were used to justify increased military technology spending. Congress was led to believe that the Soviets were a much greater threat than they actually were, and that a terrifying new weapon was being developed that threatened America. They were thus convinced to vote for virtually any black budget proposal that came their way. The CPD ran a series of broadcasts to the public through the Mutual Broadcasting Network that spread fear in the minds of the public.
Under the first civilian CIA Director, Allen Welsh Dulles, the Company began to push forward with its agenda of manufacturing consent from the American people for a new state of perpetual war industrialization. Dulles was a well-connected individual, a successful spy for the OSS in Switzerland during the war, related to three secretaries of state, and the chief advisor to Dewey when he ran for President in 1948. Dulles had access to the highest echelons of policy making and his
Most Powerful News Media Worked Hand in Glove with the Central IntelligenceAgency and Why the Church Committee Covered It Up”, Rolling Stone, October 20, 1977, p.63.-the title of the original operation was “Mockingbird” 27 George F. Kennan. “Spy and Counterspy.” The New York Times, May 18, 1997. For a sympathetic biography see George F. Kennan and The Making of American Foreign Policy, 1947-1950, Wilson D. Miscamble, C.S.C, 1993 Princeton University Press. George F. Kennan. “Policy Planning Staff memorandum on the inauguration of organized political warfare“, May 4, 1948. Published in Foreign Relations of the United States, 1945-1950: Emergence of the Intelligence Establishment. Discusses the need for political warfare: that is, measures short of war, such as propaganda and covert operations.
28 History News Network, USA 13 June 2005, Terrorism in Western Europe: An Approach to NATO’s Secret Stay- Behind Armies, by Daniele Ganser, The Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations 1 June 2005, Kennan published his analysis anonymously in Foreign Affairs, the official magazine of the Council for Foreign Relations (CFR). [Mr. X (Alias ‘George C. Kennan): “The Sources of Soviet Conduct”, in Foreign Affairs, July 1947.] (http://www.isn.ethz.ch/php/documents/collection_gladio/Terrorism_Western_Europe.pdf.)
11

influence was global in scope, counting among his close friends Henry Luce, publisher of Newsweek. Relying heavily upon established circles of contacts within the nation’s media elites, Dulles recruited key members of the media to work directly for the CIA under Operation Mockingbird. Mockingbird was a psychological information campaign against the American people. In a campaign that would lead to acceptance of blanket secrecy for “national security”, “the Red Scare” became the excuse for spending vast sums of money on weapon systems and an increase in covert operations both in foreign countries and within the United States. In the 1950s and 1960s, movies, news articles, books, radio and television programs were carefully laced with anti- communist messages and images designed to produce an acceptance of the policies being promoted by the defense elite’s propaganda machine.29
“Among the executives who lent their cooperation to the Agency were William Paley of the Columbia Broadcasting System, Henry Luce of Time Inc., Arthur Hays Sulzberger of the New York Times, Barry Bingham Sr. of the Louisville Courier-Journal and James Copley of the Copley News Service. Other organizations which cooperated with the CIA include the American Broadcasting Company, the National Broadcasting Company, the Associated Press, United Press International, Reuters, Hearst Newspapers, Scripps-Howard, Newsweek magazine, the Mutual Broadcasting System, The Miami Herald, and the old Saturday Evening Post and New York Herald-Tribune. By far the most valuable of these associations, according to CIA officials, have been with The New York Times, CBS, and Time Inc.”30
One of the engineers of this deception was a former head of the stay-behind network, Edward W. Barrett, director of the Interdepartmental Psychological Strategy Board (IPSB) and, not coincidentally an editor at Newsweek. Barrett was seen as being very effective in his efforts to manipulate public opinion. At the same time, CPD was a “non-political group of citizens of the western coast” and launched a media campaign in favor of the urgent reinforcement of the national defense. Among the organizers of the Committee were Frank Altschul (Director of the Council for Foreign Relations), William Donovan (former head of the OSS during WWII) and General Dwight D. Eisenhower.31
All of this activity was more than enough to stoke the fears of the public and encourage policy makers to accept the Cold War view of the world. This allowed Truman to convince Congress to approve a tripled military budget that provided funding for secret research and development and turn a blind eye (in the name of National Security) to “black operations” programs authorized under the new Cold War rubric of “containment” and aimed at undermining otherwise peaceful nations and
29 Victor Marchetti and John D. Marks, The CIA and The Cult of Intelligence, Dell Books,1975 (as a matter of general interest this is reportedly the first book the Government went to court to have censored. There are 168 missing pages as a result of the courts ruling but the spaces were retained in the first edition.)
30 “The CIA and the Media”, Carl Bernstein Rolling Stone, Oct. 20, 1977
31 David F. Krugler, Will It Play in Peoria? The 1950 Campaign of Truth and the Reconstruction of Cold War Propaganda, British Association of American Studies Annual Conference April 1997 University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England
12

fomenting war, torture and assassination in countries as diverse as Iran, Guatemala and Indochina.32
Post-war developments in Europe, especially the British withdrawal from Greece, led Truman to decide it was necessary to have a permanent American presence in the old continent to counteract the Communist influence.33 General George C. Marshall, Secretary of State, designed a vast plan that mixed economic assistance and secret actions aimed at establishing democracies and making sure that voters in foreign countries made “the right choice.” National Security Council directive NSC 10/2, essentially written by Kennan, made official the creation of an anti-Communist interference network.34
The US intelligence community had an ace in the hole, Reinhardt Gehlen, a Nazi spymaster with an existing network of agents became the front man in Eastern Europe for American intelligence. General Reinhardt Gehlen proved to be troublesome for the CIA over the years. Communist counter- spies infiltrated his network, his information was often incorrect, and he had downplayed his eagerness to serve the Reich. But Gehlen was only one of thousands of Nazis recruited to assist in the new “Cold War” through Operation Paperclip.35 In fact, the intelligence assets acquired by bringing the Gestapo onto the US public payroll was overshadowed by the acquisition of dozens of brilliant Nazi scientists and researchers.
At this juncture, Truman, through the application of the 1947 National Security Act and the newly formed National Security Council36, authorized a vast number of secret projects involving chemical, biological, nuclear and electromagnetic experiments. Former Nazis were put in charge of many of the most sensitive programs and facilities. The Army Ballistic Missile Agency (ABMA) was entrusted to the former SS officer Wernher von Braun. 37 Kurt Debus, another ex-SS officer, directed Cape Canaveral. At this time scientists began working on “black” projects in earnest, including attempts at finally developing the “lost” theories of Nicola Tesla, the Serbian-born American physicist, into military and intelligence applications.38
TESLA AND EMF
32 William Blum, Killing Hope: US Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II, Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1995; Ralph McGehee, Deadly Deceits: My 25 years in the CIA, New York: Sheridan Square Publications, 1983. http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=CIA Footnote on Ops)
33 Daniele Ganser, NATO’s Secret Armies. Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe, Frank Cass Publishers, 2004.
34 See the Federation of American Scientists Intelligence resource program, National Security Council [NSC] Truman Administration [1947-1953] at http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/nsc-hst/index.html.
35 Linda Hunt, Secret Agenda: The United States Government, Nazi Scientists and Project Paperclip, 1945-1990, St. Martin’s Press, 1991.
36 The National Security Act of 1947 can be accessed at http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ho/time/cwr/17603.htm
37 Biography of Werner VonBraun produced by NASA: ww.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/sputnik/braun.html and at the Marshall Space Flight Center located at http://history.msfc.nasa.gov/vonbraun/index.html
38 Hunt, L. Secret Agenda. The United States Government, Nazi Scientists, and Project Paperclip, 1945 to 1990. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1991. Simpson, C. “Blowback. The First Full Account of America’s Recruitment of Nazis, and the Disastrous Effect on Our Domestic and Foreign Policy”. New York: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1988
13

Military interest into the weaponization of the electromagnetic spectrum has a long history, based on the theoretical work of Nikola Tesla. Radar, in its early inception, was seen not only as a means of tracking the position and speed of enemy targets, but as a potential weapon in its own right. There are very real problems however with overcoming the normal decrease in effect of an electromagnetic field over distance. This effect is a natural function of the laws of physics and applies to both electrical and magnetic fields39. In short, the strength of a field drops off in inverse proportion to the distance of the target from the source. Without a means of concentrating and directing a beam of energy across long distances, any effect that an EMF weapon may have would be limited to its immediate vicinity. From 1900 until his death in 1943, Nikola Tesla worked to develop just such a weapon.
In a letter to the New York Times editor in 1908 Telsa wrote,
“When I spoke of future warfare I meant that it should be conducted by direct application of electrical waves without the use of aerial engines or other implements of destruction…What I said in regard to the greatest achievement of the man of science whose mind is bent upon the mastery of the physical universe, was nothing more than what I stated in one of my unpublished addresses, from which I quote: “According to an adopted theory, every ponderable atom is differentiated from a tenuous fluid, filling all space merely by spinning motion, as a whirl of water in a calm lake. By being set in movement this fluid, the ether, becomes gross matter. Its movement arrested, the primary substance reverts to its normal state. It appears, then, possible for man through harnessed energy of the medium and suitable agencies for starting and stopping ether whirls to cause matter to form and disappear. At his command, almost without effort on his part, old worlds would vanish and new ones would spring into being. He could alter the size of this planet, control its seasons, adjust its distance from the sun, guide it on its eternal journey along any path he might choose, through the depths of the universe. He could make planets collide and produce his suns and stars, his heat and light; he could originate life in all its infinite forms. To cause at will the birth and death of matter would be man’s grandest deed, which would give him the mastery of physical creation, make him fulfill his ultimate destiny.”40
Tesla made several claims during the latter years of his life, published by the New York Times in what became an annual event. His theory of the hidden nature of our universe supplants those of many of his contemporaries in that he was able to infer a multidimensional model of the universe that is only now being investigated through the theoretical mathematics of our leading physicists.41
39 There are two laws of note here: the inverse square law, which relates to forces such as gravity, and the inverse cube law, which relates to electromagnetic forces. Both equations describe the relationship between the power of the force and the decrease in that forces effect over distance. In regards to magnetism we refer to the work of Maxwell. One easily accessible online source for his equations is: http://www.rialian.com/rnboyd/maxwell.htm A good place to start for understanding the man and his work is the James Clerk Maxwell Foundation at: http://www.clerkmaxwellfoundation.org/html/links.html
40 New York Times, April 21st, 1908 (p.5 column 6) Tesla Letter to the Editor :.
41 “The Cosmic Triangle: Revealing the State of the Universe,” in the May 28, 1999 issue of the journal Science
14

Tesla also developed means of remotely controlling aircraft as early as 1915, foreshadowing the Unmanned Ariel Vehicles (UAVs) of today’s battlefields. In 1934 Tesla offers to build a “Death Ray” that would make the power of an opponents air force obsolete. This was one of the earliest recorded statements regarding directed energy weapons.42 Tesla’s offer to build this device for the US government for a bargain price, but with many caveats, was refused by officials who, preferred instead to pump money into the new Army Air Corp, which in turn gave rise to the military aviation complex that we have today.43
Before the war the airline industry was not a major part of the economic life of the nation.44 With huge wartime contracts, however, corporations such as Hughes, McDonnell Douglas, Lockheed, and Northrop quickly grew in power commensurate with the financial bonanza that was unearthed in the battlefields of Europe and the Pacific.45 These companies formed the core of the “military-industrial complex.” Their investors and managers began to consolidate their clout in political circles to keep the nation on a wartime economic footing, a simple and vastly powerful weapon that would make aircraft, bombs, missiles and attendant industries irrelevant would certainly be seen as a direct threat to the growing power of military arsenal. Instead, a “black budget” program was put into motion, which exploited the work of Robert Oppenheimer, Albert Einstein and others. The Manhattan Project, developed by the DOD in 1942, generated a vastly destructive weapon that required a well- established and unbelievably expensive aerospace industry, along with unprecedented levels of secrecy and autonomy from Congress and the public.46
The US government also ignored Tesla’s offer to produce a “city killing machine,” which was composed of an electromagnetic shield and a wireless torpedo. Tesla made several proposals during the 1930s, none of which received funding. Among Tesla’s claims, published annually on his birthday in the New York Times, were methods of harnessing the power of the sun to electrify the earth and provide free electrical power to anybody, anywhere.
Tesla did, however, conceive of at least one device that became a major part of our nation’s arsenal –
discusses Dark Energy and Margaret Cheney, Tesla: A Man Out of Time, Dell Publishing, 1983.
42 Front page New York Times, July 11 1934 was entitled, “TESLA, AT 78, BARES NEW ‘DEATH BEAM'” and told of the inventor’s proposal that would “send concentrated beams of particles through the free air, of such tremendous energy that they will bring down a fleet of 10,000 enemy airplanes at a distance of 250 miles…”
43 To illustrate the control of science for corporate profit, Tesla’s practical applications all shared one thing in common, the were devoid of any profitable application. As a result, Tesla’s development of wireless electricity has never borne fruit, leaving us still in the 21st century surrounded by a landscape of transmission wires, faulty electrical grids, destructive (though profitable) electrical generation systems, wars for oil, and a suffering environment. See Marc J. Seifer, The Life and Times of Nikola Tesla, Citadel Press, 1998.
44 John B. Rae, Climb to Greatness: The American Aircraft Industry, 1920-1960, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1968. Roger E. Bilstein, The American Aerospace Industry: From Workshop to Global Enterprise, New York: Twayne Publishers, 1996. 45 Carol L. Cook, The Aerospace Industry: Its History and How it Affects the US Economy, Yale-New Haven Teachers Institute, 2005.
46 See the National Atomic Museum’s archives concerning the Manhattan Project at http://www.atomicmuseum.com/tour/manhattanproject.cfm and the Brookings Institute’s archives at http://www.brook.edu/FP/PROJECTS/NUCWCOST/MANHATTN.HTM
15

radar. As early as 1917 he published his theory and developed the first prototype in 1934. It is from the basis of this technology that future research into weaponizing the electromagnetic spectrum proceeded. At the same time Tesla was working on methods of transmitting and receiving communication signals through interplanetary space and reading the images on a sleeping person’s retina (by extension mind reading). His prediction that future wars would be fought with electromagnetic means foreshadowed the rise of electronic warfare and the non-lethal weapons technology being deployed today. 47
At first glance, it would seem probable that the military had taken over the management of Tesla’s material. In fact, a number of projects related to his life’s work were in development. For instance, the building of beam weapons at Wright Patterson Air Force Base under the code name “Project Nick”48 headed by Brigadier General L.C. Craigie. This project was however, cancelled due to an apparent lack of understanding of Tesla’s means of transmitting high-energy waves without a loss of power over great distances. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) began another project in 1958 codenamed “Seesaw” at Lawrence Livermore Labs49 aimed at combating reported Soviet advances in electromagnetic weapons and defenses, advances that many believe came about after 1952 when the bulk of Tesla’s research and personal effects were turned over to his nephew, Sava Kosanovic, who promptly whisked them away to Yugoslavia. Eight years later Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev would state that, “A new and fantastic weapon is in the hatching stage,”50 horrifying many and prompting calls for more effective means of using EMF, espionage and counter-espionage.
On February 9, 1981, the office of the Undersecretary of Defense Research and Engineering department sent a letter to the FBI that requested the papers of Tesla, stating, “We believe that certain of Tesla’s papers may contain basic principles which would be of considerable value to certain ongoing research within the DOD. It would be very helpful to have access to these papers. The letter was signed by Lt. Col. Allan J. Mclaren, an R.O.T.C. graduate from M.I.T. in 1960, who later went on to become a project director with Lockheed Martin Space Systems from which he retired in 2003.51
This section of his memo to the FBI was not declassified until 1993. In response, the FBI issued the same response as to all of the other inquiries with one exception, this time they identified who it was that examined the stored effects; it was the Office of Scientific Research and Development from
47 New York Times, 1937 “…will send concentrated beams of particles through the free air, of such tremendous energy that they will bring down a fleet of 10,000 enemy airplanes at a distance of 250 miles from the defending nation’s border and will cause armies of millions to drop dead in their tracks When put into operation, Dr. Tesla said, this latest invention of his would make war impossible. This death-beam, he asserted, would surround each country like an invisible Chinese wall, only a million times more impenetrable. It would make every nation impregnable against attack by airplanes or by large invading armies.” For an interesting article about Tesla’s “Death Ray” and the relationship to Tunguska see: http://www.viewzone.com/tesla.ray.html)
48 Tesla: Master of Lightning, archived at PBS: www.pbs.org/tesla/ll/ll_mispapers.html
49 Tesla: Life and Legacy, Missing Papers, archived at PBS: http://www.pbs.org/tesla/ll/ll_mispapers.html.
50 Max Frankel, “Khrushchev Says Soviets Will Cut Forces a Third; Sees ‘Fantastic Weapon’, New York Times, January 15,1960.
51 See Tesla’s FBI files at the FBI FOIA site located at http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/tesla.htm.
16

MIT, a breeding ground of CIA. technical types the Office of Naval Intelligence and agents from US Naval Research.52 What they may have been looking for had likely already been taken, according to a recent PBS special entitled Tesla: Life and Legacy, Tesla’s nephew reported that Tesla’s most recent journal was missing from the bulk of material stored by the OAP.53 In recent years high profile projects such as the High Altitude Auroral Project (“HAARP”), the Strategic Defense Initiative (“Star Wars”), and many of the devices promoted by proponents of “Non-Lethal Weapons” have Tesla’s intellectual fingerprints all over them.54
MK-ULTRA
In terms of mind-control and the breaking down of prisoners for military interrogations, the events at Abu-Ghraib, Guantanamo, and in the CIA network of secret prisons dotting the globe, all have their intellectual origin in the work carried out by a network of scientists under the behest of the intelligence community beginning in the World War II period. Mind-control, per se, refers to a well- funded, broad based series of programs designed to explore the furthest reaches of human cognitive ability. The Nazis, as well as the Japanese, had been experimenting on prisoners throughout the war. Recovery of the records of these experiments led the US to proceed with investigations into new means of interrogations and the building of resistance to interrogations of US personnel..55
The CIA, in association with various other agencies, undertook a long series of experiments on unsuspecting prisoners, students, military personnel and others recruited into one of the at least 162 subprojects of what became known as MKULTRA.56 Interest was certainly piqued by the case of Cardinal Mindseztny and the reports of brainwashing techniques used on American soldiers in prisoner of war camps in Korea57. But even prior to the Korean War the resiliency of the human mind was being tested by researchers on the black budget. These projects reportedly at times violated every conceivable notion of human rights and dignity.58
Frank Olson, a mid-level CIA operative, worked on the development of aerosol delivery of drugs and poisons at Ft. Detrick, Maryland. His work, which is still classified, was. funded through MKULTRA. Olson took a trip to England where MI6 and the CIA were working together on ways to
52 Tesla: Life and Legacy, Missing Papers, archived at PBS: http://www.pbs.org/tesla/ll/ll_mispapers.html.
53 Tesla: Master of Lightning PBS documentary Dec. 12th, 2000.
54 Box#8 of Declassified CIA documents pertaining to MKULTRA contains the following fragment: The Application of Tesla’s Technology in Today’s World. Obtain, online, through the National Security Archives at http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/
55 Harris, S. (1994) Factories Of Death: Japanese Biological Warfare, 1932-45, And The American Cover-Up. London: Routledge.Tanaka, Y. 1998. Hidden Horrors: Japanese War Crimes in World War II. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, Michalczyk, J. J. 1994. Medicine, ethics, and the Third Reich: Historical and Contemporary Issues (METR). Kansas City, Missouri: Sheed & Ward
56 This site provides a selection of memorandum from within the CIA, in which funding is discussed. http://cryptome.org/mkultra-0003.htm Digital MK-Ultra files can be found at: http://www.intellnet.org/mkultra/general note about MK-ULTRA funding)
57 Stephen Budiansky, Erica E. Goode and Ted Gest, “The Cold War Experiments”, U.S News and World Report January 24, 1994.
58 Patricia Greenfield, CIA’s Behavior Caper, APA Monitor, December 1977, pp. 1, 10-11
17

prevent allied spies and servicemen from yielding to interrogation. Olson also traveled to Frankfurt, where the two agencies conducted fatal experiments on prisoners of war and others considered to be “expendable.” Olson had an ethical dilemma with the research and, after voicing his concerns, returned to the United States. On November 28, 1953, Olson was in room 1018A of the Hotel Statler in New York. At 2 a.m., Olson fell from the 10th floor window of his room to his death on the sidewalk below. The headline reported his death as an accident or suicide. This report was discredited when, in 1975, another official lie was issued to ease his family’s suffering and deflect public scrutiny. This time Olson was called the victim of an LSD experiment.59 Media reports cited in the New York Times focused on the sensational aspects of LSD use and psychic warfare, but did not dwell on the more egregious violations of human rights and dignity inherent in the programs overseen by the CIA.60
The truth was not revealed until 1994 when his son finally had his body exhumed and examined. The autopsy showed that Olson’s left temple had been fractured before he fell. According to the New York Times Magazine CIA tradecraft books from 1953, that have since been released teach that “one of the surest methods of killing somebody without a trace involves impairing their reflexes with alcohol (or drugs) and then stepping up behind them and stunning them with a blow to the temple. After that you quickly grab their ankles and in a single motion flip them over a bridge, balcony or out of a window more than 70 feet off of the ground.”61 What Olson saw, and what cost him his life and his family their peace of mind for 30 years, was the beginning of a long term strategy to develop means of making individual both resistant to “brainwashing” and to control the actions of individuals.62 The cover story that was used to justify the beginning of the project was that there was a “brainwashing gap” with the Koreans.63
Experimenters used college students, servicemen, mental patients, the poor and, in several instances, children as young as four years old, in attempts to create untraceable assassins, couriers and other operatives. MKULTRA sub-projects involved the services of many notable universities and used a number of false front corporations such as the Foundation for the Study of Human Ecology and think tanks such as RAND, to shield the source of funding from those with ethical “problems.”64 We would still know nothing of these activities had it not been for the release of 16,000 pages of documents in 1977 through the FOIA request filed by the surviving family of Frank Olson. Unfortunately CIA Director Richard Helms ordered the destruction of any MKULTRA records
59 Thomas O’Toole, “CIA Infiltrated 17 Area Groups, Gave out LSD Suicide Revealed”, front-page story Washington Post, June 11, 1975.
60 Carl Bernstein, “The CIA and the Media: How Americas Most Powerful News Media Worked Hand in Glove with the Central Intelligence Agency and Why the Church Committee Covered It Up”, Rolling Stone, October 20, 1977.
61 Michael Ignatieff, “What did the C.I.A. Do to Eric Olson’s Father?” New York Times Magazine, April 1, 2001.
62 ibid. and The Frank Olson Project at http://www.frankolsonproject.org/Contents.htmlhttp://www.frankolsonproject.org/Statements/FamilyStatement2002.htm l. Dr. Eric Olson continues to do what he can to bring to light the truth of his father’s death. At the above website there are memorandum written by Dick Cheney to Donald Rumsfeld in regards to the families lawsuit during the Ford administration in 1975
63 Reported in the New York Times as “Mind Control Studies had Origin in Trial of Mindszenty”, Aug. 2, 1977, p.16.
64 See Athan G. Theoharis, “Researching the Intelligence Agencies: The Problem of Covert Activities”, The Public Historian, 1984 National Council on Public History, University of California Press.
18

shortly before the order came in to his office65, leaving an incomplete picture of a concerted effort by various agencies to create new and better means of controlling the thoughts, emotions and thus behavior, of unsuspecting individuals.
ILLEGAL EXPERIMENTATION
MKULTRA was, however, neither the first nor the last project funded by government or industry to experiment on people in the name of some greater good. A quick review of the history of secret experimentation and medical atrocities reveals a pattern of deadly behavior
The Tuskegee Experiments in 1932 cruelly condemned scores of black men to death from syphilis.66
The Pellagra Incident, in which millions died over two decades, in spite of the fact that the US Public Health Service knew at the time that these deaths were caused by little more than a niacin deficiency.67
In 1940 scientists exposed four-hundred prisoners in Chicago with malaria (a US experiment Nazis cited at the Nuremberg trials to defend their own experimentation).68
During WWII, Seventh Day Adventist conscientious objectors were enlisted into Operation Whitecoat by the US Army and the Adventist Church. They were told that they were being tested for defensive research purposes while the government was in fact testing offensive chemical and biological weapons.69
After WWII, matters became far worse for those who were caught up in the web of illegal scientific testing. In 1947 Colonel E.E. Kirkpatrick of the US Atomic Energy Commission issued a secret document stating that the agency would begin administering intravenous doses of radioactive substances to human subjects. At the same time atomic tests in which the residents of Utah and Nevada were purposely exposed to radioactive fallout. There were also a series of operations during the 1940s and 1950s in which US cities were attacked secretly by the military through the spread of biological agents in order to track their propagation through a real population.70
65 Project MKULTRA, The CIA’s Program of Research in Behavioral Modification, August 3, 1977, US Senate, Select Committee on Intelligence, and Subcommittee on Health and Scientific Research of the Committee on Human Resources.
66 Jean Heller (Associated Press), “Syphilis Victims in the US Study Went Untreated for 40 Years” New York Times, July 26, 1972: and VN Gamble, “Under the Shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and Health Care.” American Journal of Public Health 7(1997):1773-1778.
67 Jon M. Harkness, “Prisoners and Pellagra”, Public Health Reports, Sep/Oct96, Vol. 111 Issue 5, p 463.
68 “They Were Cheap and Available: Prisoners as Research Subjects in Twentieth Century America.” British Medical Journal 315:1437.
69 Krista Thompson Smith, “Adventists and Biological Warfare”, Spectrum Magazine, Vol 25, no. 3, March 1996 and David R. Franz, DVM, PhD, Cheryl D. Parrott, Ernest T. Takafuji, MD, MPH, “The US Biological Warfare and Biological Defense Programs” in Medical Aspects of Chemical and Biological Warfare, Part 1; The Textbook of Military Medicine, Office of Surgeon General, Borden Institute 1997; p. 425-436.
70 Atomic Energy Commission Secret Memo by Kirkpatrick, E. E. Col. A January 8, 1947, This was a draft memo from
19

THE SCIENTISTS Dr. Ewen Cameron71
Once the details of MKULTRA came to light, the focus in the media and in the Senate, was on the use of drugs, especially LSD. While the researchers within the project did indeed concentrate on developing a variety of hallucinogenic concoctions, they did so with an end in mind. The goal was to devise means and methods of enabling undercover operatives, soldiers, contractors or anyone who was involved in secret projects, to be able to keep those secrets if they were captured or interrogated. Hypnosis, combined with drugs, sensory deprivation and systematic abuse were seen as a means to that end. The leader in this pharmaceutical and psychological research was Dr. Ewen Cameron. Cameron was at the time, one of the most esteemed psychiatrists in the world. As president of the American Psychiatric Association, Canadian Psychiatric Association, and one of the founders of the World Psychiatric Association, Dr. Cameron began experimenting on brainwashing techniques as early as the 1930s with schizophrenic patients. At this time lobotomies were not yet in common use, though the procedure would begin to be implemented in 1936 on a wide scale. Electroshock therapy was some years from being accepted as a primary means of changing behavior.72
Cameron relied on torturous and highly stressful techniques for breaking down the personality of his patients. Schizophrenics would be stripped down naked beneath red lights for eight hours a day, sometimes for up to eight months with repeated messages inundating their senses. In other experiments Cameron would attempt to induce the delirium associated with a high fever by cooking his patients in an electric cage until their body temperature reached 102 degrees.
From January of 1957 until September of 1960 Cameron became one of the promising researchers the CIA turned to in order to develop means and methods of “brainwashing” and programming
Colonel Kirkpatrick, Acting Manager, Field Operations of AEC, to the AEC Berkeley Area Engineer, puts the AEC stamp on termination of human testing, while simultaneously revealing it was going on under the Manhattan Project-at the request of Oppenhiemer: “Until the Atomic Energy Commission is able to consider sponsoring this type of experimentation, authorization cannot be given for the use of radioactive materials in human subjects under this contract.” A more current report from the National Security Archives that clearly lays out the timeline and the assault by researchers on “subjects” can be found at http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/radiation/dir/mstreet/commeet/meet12/brief12/tab_f/br12f1d.txt—-“ Personal Statement from Elizabeth Zitrin, Attorney at Law Public Member of the Ad Hoc Committee on Radiation Experiments”. For information on biological warfare experiments a good starting place is : Biological Warfare: A Historical Perspective, by LTC George W. Christopher, USAF, MC; LTC Theodore J. Cieslak, MC, USA, MAJ Julie A. Pavlin, MC, USA, and LTC (P) Edward M. Eitzen Jr., MC, USA. — Operational Medicine Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Maryland, as posted at http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/cbw/bw.htm
71 This section about Dr. Cameron is based on Orlikow Vs. United States, CIA Settlement of Some Complaints. Ewen Cameron and the Allan Memorial Institute – Subproject 68 funded by CIA from March 18, 1957 to June 30, 1960 Without conceding liability, in 1988 the CIA agreed to pay $750,000 to settle a case brought on behalf of nine plaintiffs who were subjected to federally funded mind control experiments sponsored by the CIA and conducted by prominent psychiatrist Ewen Cameron, M.D. The experiments included heavy does of LSD, electroshock and psychic driving.
72 See “CIA Brainwashing Experiments”, MacLean’s; January 28, 1985, Vol. 98 Issue 6, p46, 1/3p and “A cold-war horror show’s last act”, US News & World Report; October 17, 88, Vol. 105 Issue 15, p13, 1/3p.
20

human beings to do the will of the agency. Cameron received $64,242.4473 from the CIA. to develop a combination of techniques that would destroy an individual’s memory of an event and enable the programmer to control their behavior through post-hypnotic commands. Cameron used a variety of drug combinations coupled with prolonged sleep deprivation, isolation, hypnosis, and electro convulsive therapy in order to “wipe” an individual’s memory. His techniques worked, to a certain extent, but ethical considerations led the CIA to cut Cameron’s funding in the US, prompting Cameron to move to Canada to continue his work with funding channeled through the Canadian Government.
He continued his work, officially, from 1961 until 1964 in Montreal where he received an additional $57,750.74 During this time Cameron combined his techniques (in a “therapy” he called de- patterning) with electroconvulsive therapy in which the voltage introduced into one subjects brain, Linda Macdonald, exceeded the APA’s guidelines by 76.5 times. He succeeded in wiping her memory and to this day, she cannot remember anything prior to 1963. In a January 17, 1984 broadcast of the Canadian Broadcasting System, a program called “The Fifth Estate” detailed the experiments of Cameron, prompting a burst of investigative journalism culminating in a class-action suit brought against the CIA by former subjects. In 1988, the case was settled out of court for $750,000, divided between 8 plaintiffs. Linda Macdonald received $100,000 and legal fees from the Canadian government, but Cameron himself, faced no punishment.75
Dr. Jose Delgado
Whereas Cameron focused on creating traumatized individuals through intense psychological pressure, Dr. Jose Delgado was investigating the direct route to control of “human subjects.” Delgado physically invaded the brains of subjects with electrodes in order to create emotions and control actions with the push of a button. As he stated himself,
“We need a program of psychosurgery for political control of our society. The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from the given norm can be surgically mutilated. The individual may think that the most important reality is his own existence, but this is only his personal point of view. This lacks historical perspective. Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation has great appeal. We must electrically control the brain. Some day armies and generals will be controlled by electric stimulation of the brain.” 76
In his paper “Intracerebral Radio Stimulation and Recording in Completely Free Patients,” Delgado observed that:
“Radio Stimulation on different points in the amygdala and hippocampus in the four
73 CIA MORI ID 17468: www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrol
74 Collins, Anne. In the Sleep Room. The Story of CIA Brainwashing in Canada. Ken Porter Books, 1988
75 Tyner, Arlene. Mind-Control Part 1: Canadian and US Survivors Seek Justice, PROBE Magazine, March-April, 2000 76 Dr. Jose M.R. Delgado Director of Neuropsychiatry, Yale University Medical School. Congressional Record,
No. 26, Vol. 118 February 24, 1974.
21

patients produced a variety of effect, including pleasant sensations, elation, deep thoughtful concentration, odd feelings, super relaxation (an essential precursor for deep hypnosis) colored visions, and other responses.”77
Delgado, to his credit, did make great strides toward a better understanding the physiology of brain structures and their attendant behavioral and emotional correlates, strides that did not go unnoticed by the intelligence community and the military.
While Delgado worked in an area of specific interest, the direct stimulation of brain structures through implanted electronics, other researchers explored means of creating multiple personalities and programming the alternate personalities that emerged to do a variety of intelligence related work as operatives, still others explored the effects of various drug combinations and other “programming” and interrogation techniques aimed at creating super spies and breaking down enemy agents.
THE EXPOSURE OF WATERGATE/MKULTRA/COINTELPRO
According to testimony by Senator Edward Kennedy in 1977,
“Some 2 years ago, the Senate Health Subcommittee heard chilling testimony about the human experimentation activities of the Central Intelligence Agency. The Deputy Director of the CIA revealed that over 30 universities and institutions were involved in an ‘extensive testing and experimentation’ program which included covert drug tests on unwitting citizens ‘at all social levels, [high and low], native Americans and foreign.’ Several of these [tests involved] the administration of LSD to ‘unwitting subjects in [social] situations.’ … The Central Intelligence Agency drugged American citizens without their knowledge or consent. It used university facilities and personnel without their knowledge.” 78
As an example of the hubris wrought by institutions veiled in secrecy, given unlimited funds and staffed with amoral people we can only refer to the statement made by George White in a letter to MKUltra director Sidney Gottleib: “I toiled wholeheartedly in the vineyards because it was fun, fun, fun! Where else could an American boy lie, cheat, rape and pillage with the sanction and blessing of the All Highest?” 79
After Watergate, more information hit the papers, COINTELPRO was uncovered by a group of people who have never been apprehended, in spite of a six-year FBI investigation. The COINTELPRO program was secret until 1971, when an FBI field office was burglarized by a group
77 “Intracerebral Radio Stimulation and Recording in Completely Free Patients,”, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, October, 1968.
78 Testimony of US Senator Edward Kennedy, Joint Hearing before the Select Committee on Intelligence, US Senate, 95th Congress, 1977.
79 (letter to Sidney Gottleib) See also Sex, drugs and the CIA, by Douglas Valentine posted at http://www.counterpunch.org/valentine0621.html
22

calling themselves the Citizens’ Commission to Investigate the FBI. These people broke into an FBI office in Pennsylvania, rifled through the filing cabinets and leaked to the press documents detailing the abuses suffered by a wide variety of activists, including a long-term plan to destroy Martin Luther King Jr.:
“Agents tapped his phone, bugged his rooms, trumpeted his supposed commie connections, and his sexual proclivities, and sicced the Internal Revenue Service on him. When it was announced in 1964 that King would receive a Nobel Peace Prize, the FBI grew desperate. Hoping to prevent King from accepting the award, the Bureau mailed him a package containing a tape of phone calls documenting King’s extramarital affairs and an anonymous, threatening letter (shown here in censored form). In barely concealed language, King was told to commit suicide before the award ceremony or risk seeing his “filthy, abnormal fraudulent self” exposed to the nation. Fortunately, King ignored the FBI’s advice. He accepted the award and lived four more years until his assassination.” 80
Some of the largest COINTELPRO campaigns targeted the Socialist Worker’s Party, the Ku Klux Klan, the “New Left” (including several anti-war groups such as the Students for a Democratic Society and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee), Black Liberation groups (such as the Black Panthers and the Republic of New Africa), Puerto Rican independence groups, the American Indian Movement, and the Weather Underground. Later, Director Hoover declared that the centralized COINTELPRO was over, and that all future counterintelligence operations would be handled on a case-by-case basis.81
In addition, the MKULTRA documents hit the press and a number of books were written about the subject, most notable were’ “The Search for the Manchurian Candidate” by John Marks, “Bluebird” by Colin A. Ross MD, and “A Nation Betrayed” by Carol Rutz. At this point victims began to come forward with claims of being horribly abused in these programs, one of the most famous is a woman named Candy Jones who described in stunning detail a tale of corruption and abuse.82
When Jimmy Carter became President in 1976 he promptly moved to introduce a modicum of control, he instituted the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act establishing an 11 member secret court to oversee the surveillance activities of our covert agencies. As an example of the limited reporting requirements for the court we have the first report issued to Vice President
80 Martin Luther King, Jr., “Statement on Joseph Alsop and J. Edgar Hoover’s charge of alleged Communist infiltration of the Civil Rights Movement,” 23 April 1964 and Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, United States Senate, Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans, Book III, Final Report. 14 April 1976
81 “Me and My Shadow”: A History of the FBI’s Covert Operations and COINTELPRO – Part 1. Produced by Adi Gevins, Pacifica Radio. 1976. Rebroadcast by Democracy Now! Wednesday, June 5, 2002. See also Paul Wolf’s website for a detailed archive of official COINTELPRO documents and transcripts of the Church Committee hearings:http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/cointel.htm
82 Donald Bain, . The Control of Candy Jones. Chicago, Playboy Press, 1976. (Reissued in 2002 by Barricade books as The CIA’s Control of Candy Jones with a new introduction by Bain)
23

Mondale from Attorney General Benjamin R. Civiletti in 1979:
This report is submitted pursuant to Section 107 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, Title 50, United States Code Section 1807.
During calendar year 1979, 199 applications were made for orders and extensions of orders approving electronic surveillance under the Act. The United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court issued 207 orders granting authority for the requested electronic surveillances. No orders were entered which modified or denied the requested authority.83
Pointedly Carter’s reform measure did not do anything to insure that the American public would be protected in the future from abuse and testing at the hands of the intelligence arm of the military- industrial complex. Carter’s move to reform the CIA was to appoint an outsider as head of the agency, Admiral Stansfield Turner. After Turner took over as Director of the CIA 800 “rogue” agents were let go, though most all of them found work in various false front companies that had been set up in the previous years. 84
Both the Rockefeller Commission and the Church Committee revealed a long standing pattern of both developing new psychological, pharmaceutical and radiological technologies, to influence individuals and groups and long standing pattern of behavior whereby politically disruptive citizens were systematically targeted, harassed and destroyed. Yet there have, to date, been no provisions instituted which would stop this behavior, nor is there any guarantee that these kinds of covert programs ever actually ceased. The only practical change engendered by the disclosures of the 1970s was to drive these kinds of operations further into the shadows. That such research and experimentation may still be occurring is evidenced by a DOD directive, issued by the Secretary of the Navy on November 6, 2006 that specifically requires prior approval of the Under Secretary of the Navy before conducting “severe or unusual intrusions, either physical or psychological, on human subjects (such as consciousness altering drugs, or mind-control techniques).”85
Non-Lethal Weapons Research Today
There is a long history that illustrates US Intelligence operations had tragic results for many involved. There was, however, no public debate surrounding these black operations because they were classified under the guise of national security. MKULTRA, Project PANDORA, plutonium testing, and many more projects conducted by the DOD and the CIA were exposed by committees
83 1979 FISA report can be obtained at the Federation of American Scientists website: http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/doj/fisa/1979rept.html.
84 William Blum, The CIA: A Forgotten History, Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey, Zed Books Ltd. 1986; Alan Moore Bill Sienkewitz, Shadowplay-The Secret Team, Forestville CA, Eclipse Books, 1987 and Leslie Cockburn, Out of Control, New York, Atlantic Monthly Press 1987.
85 SECNAV Instruction 3900.39D, Subj: “Human Research Protection Program”, November 6, 2006. www.fas.org/irp/DODdir/navy/secnavinst/3900_39d.pdf
24

led by Senators Rockefeller and Church in the 1970s.86 However, tighter restrictions on human experiment including accountability and transparency did not occur until 1997, when President Clinton instituted revised protocols on human experiments.87
Official reports insist that the research involving experiments during the 1950s through the 1970s was destroyed. Yet, the scientists involved went without punishment, free to continue their careers.88 Given the levels of ongoing EMF technology research today, and the recent retroactive approval of torture approved by the Military Commissions Act, it may be that human testing is occurring under post-9/11 national security protocols. Can we accept that all the psychological research conducted with government funding up to the 1970s was simply destroyed? At this time, the American public has no way to answer this question. The current administration classifies more information than any previous US administration.89 Unclassified documents have even been recalled and re-classified.90
In the 1980s nuclear radiation experiments on humans became public knowledge and Russian tests making use of the electromagnetic spectrum were exposed.91 Countries around the world passed laws and signed treaties in response to the danger of weapons that could adversely effect human behavior or manipulate human cognition. The Russians banned all EMF weapons in 2001.
These treaties have roots in the human radiation experiments of the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s. In effect, these treaties declared a basic tenant of human rights and cognitive liberties.92
In the quest for global military superiority, the US stepped up funding for the concept of the “Future Warrior” beginning in the late 1990s with the use of advanced nano-technology.93 The idea was to streamline the military, improve soldier performance, control the fighting in real-time and avoid soldier mortality. Toward this end, the concept was to enhance the ability of soldiers in the field to interface with computer systems by using their own brain waves.94 The US began to fund research
86 The Church and Rockefeller Committee reports can be accessed through the Assassination Archives and Research Center: http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/church/contents.htm
87 Memorandum of March 27, 1997–Strengthened Protections for Human Subjects of Classified Research. [Federal Register: May 13, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 92)] [Page 26367-26372].
88Scientific American talks about the work of Jose Delgado and states that Dr. Delgado stopped doing research as late as the 1990’s, see: John Horgan, “The Forgotten Era of the Brain”, Scientific American, September 26, 2005.
89 Declassification in Reverse: The US Intelligence Community’s Secret Historical Document Reclassification Program, Matthew M. Aid. Located at the George Washington University National Security Archive, http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB179/#report.
90 Executive Order 12958, originally signed by Clinton after Wen Ho Lee, a Los Alamos scientist was accused of giving the Chinese information, was amended by George W. Bush pm March 25, 2003. The amendment can be accessed at the White House website, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030325-11.html.
91 The United Nations and Disarmament: 1945-1985 by the UN Department for Disarmament Affairs. (1985) New York, UN Publication Sales
92 For a comprehensive listing of treaties and international conferences surrounding these concerns, see the Sunshine Project at http://www.sunshine-project.org/, See Also: Human Rights: Beyond the Liberal Vision, Judith Blau and Alberto Moncada, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 2005
93 Amy Kruse, Program Manager at Defense Sciences Office, DARPA “Defense and Biology: Fundamentals for the Future”. MIT also has The Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies established in 2002 with a five-year, $50 million contract from the US Army, http://web.mit.edu/isn/index.html.
94 See DARPA, “Neurotechnology for Intelligence Analysts”, http://www.darpa.mil/dso/thrust/biosci/nia.htm. 25

into decoding the brain as well as other neurological research. President George H.W. Bush declared the 1990s “The Decade of the Brain”.95 At the same time, funding for computer to human interface poured into universities and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) stepped up their research and development. In the universities, the field became “cognitive science” and within DARPA, the term “augmented cognition” was born.96 While developments in brain research are touted for their amazing therapeutic advances in the medical field, they primarily serve the purposes of the US military.97
Americans have little idea about the research concerning the capabilities of electromagnetism, directed acoustics, or computer-human interfacing. The majority of Americans do not know that we are currently using these new-concept weapons in Iraq and Afghanistan. Indiana University law professor David Fidler stated to the Economist, “because these weapons are most likely to be used on civilians, it is not clear that using them is legal under the international rules governing armed conflict…if they are used in conjunction with conventional weapons, they could end up making war more deadly, rather than less.”98
A peek into the US arsenal of weapons is like a look into a science fiction film. DARPA and various military research labs provide a view of the current technology available to enhance US soldiers in the field and manipulate the emotions and behaviors of the perceived enemy. As American sentiment toward the Iraq war spirals downward, along with the approval ratings of the US president, domestic civil disobedience is likely to rise, as it has in many countries in response to US foreign policy.
Are new electromagnetic weapons in the possession of the government be used on American citizens? The issue at hand is whether the research and technology currently being developed will benefit or harm us and how much liberty we are willing to sacrifice for a possibly skewed sense of national security and protection.
In September 2006, Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne announced that crowd control weapons should be tested on Americans first. “If we’re not willing to use it here against our fellow citizens, then we should not be willing to use it in a wartime situation,” said Wynne. “(Because) if I hit somebody with a non-lethal weapon and they claim that it injured them in a way that was not intended, I think that I would be vilified in the world press.”99
95 The proclamation declaring the 1990’s the “Decade of the Brain” was signed by President George H.W. Bush on July 17, 1990, which can be accessed at the Library of Congress, http://www.loc.gov/loc/brain/proclaim.html.
96 See the Augmented Cognition International Society, http://www.augmentedcognition.org/history.htm.
97 Fronteirs in Neuroscience- Artificial Intelligence in the Pentagon and Beyond. http://www.neuropsychiatryreviews.com/mar06/android.html
98 “Electromagnetic weapons: Come fry with me”, The Economist, January 30, 2003.
99 Lolita C. Baldor, Associated Press, 9/12/2006. In addition to this comment, the Air Force released a declassified document located at the website of the Federation of American Scientists, ( http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/hamilton.pdf directing the acquisitions team from the media. The author is the USAF principal deputy assistant secretary for acquisition, management and logistics, Darlene Druyun:“Effective immediately, I do not want anyone within the Air Force acquisition community discussing any of our programs with the media (on or off the record). This includes presenting program briefings in any forums at which the media may be present.”
26

Non-lethal weapons sound harmless in relation to guns and bombs. However, non-lethal weapons are not just tazers and annoying sounds. Nor are they harmless. In fact, NLWs are such a concern that many countries have treaties demanding transparency. Beginning in the 1990s, groups have formed to provide oversight of NLW research, including international committees, concerned scientists, and citizens’ groups including the Federation of American Scientists and the Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics.100 The proliferation of NLWs have raised concern within the EU, Russia, and other countries, as records of Cold War abuses come to light and people come forward with complaints of illegal testing.101
The concern is more than a political issue and stretches beyond civil liberties into human rights as they relate to a person’s cognitive liberties. The following section highlights technologies with the capability to control and manipulate individuals or large groups of people.
Crowd Control using the Electromagnetic Spectrum
The electromagnetic spectrum has provided the military with an expanse of weapons, which are operational and in military and private use today in the form of millimeter waves,102 pulsed energy projectiles, and high power magnetic weapons.
Project Sheriff
The US has deployed the Project Sheriff active denial weapon in Iraq. Raytheon outfitted Humvees with their Silent Guardian Protection System, a device capable of heating the skin to 1/64 of an inch, causing instant pain similar to intense sunburn, 103 with the goal to facilitate dispersing a crowd. According to a report released by the Air Force on the human effects of this weapon, people with contact lenses and those wearing metal suffered greater effects. An imprint of a coin was discovered on the skin of a test subject and death or severe heart problems may occur.104
Pulsed Energy Projectiles
100 For a list of these groups see, Non Lethal Weapons, July 2005, compiled by Terry Kiss, Bibliographer, Air University Library, Maxwell AFB, AL accessed at the Maxwell Internet site, http://www.au.af.mil/au/aul/bibs/soft/nonlethal.htm and Appendix A of this paper.
101 For further reading on these treaties, see The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists , September/October 1994 pp. 40-45 (vol. 50, no. 05), “The Soft Kill Fallacy” by Steven Aftergood and Barbara Hatch Rosenberg’s in the same issue, “Sidebar: A non-lethal laundry list”. Rosenberg cites the Conference on Disarmament, Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Chemical Weapons to the Conference on Disarmament, Aug. 26, 1992, Nos. 22, 25, 34 (CD/1170) as well as the treaty, “Convention on Prohibition or Restriction of the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects.”
102 A detailed study conducted by Andrei G. Pakhomov, Yahya Akyel, Olga N. Pakhomova, Bruce E. Stuck, and Michael R. Murphy with the Brooks Air Force Base, Human Effectiveness Directorate, offers a scientific analysis of the effects of millimeter waves, “Current State and Implications of Research on Biological Effects of Millimeter Waves: A Literature Review”, McKesson BioServices (A.G.P., Y.A., O.N.P.), U. S. Army Medical Research Detachment of the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (B.E.S.), and Directed Energy Bioeffects Division, Human Effectiveness Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory (M.R.M.), Brooks Air Force Base, San Antonio, TX.
103 US Non Lethal Weapons for Iraq http://www.oft.osd.mil/library/library_files/article_461_Boston%20Globe.doc
104 “Rumsfeld’s Ray Gun,” By Kelly Hearn, AlterNet. Posted August 19, 2005, http://www.alternet.org/story/24044/
27

Pulsed Energy Projectiles (PEPs) are another form of weaponry that is used to paralyze a victim with pain. According to New Scientist magazine, the expanding plasma effects nerve cells, but the long- term effects remain a public mystery.105 The Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Program reports that, PEPs create a flash bang effect that startles and distracts.106 However, the effects are much greater than just startling an individual. A 2001 Time magazine article states that the PEP “superheats the surface moisture around a target so rapidly that it literally explodes, producing a bright flash of light and a loud bang. The effect is like a stun grenade, but unlike a grenade the pep travels at nearly the speed of light and can take out a target with pinpoint accuracy…as far away as 2 km.”107
While the effects of these weapons appear to be short-term and topical in nature, there is evidence that electromagnetic weapons have effects on the brain, including sleep disruption and behavior changes.108 They can produce anxiety and fear or compliance in humans. It is possible to use these weapons as a means of torture, yet without knowing exactly when, where, and how the weapons are used, we are left to speculate.109 An article by David Hambling in New Scientist magazine, March 2005, was titled, “Maximum pain is aim of new US weapons.” In 2006, Dr. Brian Martin, associate professor in Science, Technology and Society, University of Wollongong, Australia, co-authored a paper entitled “Looming struggles over technology for border control,” which describes the potential catastrophes that would lead to an extreme border protection plan. In the event of a natural disaster, or the rapid reduction of resources, or a major climactic change such as drought, rich countries will have a need to reinforce their borders against a massive influx of refugees. This scenario is often described in the nation-state context but it is possible to imagine such a perceived need in the event of internal civil unrest.
Directed Acoustics
In Maoist China, cities were equipped with megaphones, bombarding the people with on-going propaganda. The megaphones were in full vision of the people, yet there was no way to escape the sound. Today technology exists that fills a similar purpose. Voice to Skull directed acoustic devices are neuro-electromagnetic non-lethal weapons that can produce sounds within the skull of a human.110
A similar technology, known as Hypersonic Sound, is used in a similar fashion. According to its inventor, Elwood Norris of American Technology Corporation (ATC), the handheld speaker can
105 See government contract M67854-04-C-5074, University of Florida, Division of Sponsored Research, July 1, 2004. Also located at http://www.defensetech.org/peoplezapping.pdf
106 According to a 2002 Joint Non Lethal Weapons Program document: www.dtic.mil/ndia/2002infantry/swenson.pdf 107 Lev Grossman, “Beyond the Rubber Bullet”, Time Magazine, July 21, 2002.
108 David S. Walonick, “Effects of 6-10 Hz ELF on Brain Waves, www.borderlands.com/archives/arch/elf.htm
109 David Hambling, Maximum Pain is Aim Of New US Weapons, New Scientist, March 2005.
110 Definition from the Center for Army Lessons Learned, Fort Leavenworth, KS: “Nonlethal weapon which includes (1) a neuro-electromagnetic device which uses microwave transmission of sound into the skull of persons or animals by way of pulse-modulated microwave radiation; and (2) a silent sound device which can transmit sound into the skull of person or animals. NOTE: The sound modulation may be voice or audio subliminal messages. One application of V2K is use as an electronic scarecrow to frighten birds in the vicinity of airports.”http://call.army.mil/products/thesaur/00016275.htm
28

focus sound waves directly at a person without anyone else hearing the sound. The technology is being tested by corporations such as McDonald’s and Wal Mart to direct advertisements into a consumer’s head.
The Long Rage Acoustical Device (LRAD),111 is used by the military in situations such as crowd control, mass notification, and perimeter enforcement. For instance, an unruly mob may not hear a warning to disperse with traditional acoustic technology, or border enforcement agents may need to warn an approaching intruder to turn away or face bodily harm. The technology has advantages over lethal force, yet it also has the potential to inflict physical harm, emotional manipulation, and death. According to Defense Update, the LRAD can produce a 150-decibel acoustic beam from 300 meters away. The human threshold for pain is between 120 to 140 decibels.112 In a 2003 New York Times article Mr. Norris demonstrates his technology to the reporter. At 1% of capacity, the reporter’s eyes hurt, and hours later still experienced a headache.113
This technology can inflict permanent damage and death despite its classification as a non-lethal weapon. While the LRAD may be seen as a way to save lives in times of disaster or to avoid civilian casualties, the LRAD and similar directed acoustics may be cause for concern to those who exercise their right to assemble and conduct peaceful demonstrations and protests. The New York City police used the LRAD at the Republican National Convention and it was also used in Miami at a WTO Free Trade protests.114 Covering one’s ears will not protect a person and given, the long-range capabilities, fleeing from the beam may not help either (as evidenced in the use of directed acoustics against Jewish settlers in Gaza). The Associated Press (AP) reported that a device called “the scream” was used in a 2005 protest against Palestinians who “covered their ears and grabbed their heads, overcome by dizziness and nausea, after the vehicle-mounted device began sending out bursts of audible, but not loud, sound at intervals of about 10 seconds. An AP photographer at the scene said that even after he covered his ears, he continued to hear the sound ringing in his head.”115
Neurological Technology
Neurobiology has many facets including therapeutic applications with Alzheimer’s, epilepsy, depression, and stroke victims using Trancranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS). Bush’s Decade of the Brain produced outstanding advances for those with spinal cord injuries as well, which allows a paralyzed person to control a computer screen or a limb with a brain implant. There is also a new field in neurological research, Augmented Cognition. From universities to private business to the military, advances in neuro-technology can be used for amazing good. However, as we learned from the history of the Cold War, technology that has the capacity to heal also has the capacity to harm. Of great concern is the research being conducted at DARPA, which is trying to revolutionize the way soldiers receive information, respond to orders, adapt to stress, and perform while sleep
111 The LRAD is another invention of Elwood Norris of American Technology Corporation.
112 Jurgen Altmann, “Acoustic Weapons: A Prospective Assessment,” Science and Global Security, Vol. 9, p. 13. 113 Marshall Sella, “The Sound of Things to Come”, New York Times, March 23, 2003.
114 Amanda Onion, “RNC to Feature Unusual Forms of Sound”, Aug. 25, 2004, ABC News
115 Associated Press, “Israel May Use Sound Weapon On Settlers”, 6/10/2005. Available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2005/06/10/israel-may-use-sound-weap_n_2444.html
29

deprived.
TMS is being developed for military purposes using electrical impulses at close proximity to the skull to enhance mood, affect sleep patterns, and increase creativity.116 This technology is beginning to replace electro-shock therapy. DARPA granted a contract to the Medical University of South Carolina to research now to improve a soldier’s performance. A soldier’s reaction to stress may be less intense, or a 40-hour flight will allow for the soldier to remain awake without the side effects of sleep deprivation.117 Few, if any, understand the long-term effects of TMS, given its relative infancy in the overall field of Augmented Cognition. Does TMS produce unknown neurological effects ten, twenty, fifty years down the road? To what extent is TMS being researched? TMS is part of the overall field of Augmented Cognition. In essence, Augmented Cognition allows a human to interact with a computer through brain waves. The idea is to enhance a person’s cognitive capabilities in the area of memory, learning, attention, visualization, and decision-making.
One application of augmented cognition allows a user to monitor a person’s brain functions and send anticipatory commands to the person being monitored. For instance, a military command unit will be able to monitor a pilot in a cockpit, and based on the sensory output of the soldier, the base command can input messages directly into the pilot’s brain to improve performance. DARPA describes this as a human computer symbiosis whereby, “This research will enable development of closed loop human-computer technologies, where the state of the user is measured, analyzed, and automatically adapted to by the computational system.”118 The increase in human-computer relations and the ability to manipulate and control a person’s senses, memory, and neural output has wide implications.
The basic ability to enter a person’s mind is not a futuristic fantasy. This is real and in prototype. DARPA began this research in 1983.119 The Internet has become a focal point in our lives with reliance for information and communication. Our interaction and intimacy with computers is increasingly pervasive, as is our exposure to the field of augmented cognition. DARPA does not address the implications of such symbiosis, or the dilemma of he extent to which a person can or should be manipulated. The use of this technology is used for military purposes but it may not be long until it is used to “improve” the factory worker, prisoners, or the mentally ill.
116 “Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: An Introduction”, Grant Balfour, v1.0 – May 6, 2002 available at: www.cognitiveliberty.org/issues/TMS_index.html
117 MUSC To Develop Brain Stimulation Device For Military, Charleston, SC, May 9, 2002, www.musc.edu/pr/darpa.htm, “The overall goal of the project is to use the unique resources at MUSC’s Brain Stimulation Laboratory and Center for Advanced Imaging Research to determine if: 1. non-invasive stimulation of the brain can improve a soldier’s performance, 2. and then design, manufacture and test a prototype of a system that would be capable of delivering this technology in the field.”
118 Improving Human Performance Through Advanced Cognitive System Technology, Dylan D Schmorrow and Amy A Kruse, LCDR MSC USN, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Arlington, VA, Strategic Analysis Inc., Arlington, VA, Available at: http://ntsa.metapress.com/(2pq1al55mfylqgf0n3cvjc45)/app/home/contribution.asp?referrer=parent&backto=issue,91,16 7;journal,5,7;linkingpublicationresults,1:113340,1
119 New Generation Technology: A strategic plan for its Development and Application to Critical Problems in Defense, DARPA, 1983.
30

The Implant
Another realm of brain research is the field of neural implants. Until recently, implants were a futuristic fantasy. Current advances in the private and military sectors have produced an implant that can allow a victim of a spinal cord injury to walk again or give an amputee the ability to control her leg with her mind. In the private sector, Cyberkinetics is leading the way to liberating some people from wheelchairs. This technology is a path to a more functional way of life, but it is also possible that the use of implants could be used for malevolence.
John Donohoe, founder, chief scientific officer, and director of Cyberkinetics, addressed the issue of mind control and neural implants. When asked if creating a brain-machine interface will open the door to mind control Donohoe responded, “We do that all the time already. Advertising is mind control. Even pharmaceutical agents are a form of mind control. When people have behaviors that deviate far from the norm, they are given medications that bring their mind back into the realm of behavior that we call normal. If a child were to have a seizure and became unconscious because of the seizure, and we controlled his mind so that he did not have seizures, that would be a wonderful thing. We want to do that.”120
The Experts121
Many scientists, philosophers, psychologists, and military analysts have written on the possibilities of accumulating information directly from the human brain as well as controlling human beings for various governmental and militaristic purposes using the aforementioned technologies. What follows are excerpts from recent interviews conducted by the authors with notable experts focusing on the capabilities of US EMF technologies and concerns about human rights and cognitive liberty. We contacted twenty-two experts in the fields of EMF technologies, many would not comment. The following are quotes from four experts who were willing to publicly address the subject.
Vladimir Nikolaevich Lopatin
Director of The Republican Scientific Research Institute of Intellectual Property, Moscow, former Deputy of the State Duma of the Russian Federation on the Vologda from 1995 to 1999, and Senior Assistant to the General Public Prosecutor of the Russian Federation. During the 1990s Lopatin was active in the Russian Federation’s banning of EMF technologies for military purposes.122
120 Neuroscience: John Donoghue By Aaron J. Sender, Discover Vol. 25 No. 11, November 2004, Mind & Brain
121 Gaining interviews with DARPA scientists and officials at the Human Effectiveness Directorate at Brooks proved troublesome. For information about current projects, see DARPA Defense Science Program, specifically COL Geoffrey Ling, M.D., PhD’s program “Human-Assisted Neural Devices” and Amy Kruse’s Improving War fighter Information Intake Under Stress (AugCog) and Neurotechnology for Intelligence Analysts. At the Human Effectiveness Directorate see Andrei G. Pakhomov , Yahya Akyel , Olga N. Pakhomova , Bruce E. Stuck , Michael R. Murphy, “Current state and implications of research on biological effects of millimeter waves: A review of the literature”, in Bioelectromagnetics, Volume 19, Issue 7 , Pages 393 – 413.
122 The following are excerpts of an interview with Lopatin translated by U.C. Davis student, Tatiana Kanare.
31

The following are quotes from Lopatin:
“At the same time, the necessity of protection from information weapons, information terrorism and information war is being discussed more often during the last years.”
“…according to the Security Department of the Russian Federation, directors of Russian Special Services and the Ministry of Defense of Russia. Based on the data of special services, by the beginning of the 21st century expenses for purchasing means of information war increased within the last 15 years in the USA in four times and are ahead of all armament programs. Information confrontation during the times of a regular war began to change to a new, higher level – information war.”
“According to article 6 of the Federal Law “On weapons,” as of July 30, 2001, on the territory of the Russian Federation it is forbidden to circulate as means of civil and service weapons: ‘weapons and other objects, destructive ability of which is based on the use of electro-magnetic, light, heat, infrasound and ultrasound radiation and which have output parameters that exceed the amounts, set by state standards of the Russian Federation and norms of the federal body of executive power responsible for healthcare, and also mentioned above weapons and objects, manufactured outside of the territory of the Russian Federation’.”
Carol Smith
British psychoanalyst, private practice in London, member of The College of Psychoanalysts and the Institute for Psychotherapy and Social Studies and member of their Ethics Committee.
Asked if there are human rights concerns associated with these particular non-lethal weapons, Smith answered, “Yes – it depends though by what is meant by ‘the wrong hands’. For people who are targeted for experimentation – all such devices need testing – all hands are the wrong hands, be they government, private commercial, or sadistic/commercial. Ionatron, a large company based in Arizona, developed plasma channel directed energy weapons and state in their website: ‘What are LIPC laser-guided directed-energy weapons? Laser-guided directed-energy weapons work like “man-made lightning” to disable people or things. LIPC technology is Ionatron’s proprietary type of laser-guided directed-energy weapon. LIPC stands for laser-induced plasma channel; the plasma channel is how the energy is directed through the air at the target. Extremely fast femto-second lasers cause light to break into filaments, which form a plasma channel that conducts the energy like a virtual wire. This technology can be adjusted for non-lethal or lethal use’.”
Discussing neurotechnology, Smith adds, “Brain mapping indicated to us the pleasure centers of the brain. TMS is the accessing these with rapidly changing magnetic fields to produce electrical fields.
If the right hand rule is operative, the effect of inducing electrical fields by changing magnetic fields improves mood.
(Lenz’s law, however, gives the direction of the induced electromotive force (EMF) resulting from electromagnetic induction, thus: The EMF induced in an electric circuit always acts in such a
32
direction that the current it drives around a closed circuit produces a magnetic field which opposes the change in magnetic flux.) In other words, it would be possible to create depression and a feeling of overwhelming hopelessness by the induction of a current into the electrical circuit of the brain, which opposed the change in magnetic flux.123
“In 2004, The US Air Force Directorate: Controlled Effects gives a clear picture of objectives: “The Controlled Effects long-term challenge focuses technology developments in three primary areas Measured Global Force Projection looks at the exploitation of electromagnetic and other non- conventional force capabilities against facilities and equipment to achieve strategic, tactical, and lethal and non lethal force projection around the world. Controlled Personnel Effects investigates technologies to make selected adversaries think and act according to our needs. Dominant Remote Control seeks to control, at a distance, an enemy’s vehicles, sensors, communications, and information systems and manipulate them for military purposes. The S&T Planning Review panel looked first at extending the applications of advanced military technologies currently under development and then at new, revolutionary technologies for their military significance.”
“For the Controlled Personnel Effects capability, the S&T panel explored the potential for targeting individuals with non lethal force, from a militarily useful range, to make selected adversaries think or act according to our needs. Through the application of non-lethal force, it is possible to physically influence or incapacitate personnel. Advanced technologies could enable the war fighter to remotely create physical sensations such as pressure or temperature changes. A current example of this technology is Active Denial, a non-lethal counter-personnel millimeter wave system that creates a skin heating sensation to repel an individual or group of people without harm. By studying and modeling the human brain and nervous system, the ability to mentally influence or confuse personnel is also possible. Through sensory deception, it may be possible to create synthetic images, or holograms, to confuse an individual’s visual sense or, in a similar manner, confuse his senses of sound, taste, touch, or smell. Through cognitive engineering, scientists can develop a better understanding of how an individual’s cognitive processes (pattern recognition, visual conditioning, and difference detection) affect his decision-making processes. Once understood, scientists could use these cognitive models to predict a person’s behavior under a variety of conditions with the potential to affect an adversary’s mission accomplishment via a wide range of personnel effects.”124
Dr. Dean Radin
Former positions at AT&T Bell Labs and GTE Labs on advanced telecommunications R&D, appointments at Princeton University, University of Edinburgh, University of Nevada, SRI International and Interval Research Corporation, co-founder of the Boundary Institute, Senior Scientist at the Institute of Noetic Sciences. Adjunct appointment at Sonoma State University, Distinguished Consulting Faculty for Saybrook Graduate School.
“I have spoken with experts in this area (extremely low frequency) about health effects in general
123 To access Lenz’s Law online, go to: http://www.launc.tased.edu.au/online/sciences/physics/ Lenz’s.html 124 For the complete briefing see the Air Force Research Lab website at http://www.afrlhorizons.com/Briefs/Jun04/DE0401.html.
33

and the consensus seems to be that non-ionizing EM radiation definitely does have effects on living systems, from individual cells to human behavior. The principle health concern is childhood leukemia associated with proximity to high-tension lines. There the epidemiological evidence is fairly clear. On other sources of EM, like cell phones and microwaves, the jury still seems to be out, although I strongly suspect that directed microwaves at non-ionizing strength can induce all sorts of behavioral changes through direct influence of the nervous system. This comes from my contacts in the non-lethal weapons arena, which is often lumped in with the hysteria over supposed psychic mind-control. All things being equal, I’d rather see development of non-lethal weapons than lethal ones. How such weapons are actually used is another matter, of course.”
“The question is, were there ever elements of the intel/military world engaged in experiments on human behavior (not mind) control? Yes, many decades ago, during the cold war. But is such work still taking place? I don’t know, because if it is it would be a black project and then by definition only those involved would know of it. I hope no such projects are underway, because I do believe that EMF, used in nefarious ways, can destabilize the brain, and potentially generate feelings of violence or apathy. But I very strongly doubt that specific thoughts or intentions or actions can be induced”
Dr. Nick Begich
He is the editor of Earthpulse Flashpoints, a new-science book series and published articles in science, politics and education and is a well known lecturer, having presented throughout the United States and in nineteen countries. Begich has served as an expert witness and speaker before the European Parliament and has spoken on various issues for groups representing citizen concerns, statesmen and elected officials, scientists and others. He is the publisher and co-owner of Earthpulse Press and Executive Director of The Lay Institute of Technology, Inc. a Texas non-profit corporation.
“There are several ways that microwaves can affect humans. For instance, the Sheriff and weapons that can heat the skin for crowd control do what the military states but they are capable of much more. The thermal heating weapons act like a car radio; you can change the frequencies to get different effects. The electromagnetic weapons send an impulse through the nervous system. They can transfer sounds, like Woody Norris’ directed acoustic weapons, which is contracted to the US government. It modulates a signal that is a radio frequency, which can be changed to affect certain organs. It can override an organ like the heart or the liver. So changing the perimeter is like changing the broadcast on the radio. These extremely low frequencies also have the capability to send messages directly into the head when only the receiver can hear it. (see the 1985 Radiofrequency Radiation Dosimetry Handbook).”
“The handbook talks about electromagnetics and about the rapid healing of bones. The frequencies can also be used to manipulate the brain and create a disequilibrium. These frequencies can also imbed signals on radio broadcasts to create a feeling of fear or anxiety. The US military would embed these signals on the Muslim prayer broadcasts during the first Gulf War. This was called Project Solo.”
34
“During the 1990’s, in both presidential administrations, non-lethal weapons such as these and others received priority funding. The Secretary of Energy under Clinton, O’Leary, warned that over a 40 year period, 500,000 had been unwitting test subjects for military research on non-lethal weapons, including MKULTRA who claims among many victims, Ted Kaczinky, the Unabomber. There is no way to know who these people are or how to help them because there is paranoia in the military and no oversight in Congress. These black projects probably don’t even make it to the President.”
“The problem is that the military’s role is to be paranoid and think up scenarios where the worst can happen then prepare for this in order to protect the people from a hypothetical future event. But there is little to no oversight. The Senate Intelligence Committee is made up of people like Ted Stephens who thinks the internet is made up of pipes and tubes. These people do not have the required background knowledge to ask the right questions. According to the defense budget report, 40% of the budget is dedicated to black projects. There is no oversight and no public knowledge. In the European Union, things are much different.”
“In February 1998, I testified before the European Union parliament for an hour and a half and convinced them of the detrimental effects of non lethal weapons on humans, their behavior and their minds. The EU was convinced and passed a resolution banning the use of weapons that can manipulate a person (see Parliament Resolution A4-005/99 entitled “Resolution on the Environment, Security, and Foreign Policy” passed on January 29, 1999). During the hearings, the US representative and NATO representatives sat in the back and declined to participate when asked. In the US, there is no such resolution or anything remotely close to being considered by any member of Congress. There is no concern for it in the US because no one knows about them.”
“During the 1980’s and 1990’s, there were a lot of papers that came out of the Naval War College and from top military officials that advocated using weapons that would cut down on the carnage seen by the American public in order to maintain public support. There was another paper that discusses how people will give up their liberties if they lived in a climate of fear by an outside enemy. If the US public knew about these weapons and what they could potentially asked to give up, their minds, the public would resist. So now, these weapons are being developed by the companies that comprise the industrial military complex who are immune from FOIA requests.”
“Without oversight, these weapons will a government to have absolute control. These weapons are most certainly in the hands of most industrialized countries. China certainly has them as intelligence reports released by the CIA reveal claims about these new concept weapons. There needs to be a debate in the public sphere because while these weapons appear frightening, they have amazing therapeutic potentials. There is the possibility of quicker healing and curing disease and what is just as important about government transparency concerning weapons is the transparency of life saving science being kept from the public. If we have the ability to cure and the government or military hides this, we have just as big a problem.”
Summary Analysis of Expert Interviews
35
From the four interviews we were able to complete, there is a clear consensus of concern for the potentiality of human rights abuses with EMF weapons testing and use. They collectively agree that the US is the leading global researcher in this area and spends increasingly more money building this technology. It is also clear that we know very little about the actual levels of experimentation, research, and capabilities of EMF weapons technologies due to high levels of US government security.
Department of Defense Military Contractors
Military contractors run our wars in concert with power elites. The corporation also has the power to determine which studies will reach the public.125 To be certain, the military, in the interest of budgets, will allow negative or alarming studies to remain unreported or lost in a sea of classified documents.
The power of the military and DOD contractors is staggering. In the interest of national security and lessons learned from an open democracy during the 1970s and the 1990s, operations have become more black. In essence, no one can know with certainty what our military, government, or corporations have in store for the world, though, we have some clues.
Michael Vickers, senior adviser to the Secretary of Defense for the 2005 Quadrennial Defense Review and principal strategist for the largest covert action program in the CIA’s history, recently testified on the importance of black operations:
“US Special Operations Command’s (SOCOM) emphasis after 9/11 has been to make white Special Operations Forces (SOF) more gray and black SOF more black. It is imperative, however, that white and black SOF be integrated fully from a strategic perspective.”126
The money involved in the non-lethal weapons industry is growing and military contractors are reaping the profits. According to Defense Industry Daily, Aaardvark Tactical, Inc. in Azusa, CA won a $50 million contract to develop non-lethal weapons, anti-terrorism capabilities, and riot gear.127 Ionatron was awarded a $12 million contract to develop the Laser Induced Plasma Channel technology which produces man-made lightening bolts.128 SAIC received a $49 million in November 2004 to develop High Power Microwave and other directed energy systems while Fiore Industries received a $16.35 million contract for similar technology and ITT received a $7.85 million contract
125 From Microwave News, July 2006, “Radiation Research and The Cult of Negative Results:” “When we investigated who sponsored the microwave-DNA papers published in Radiation Research, we discovered that four out of five were paid for by the wireless industry —notably Motorola— and/or the US Air Force, both of which have a long history of trying to control or suppress EMF research. Indeed, industry and the USAF paid for more than 75% of all the negative genotox studies, that is those published in all the various journals.”
126 According to Michael Vickers biography at the Center for Strategic Defense Budget Studies’ website, “The paramilitary operation that drove the Soviet army out of Afghanistan and played a major role in ending the Cold War.” http://www.csbaonline.org/6About_Us/2Staff_Directory/Michael_Vickers.htm
127 “$50M for USMC Riot Gear, Protection Items, and Non-Lethal Weapons”, Defense Industry Daily, July 27, 2005. 128 “Ionatron Facing Scrutiny Over Laser Projects”, Defense Industry Daily, May 24, 2006.
36

for the same in 2000.129 Fiore Industries received a $7.1 million for High Power Microwave Research and Experiment Program as early as 1994 and the same year Hughes Missile Systems Company received a $6.6 million contract for High Power Microwave Suppression of Enemy Air Defense Technology.130 Lockheed Martin secured a deal with DARPA in 2005 to continue the development of the Space Based Radar Antenna Technology in a $19.5 million contract.131 According to the Lockheed press release, the technology, “could significantly increase global persistent surveillance coverage”.
In May of 2006, the Air Force issued $24 million in contracts for “Electro Magnetic Effects Research and Development” to Northrup Gruman, Voss Scientific, Lockheed Martin, Electro Magnetic Applications, and SAIC among others.132 The DOD viewed electromagnetic research and development as a key component in future wars as early as the 1990s. Emmett Paige Jr., Assistant Secretary of Defense for Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence declared in 1996 that, “Well over a decade ago, a Soviet general reportedly said something like ‘to prevail in the next conflict, one must control the electromagnetic spectrum.’ That statement proved true in the Bacca Valley and on deserts in Iraq. The Department of Defense is committed to ensuring that “in the next conflict it is we who will control the spectrum. We know its value’.133 Increasingly, the value of non lethal weapons continues to rise as they produce fewer images of death in the media than traditional weapons.”
In addition to DOD contractors, the realm of non-lethal weapons extends into the universities with millions of dollars in scholarships and research fellowships. Pennsylvania State University, sponsors the Institute for Non-Lethal Defense Technologies (INLDT), the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey has the Stress and Motivated Behavior Institute, University of New Hampshire houses the Non-lethal Technology Innovation Center, and many US military schools have classes directly related to non-lethal weapons technology.134 There are also numerous conferences each year hosted by the Department of Defense, contractors and universities.135 The business of non-lethal weapons is expanding and will continue to grow. In 2006, the Joint Non- Lethal Weapons Directorate received $43.9 million compared to $25.8 million in 2000.136
Ionatron’s website states that, “…the market for new directed-energy applications (will increase to $12.7 billion over the next ten years for the defense market alone.”137
129 “USAF Detachment 8 Continues US Research Into EMP-Microwave Weapons”, Defense Industry Daily, March 7, 2006.
130 ibid.
131 Lockheed Martin news release, May 23, 2005, “Lockheed Martin Selected for Continued Development of the Innovative Space Based Radar Antenna Technology (ISAT)”.
132 US Department of Defense Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs), No. 169-06 March 01, 2006. 133 United States Department of Defense Speech, Volume 11, Number 83, “Electromagnetic Spectrum: Key to Success in Future Conflicts”, http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/index.html.
134 See Industrial College of the Armed Forces, Naval War College, and the US Army War College course offerings on their websites.
135 Bunker, Robert J., “Non-Lethal Weapons Conferences”, Military Review, vol. 80, no. 2, Mar./Apr. 2000, pp. 103-109. 136 Pappalardo, Joe, “Homeland Defense Plan Favors Non-Lethal Technology”, National Defense Magazine, June 2005. 137 Direct quote from the Ionatron website: http://www.ionatron.com/default.aspx?id=4, accessed August 2006.
37

Despite Clinton’s reforms on human testing, the government, military and the corporation will undoubtedly want to test these weapons on humans whenever possible. Easiest to test would be prisoners in undisclosed CIA detention centers, civilians in war torn regions, and even US citizens in protest crowds or civilian jails. In addition to the rubber bullets and pepper spray, which are common in many police forces, new concept weapons are also in use. Perhaps soon Americans will learn first- hand, the effects of the new human control technologies.
However, hundreds of people continue to assert that a person or persons, whom they do not know, have been targeting them with electromagnetic weapons in a widespread campaign of either illegal experimentation or outright persecution.
These experiences involved a number of discrete phenomena:
Hearing voices when no one was present.
Feeling sensations of burning, itching, tickling, or pressure with no apparent physical cause.
Sleeplessness and anxiety as a result of “humming” or “buzzing”.
Loss of bodily control, such as twitching or jerking of an arm or leg suddenly and without control.
Unexpected emotional states, such as a sudden overwhelming feeling of dread, rage, lust or sorrow that passes as quickly as it arises.138
The levels of research on directed energy is now large enough to support a Directed Energy (DE) Professional Society made up of private contractors and Department of Defense officials with security clearances. They have been holding high security symposiums since spring 2001 including a planned meeting set for March 2007. The following is from the Directed Energy Professional Society’s website.
“The Directed Energy (DE) Systems Symposium (March 2007) will focus on systems aspects of DE in a limited-attendance environment. The Systems Symposium consists of co-located technical sessions organized by five separate conferences, with joint technical and plenary sessions to encourage discussion outside narrow technical limits. Attendance at all sessions is limited to US citizens with classified visit requests on file.
138 This list of symptoms was compiled from material available on the website of Californians Against Human Rights Abuses (CAHRA) and can be found at www.mindjustice.org. In addition the authors conducted interviews with seven individuals who wish to have their identities protected and who presented anecdotal and physical evidence to support their assertions. There is, however, little in the public domain that conclusively states the existence of direct human manipulation by governments, militaries or private companies/researchers in the current day, MKULTRA and other historic programs notwithstanding. However, there are many organizations that seek to help these people including concerned scientists, Russian Duma members and EU parliamentarians, psychologists and academics. A list of organizations follows in Appendix A.
38

Symposium Highlights
Beam Control Conference
Directed Energy Modeling and Simulation Conference Employment of Directed Energy Weapons Conference High Energy Laser Lethality Conference
High Power Microwave Systems and Effects Conference”139
The following are three course descriptions from the October Directed Energy Conference:
Course 9.†Military Utility Analysis for DE (Direct Energy) Systems Classification: Secret
Course Description: This course will provide an overview of military worth analysis for DE weapon systems. The course will include a description of four areas of systems engineering assessment that are brought together to form military worth analysis. These are: 1) weapon system concept performance trade studies, 2) target vulnerability assessment, 3) engagement-level system operational effectiveness assessment, and 4) war gaming and mission/campaign level analysis. Each of these areas will be covered during the short course, with emphasis on the elements that are drawn from each of these areas to support military worth analysis. The course will particularly emphasize methods for assessing system level effectiveness in the context of traditional weapon effectiveness tools such as the Joint Munitions Effectiveness Manuals (JMEMs) and for providing data on DE weapons effectiveness to mission and campaign level analysis tools and to models and simulations used to support war gaming.
Topics to be covered include:
Definition of military worth analysis
Elements of DE weapon system performance trade studies and how they feed military worth analysis Target vulnerability assessment and its use to support weapon effectiveness
Adapting standard weapon “kill” criteria to measure benefit of DE effects
Joint Munitions Effectiveness Manuals (JMEMs) weapon effectiveness models
Military utility studies
Modeling and simulation to support war games and war fighter exercises
Mission and campaign level modeling
Course 10. Laser Lethality Classification: Secret
139 Directed Energy Professional Society, Monterey, CA, 19-23 March 2007, Directed Energy Modeling and Simulation Conference 2007, http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/DEMSconf07.html
39

Course Description: This course reviews laser material interactions over parameter ranges of interest for weapons applications. Fundamental considerations of the optical coupling of the laser energy into the material will be presented. This will be followed by physics-based treatments of the response of metals, organic-based materials, and ceramics to the laser irradiation.
Metals: Simple cw, one-dimensional treatments will be utilized to illustrate the general principles of the response of metals to laser radiation, but two-dimensional cases, phase changes, and pulsed effects will be discussed as well.
Organic Based Materials: The effects of high-energy laser (HEL) radiation on organic based materials, including fiber reinforced composites, plastics and coatings will be reviewed. Materials will range from char formers and charring ablators to clean ablators. The relationship between the pyrolysis processes taking place in various materials during HEL radiation will be reviewed as a function of material composition, form and structure.
Ceramic Materials: Considerations of the response of ceramic shapes when laser loading is added to in-service stresses will be presented. An understanding of these responses from models, which are based on a combination of the thermo-mechanical stress calculations and statistically based fracture initiation, will be presented.
Course 11.†Directed Energy Bioeffects Classification: Secret
Course Description and Topics: This course will introduce the basics of the biological effects of Directed Energy on cells, tissues, organisms, and humans, with particular emphasis on the influence of such effects on the development of use of Directed-Energy-Emitting technologies.
The student will learn about the mechanisms, resulting damage, and mission impact of laser-tissue interaction. The student will learn what tissues are most susceptible to laser damage based on wavelength, exposure duration, and irradiance. The potential mission-impact of sub0-threshold, threshold, and suprathreshold exposures will be discussed.
Student will understand the nature of RF bioeffects research, including human/animal studies, modeling and simulation, and biotechnology approaches. Students will become familiar with current state of knowledge on potential health effects RF, such as cancer, memory loss, and birth defects. Students will become familiar with basis and structure of current RF safety standards, comparison between competing standards, and how RF safety standards are applied. Students will be instructed on common RF measurement equipment and important factors for investigating potential RF overexposures.
Topics to be covered include:
Laser damage of the eye (retina and cornea)
40

Laser damage to the skin
Laser safety standards
Laser damage as a function of energy, pulse duration, wavelength, and spot size RF bioeffects research and the current scientific consensus on RF hazards
RF safety standards
RF measurement basics
Investigating RF overexposures”140
The US Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate released a paper in 2004 which presents “Crowd Control Modeling and Simulation.” This report discusses behavioral changes human populations.141 That the Department of Defense calls for new weapons systems designed to work on the psychological underpinnings of a population should give human rights activists great cause for alarm. The use of electromagnetic weapons to alter the emotional state, hamper the ability of an enemy or US citizens, to think clearly, and result in chaos and pain are morally problematic for a number of reasons:
1. Creating fear, anxiety confusion and irrational behavior within an individual or a population is counterproductive to the operations of a free society and to the execution of warfare. Chaos only breeds the need for greater and greater means of physical repression; irrational behavior is by definition unpredictable and as such provides significant difficulty when the task is to secure an area.
2. These weapons leave no tell tale clues. There are no bullet holes or gross damage (with the exception of those designed to maim, burn or explode targets).
3. They are operated from a great distance, meaning that the operator has no feedback as to the effects of his or her actions. This provides us with a very dangerous circumstance very similar to Millgram’s experiment where we can predict with certainty gross abuses of power.
4. Any device that invades a persons mind, either through induction of “evoked potentials” through electromagnetic means or through the various “crazy-making” tactics employed in both information warfare and psychological operations is a violation of human rights and cognitive liberty.
In terms of authorizing and administering tests of radioactive substances and other tests on unsuspecting members of the public, history shows that people without ethical standards can rise to positions of great responsibility and once ensconced in such positions of trust, produce the most horrifying abuses without fear of reprisal. When layers of secrecy overlay the activities of otherwise rational and intelligent men, the failings of their hearts more readily show. In the case of actually attempting to control human behavior through both overt and covert means our departments of defense and intelligence agencies, both subordinate to the executive branch of government have historically proven incapable of protecting the public and undeserving of the trust given them to
140 Directed Energy Professional Society, 2006 Directed Energy Symposium Short Courses, 30 October 2006 Albuquerque, New Mexico: http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/DEsymp06ShortCourse.html
141 Louis Slesin, “Radiation Research and The Cult of Negative Results”, Microwave News, July 31, 2006.
41

perform their functions for the public good.
Total Surveillance: Cognitive Liberties vs. National Security
Today the US and the U.K. are becoming total surveillance societies in the name of national security. London, like cities across the US, is equipped with cameras citywide. Daily human actions are recorded with video and voice recognition device, while our email and computer usage is monitored. Increased demand for resources, the erosion of middle classes, war, poverty, and environmental disasters are historically factors leading to social uprisings and infiltration of political borders. As governments reinforce the threat of terror, people increasingly turn to their governments for protection.
The US has a long history of human rights violations through harassment, telephone tapping, video surveillance, behavior manipulation, torture, drug-induced states of conscience and psychological control. Congress’s passage of the Military Commission Act of 2006 put universal human rights outside the scope of US policy. Today, the US government is using the most technologically advanced forms of surveillance and control, along with the propaganda of fear and intimidation against its citizens. The US engages in covert torture, covert imprisonment, increased censorship and the massive secret classification of government documents.142
A prominent neuroscientist, Francis Crick stated in 1994, that “your joys and your sorrows, your memories and your ambitions, your sense of personal identity and free will, are in fact no more than the behavior of a vast assembly of nerve cells and their associated molecules.”143
Is it possible that today’s scientists in the employ of the US neo-conservative global-dominance policy elites believe the same? According to Steven Rose, there are, “bad hats” in neuroscience: “There are always opportunists. The current affairs of our country have produced many.”144 The abundance of neuro-research has led to the development of several products by private business in the name of national security, including brain fingerprinting.145
John Norseen, a neuroscientist interested in Biofusion, the relationship between humans and
142 For verification of US torturing people to death see, “US Operatives Torture Detainees to Death in Afghanistan and Iraq”, Project Censored Top 10 Uncensored Stories of 2006: http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2007/index.htm#7
143 Michael Shermer, “Astonishing Mind: Francis Crick 1916–2004 recollections on the life of a scientist”.
144 Steven Rose, The 21st Century Brain: Explaining, Mending and Manipulating the Mind, Jonathan Cape Publishing, March 31, 2005.
145 The official explanation of Brain Fingerprinting from Dr. Lawrence Farwell: “Brain Fingerprinting testing is a scientific technique to determine whether or not specific information is stored in an individual’s brain. We do this by measuring brain-wave responses to words, phrases, sounds or pictures presented by a computer. We present details about a crime, training or other types of specific knowledge, mixed in a sequence with other, irrelevant items. We use details that the person being tested would have encountered in the course of committing a crime, but that an innocent person would have no way of knowing. We can tell by the brainwave response if a person recognizes the stimulus or not. If the suspect recognizes the details of the crime, this indicates that he has a record of the crime stored in his brain.” For more research, see the Brain Wave Science site, the official internet identity of Brain Fingerprinting Laboratories at http://www.brainwavescience.com/Publications.php.
42

computers, says, “If this research pans out you can begin to manipulate what someone is thinking even before they know it.” Norseen says he is agnostic on the moral ramifications of this research. He feels that he is not a “mad” scientist – just a dedicated one. “The ethics don’t concern me,” he says, “but they should concern someone else.”146
We, the authors of this report, contend that human ethics should concern every person who believes in human rights and desires control over their own mind and body. Our brains control our bodies, actions, and thought processes. If the government and the scientists they employ perceive that the human mind as simply a collection of neurons, it then becomes possible to justify the surveillance of the human mind and body for national security purposes.
The control and manipulation of a human brain is a terrifying possibility. Lieutenant Colonel Timothy L. Thomas, US Army (ret), published an article in the military journal Parameters which likens the mind as a new battlefield. He quotes a Russian army major in relation to mind wars, “It is completely clear that the state which is first to create such weapons will achieve incomparable superiority.” Thomas expresses concern about “information dominance” though he stops short on the moral implications.147
Under the cover of secrecy provided by claims of national security, researchers in service to higher circle policy elites have implanted electrodes into human subjects to control minds and tortured prisoners and the mentally ill in efforts to find better “brainwashing” techniques. They have poisoned thousands with atomic testing, experimented on young children using drugs, trauma and hypnosis, sprayed major cities with biological agents to prepare for a future attack, overthrown governments, instituted mass killings, and engaged in every form of information distortion.
The current “War on Terror” has revealed to the public some of the tools that the military has been developing for decades. High profile weapons systems flash across the nightly reports of the major news networks, including highflying Stealth bombers on grainy green tinted video from the noses of “smart” bombs. On occasion glimpses are given through the media of what one article dubbed “Wonder Weapons.”148 Weapons that fall under the military category of “Non-Lethal Weapons.” In fact the general position of the agencies who do comment on weapons that exploit the lower end of the electromagnetic spectrum is that they have no biological effect at all, except for what are dubbed “thermal effects,” in essence heating of human cells.149
Research into this subject has shown that this position is inaccurate, and that the effects of electromagnetic radiation weapons on human beings are in fact both chilling and dramatic. As reported in 2001, the statement of Dr. Eldon Byrd should be considered with great weight:
146 Douglas Pasternak, “John Norseen Reading your mind – and injecting smart thoughts”, US News and World Report, January 3-10, 2000.
147 Timothy L. Thomas, The Mind Has No Firewall, Parameters, Spring 1998, pp. 84-92.
148 Douglas Pasternak, “Wonder Weapons”, Newsweek August 22, 1994 p. 57.
149 H. Pollack, “Epidemiologic data on American personnel in the Moscow embassy”, Bull N Y Acad Med., 1979 Dec;55(11):1182-6.
43

“A medical engineer, Eldon Byrd, reported a case that illustrates this point. After working on the Polaris submarine, which carried long-range nuclear weapons, Byrd developed non-lethal weapons with reversible effects. He regarded this as a humanitarian alternative to ‘punching holes in people and having their blood leak out’ in battle. His inventions used magnetic fields at biologically active wave frequencies to affect brain function. Byrd could put animals to sleep at a distance and influence their movements. When the success of his research became evident, suddenly he was pulled off the project and it went “black.” His believes the electromagnetic resonance weapons he developed have been used for psychological control of civilians rather than for exigencies in battle. That is, to ensure his participation, he was uninformed about the true nature of the project. Byrd’s case also illustrates how morally tolerable operations may transition to morally intolerable operations, or at least rise above the atrocity line”150
Power elites who fund and support efforts at supplanting the will of the people do so from on high. Their ability to redirect public attention to ward external threats and away from their own motivations in effect silences opposition to their programs. By controlling the flow of information in society, the power elites provide the public with a limited choice in all matters that pertain to machinations of government and corporate control. Given more advanced technologies for the control of information unscrupulous individuals who ascribe to a “might makes right” philosophy may will find the ways and means of employing these technologies against those who would oppose their plans. The dangers here are great, in that the individual who would direct the torture and killing of innocents is usually removed from the actual fact. It is left up to lesser authorities to administer the beatings, bullets, and mind/body bending technologies.
For the US Government to unilaterally declare that our country will not comply with international human rights laws, nor uphold the core values of our nation’s foundation is an indication of extremism that supersedes the values and beliefs of the American people. When such extremism exists we need to take seriously the founders’ declaration that, “ to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.” (Declaration of Independence 1776)
_________________________________________________________________________________ Peter Phillips is a Professor of Sociology at Sonoma State University and Director of Project Censored. Principle researchers on this report were Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton. Lew Brown holds a degree in Psychology and was the main writer and researcher on the historical sections of
150 Military and Civilian Perspectives on the Ethics of Intelligence— Report on a Workshop at the Department of Philosophy Claremont Graduate University, September 29, 2000, Jean Maria Arrigo, Ph.D. Virginia Foundation for the Humanities and Public Policy Paper presented to The Joint Services Conference on Professional Ethics Springfield, Virginia January 25-26, 2001
44

this paper. Bridget Thornton is a senior level History major at Sonoma State University and the primary researcher and writer for the new EMF technologies portion. Final editing was completed by Trish Boreta with Project Censored. Special thanks to Andy Roth Ph.D. for his editorial review.
Appendix A
ORGANIZATIONS CONCERNED WITH ILLEGAL EXPERIMENTATION AND INDIVIDUAL VICTIMS
Angelic Harp Foundation
2219 Lexford LN.
Houston, Texas 77080-5216 713-461-0623
Fax: 713-461-0091 http://angelicharpfoundation.org
Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics
P.O. Box 73481
Davis, CA 95617-3481 USA Fax: 205. 449. 3119
COPUS
Committee on the Public Understanding of Science The Royal Society
6-9 Carlton House Terrace
London
SW1Y 5AG
United Kingdom
Fax +44 (0)20 7839 5561 http://www.copus.org.uk
Federation of American Scientists
1717 K St., NW Suite 209 Washington, DC 20036 Voice: (202)546-3300 Fax: (202)675-1010 http://www.fas.org
The Lay Institute
Nick Begich, Executive Director Dallas, Texas info@layinstitute.org
Mind Justice
45
Cheryl Welsh, Executive Director E-mail: welsh@mindjustice.org
The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
Signalistgatan
9 SE-169 70
Solna Sweden
Phone: +46-8-655 97 00 Fax: +46-8-655 97 33 E-mail: sipri@sipri.org
Sunshine Project Germany
The Sunshine Project Scheplerstrasse 78 22767 Hamburg Germany
Phone: +49 40 431 88 001 Fax: +49 40 67 50 39 88
Sunshine Project USA
PO Box 41987
Austin TX 78704
USA
Phone/Fax: +1 512 494 0545 http://www.sunshine-project.org
World Transhumanist Association
PO Box 128
Willington CT 06279 USA http://www.transhumanism.org
Additional References
Acoustic Weapons – A Perspective
Jurgen Altmann
Science and Global Security, Vol. 9, pp. 165-234 Taylor and Francis, 2001
The Body Electric
Robert Becker, Gary Selden
Harper Paperbacks; 1st Quill edition (August 5, 1998)
Bradford Non-Lethal Weapons Research Project
46

Research Report #8
Neil Davison, Nick Lewer, March 2006 http://www.brad.ac.uk/acad/nlw/
Controlling the Human Mind Nick Begich
Earthpulse Press, 2006
Human Network Attacks
Timothy L. Thomas
Military Review, September-October 1999
Foreign Military Studies Office, Fort Leavenworth, KS.
Epidemiologic data on American personnel in the Moscow Embassy Pollack H.
Bull N Y Acad Med.
1979 Dec;55(11):1182-6.
High Power Microwaves: Strategic and Operational Implications for Warfare
Eileen M. Walling, Col, USAF, Feb 2000, Occasional Paper NO 11
Center for Strategy and Technology, Air War College, Air University, Maxwell AFB, AL
Hypno Politics and Hyper State Control Law Entrainment and the Symbolic Order Konrad Becker, May 1997
Introducing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and its Property of Causal Inference in Investigation Brain-Function Relationships
Dennis J. L. G. Schutter, Jack Van Honk and Jaak Panksepp
Journal of Cognitive Liberties
Center for Cognitive Liberties and Ethics
The Mind Has No Firewall” Parameters, spring 1998, pp. 84-92. Timothy L. Thomas
The Politics and Costs of Postmodern War in the Age of Bush II
Douglas Kellner, UCLA http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/essays/politicscostspostmodernwar.pdf
“Quiet Transformation: The Role of the Office of Net Assessment” The National Security Strategy Process, May 2, 2003
National Defense University
National War College, CDR Debra O’Maddrell
47

Therapeutic Application of repetitive Tran cranial magnetic stimulation: A Review Eric M. Wasserman and Sarah H. Lasanby
Elsevier, April 27, 2001
Magnetic Stimulation: An Introduction” by Grant Balfour
v1.0 – May 6, 2002
A Validation Methodology for Human Behavior Representation Models Authors: Simon R. Goerger; Michael L. McGinnis; Rudolph P. Darken Military Academy West Point, NY, Dept. of System Engineering
by Robert J. Bunker
48

CANR Nonconsensual (/)
Experimentation Abuses (/) DEW’s Today (/dews-today.html) Feinstein Ltr (/feinstein-ltr.html)
(https(:h//twtpws(:hw//t.wtgpwi:v//weDf.ogorinvwaeatferod:r.wcaowrmwd/.fpcuoanmydp/rf
A. Waxman Ltr Sent (/a-waxman-ltr-sent.html)
Wyden Letter 2/11/13 (/wyden-letter-21113.html)
more…
To continue this very important, vital work, we need your help. Please donate to:
Citizens Against Nonconsensual Research CANR
Nationwide Organization
Our issues:
non-consensual experimentation, legal compliance “list” placement and DEW development transparency
https://www.giveforward.com/fundraiser/sbm2/canr-s-mkultra-survivor-fund (https://www.giveforward.com/fundraiser/sbm2/canr-s-mkultra- survivor-fund)
February 11, 2013
Sent via U.S. postal mail and email
Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon Washington, D.C. Office
221 Dirksen Senate Office Bldg. Washington, D.C., 20510
tel (202) 224-5244 fax (202) 228-2717
Re: “Citizen Kill Lists” and Human Rights Activists
CANR supports: “. . .to address the Intelligence Community’s reliance on secret interpretations of surveillance law, arguing that while “intelligence agencies need to be
able to conduct operations in secret, even secret operations need to be conducted within the bounds of established, publicly understood law.. . .” 1.
Dear Senator Wyden:
Our organization, CANR, Citizens Against Nonconsensual Research, supports your position on this very important national issue. We ask that you look into a closely related matter, the issue of non-consensual experimentation. As a member of the Select Committee on Intelligence, and as one who defies, “ the national security community’s abuse of secrecy”, 2. we seek your counsel, with these problems. We feel you are uniquely qualified to speak with us, give us direction and work towards a solution. We ask that you or your staff member respond to us, at your earliest possible convenience.
Our primary issue is non-consensual experimentation, including directed energy weapon testing, on unwitting citizens. A secondary issue is the “citizen kill list”. By the very nature of our issues and claims, many members believe they may have been placed on a FISA, Patriot, and/or, in the future, a secret “citizen kill” list.
We are presenting here, expert signal evidence reports, witnessing unauthorized human experimentation, using directed energy transmitters. We include specific testimony, and clear infrared photography. This problem is nationwide. We believe it involves at least 2,000 citizens. This group is composed of everyday citizens, professional people, whistleblowers, and earlier experimentation survivors.
There is apparent involvement of the intelligence/military, in a covert capacity, directing these actions. We believe this may involve activities of known mil/intel existing, contracting agencies, such as Blackwater (now Ze), Haliburton and others. The wrongdoings — illegal and harmful acts, include this experimentation, harassment, as well as attempts to discredit the complaining victim or whistle blowing parties.
The nature of this experimentation and the parties involved, lead many members to believe they may have been, without cause, placed on a surveillance list: FISA, Patriot, or a Citizen Kill list. We believe that this list placement, acts as color of law, to do this experimentation.
We find your position on the “kill” list to be humane, democratic, and lawful. When any governmental branch steps beyond lawful boundaries, or isn’t forthcoming with “secret” laws, senate investigation and oversight is vital. America is not and by democratic intention, never will be — totalitarian. Your intervention on this matter, ensures
au
this. We believe your statement: “Every American has the right to know when their government believes it is allowed to kill them” is central to this issue.
We are asking for your advice, guidance and support. No CANR member has any affiliation with any terrorist groups. Our members are everyday American citizens. We are presenting our issues and beliefs, in our letter to you and again, seek your advice, guidance and help.
Directed Energy Weapons/Devices
We will provide a brief referenced overview of directed energy weapons and the problems theses unsought “tests” present. EM energy is defined as the frequencies on the electromagnetic spectrum, microwaves, the infrared frequencies, radio waves, extremely low frequency (elf) and others. All EM energies are radiation.
Many everyday devices use EM transmissions to work. Our ipads, ipods, and cell phones use this technology, along with EM frequencies, microwaves, to transmit voices across the continent. WiFi’s and other computers transmit via EM and radio frequencies. The space shuttle speaks to workers in the control room, via EM transmissions, from miles above the earth.
As electromagnetic device development occurred, in the scientific and medical communities, unfortunately many ethical and human rights violations also occurred. The early years of development, were also the years of the Manhattan Project. The U.S. radiation experiments (1950 – 86) are one telling example of the how the rush to scientific development, in this field, resulted in unethical human experimentation.
In her book, The Plutonium Files, Eileen Welsom chronicles the unlawful experimentation many Americans experienced at the hands of doctors and scientists they trusted. It was only years later, that the true nature of these harmful experiments were exposed.
These were years of mushrooming experimentation, (1932 – 1986 ?) which seemed to encourage noncompliance with informed consent. Consequences of overlooking these inherent human rights, became the plight of victims of these non-consensual experiments. Victims endure physical and psychological harms as well as difficulties getting these problems appropriately addressed. We need to move forward, as a nation that honors ethics, and Constitutional guarantees, for all of its citizens. Admitting past (and possibly present) noncompliance, helps us do this.
The Church Senate Subcommittee hearings in 1974, helped to reveal that the U.S. was conducting nonconsensual experimentation: the MKUltra experiments, on American children and unwitting Americans. Some of the defined goals of this experimentation were:
a. To research techniques to impose control over the will of an individual, including neuron surgery, electric shock and drugs and hypnosis;
b. To design and test septal electrodes that would enable Defendants directly to control human behavior; 1.
Descriptions of the MKUltra/DuPlessis Orphanage experiments in Canada, were more explicit, concerning this testing:
“Catholic psychiatric hospitals carried out tests including electric shocks, injections of such drugs as chlorpromazine and LSD, chemical sterilization, and lobotomies. The top secret mind-control Project MKULTRA, pioneered by CIA head Allen Welsh Dulles, was carried out at Montreal’s Allan Memorial Hospital on the orphans.
Many children died from the experimentation. Sylvio Albert Day, who was orphaned at birth and sent to work at hard labor outdoors as a teenager, was conscripted to do the ghastliest work inside St. Jean de Dieu hospital—transporting the bodies of the dead experimentation victims. Decades later, he testified about the surreal life in the Catholic psychiatric hospitals. He described one three-month period when he transported the bodies of 67 dead orphans—boys and girls, young men and women, some as young as five—from operating and electric shock rooms to the basement. He washed the bodies in preparation for sale to the University of Montreal and McGill University, where body parts were removed. (From: http://keepkelb.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/ami011_canada1-l1.pdf (http://keepkelb.files.wordpress.com/2011/03 /ami011_canada1-l1.pdf)
During the Church Senate Subcommittee Hearings these experiments were found to be unethical and illegal. The CIA and the military were directed to find unwitting citizens who had been experimented on and notify them of these tests in 1976. To date, it would seem that this has not happened. 2
Our group is formed to specifically deal with current and past abuses, and nonconsensual testing, of directed energy weapons, and other testing, by the military/intelligence community and third party contractors, engaged. We also address the issue of “surveillance lists”. Many members may be on one, due to their activism on this very issue.
Concerning the non-consensual experimentation: the transmission of EM energy from one point to another is silent and unseen. Using miniaturized portable devices, it is possible to test and harass a human subject in one apartment from another, in one room from another, in one building from another. Even though it is illegal, it is very hard to prove that a transmission of microwaves or EM signals, is occurring.
Some EM devices can cause human muscles to spasm, and vibrate, and it can cause nerve pain. This targeting, with bioelectric weapons, can occur in the individual’s home, workplace or on the street. These weapons, such as one that “tentanizes muscles” 3. as one might be walking into a store to shop, transmit silent unseen, electromagnetic energy, for a specific purpose (often some sort of targeted experimentation or harassment).
As you can well imagine, those of us subjected to this testing/harassment are suffering and experience pain and medical reactions. Many medical symptoms can be directly linked to overexposure to EM activity. Many require medical help due to the long-term effects of exposures to non-ionizing radiation. Intervention is imperative.
High levels of microwave transmitted to the head can cause a ringing or buzzing sound to occur. Long term exposures, to these devices can cause very painful migraine headaches,
kidney problems, cancer, changes at the cellular level (DNA “breaks” and problems with RNA performance), and other pathologies.
Military intelligence development of these devices, as weapons, has produced the taser, acoustic heterodyne, active denial system and other EM based weaponry. These weapons and devices, continue in their development. Our ipads, ipods and Blackberries combine the capabilities of computer databases and cellular telephones. These devices/weapons are losing their mystery. In 2012, many understand how their ipad operates by EM frequencies (no wires, no electrical connection necessary, as the DEWs we speak of. These complaints have merit and are understandable.
The U.S. military spoke of “shock and awe” in its Iraqi military action. They refer to a device called the “Voice of God” to frighten Iraqi ground troops. This is a microwave audio (form of EM) transmission device. These are the types of directed energy (EM, MW) weapons our group complains of being exposed to, in seemingly mil/intel non-consensual experimentation.
We are enclosing and attaching infrared photographs of DEW transmissions from Judith Stringfield, a member in Hamburg, New York. (Judi has recently moved to New York from Tennessee.) She suffers from, and is victimized daily by these exposures. Judi served her country for over eleven years, as a member of the Air Force and has since worked in the private sector. Her resume is attached. (Please see Attachment 1: Photo’s and Resume, Judith Stringfield).
We also enclose and attach letters from William Bradford Taylor, (CT) private detective, hired by James Walbert, a victim, living in Kansas. This correspondence speaks of the detection and tracing of harmful microwave frequencies, James was experiencing, directed at him and his body. The letter finds the source of these harmful

frequencies coming from a nearby apartment. This seems to be mostly the case in these instances, and the party involved, often when regarded, can be found to have ties
(often indirectly) to either the intelligence agencies, the military, or a third party contractor through some conduit.
James is also in contact with Missouri Representative James O. Guest, who makes a strong appeal for all victims of these abuses. (Please see Attachment 2: James Walbert, Letters from James O. Guest, Letters from William B. Taylor and Restraining Order.)
The City Sun Newspaper in Brooklyn, New York published an article concerning victim Brian Wronge’s experiences. It details his unconsented chip implantation, describing this as “medical experimentation.” (Please see Attachment 3: Brian Wronge, New York unconsented implant victim.)
Nonconsensual Human Subject Testing, Unethical, Violates American Law
The nonconsensual testing, many citizens are experiencing is wrong. It is morally wrong. It is also a violation of national and international law. Our very strong intentions are to get this stopped. Citizens must be notified of involvement in earlier, secret, CIA tests. Later human subjects, must also be notified by testing agencies of the military/intelligence. Our FOIA’s concerning list placement must be answered.
We seek effective action towards these goals.
We are working to get this stopped. We ask that you support our goals and speak with us to help our concentrated efforts to stop these violations of the human being, spirit and body. If the development of these devices does not proceed along ethical lines, and in accord with international law (developed upon exposure of outrageous abuses in Nazi Germany), human rights, as we now understand and enjoy them, are severely jeopardized.
The ethical consideration, “what kind of a world are we making and leaving for our children?” presents a very vital, real question in this situation. The very sustainability of civilization itself, is threatened by this continued unauthorized human subject testing and EM weapon development, in this manner. Current national and international laws need to be observed. Left unchecked, this problem may certainly involve our children, grandchildren and other innocent, unwitting and possibly, vulnerable populations. This needs to be stopped, now.
The Wilson Directive, the Nuremberg Code, 45 C.F.R. 46 (the Common Rule) and other laws, (including Executive Orders) and accepted norms of practice need to be adhered to. These activities need to be stopped, in accord with these rules, laws and international laws. We also would like full disclosure as to any “list” placement concerning our members and the methods necessary to be taken “off “ these lists.
We ask that you speak with us, concerning this situation and read the literature, we provide and take our complaints and concerns, very seriously. Thank you for your kind attention to our concerns.
Sincerely,
Lynn Bowne Weed,
Paralegal, Co-Director, CANR
lynnandmarie@live.com (mailto:lynnandmarie@live.com)
(347) 478 9582
Judith Stringfield, Co-Director, CANR Jstringfield125@gmail.com (mailto:Jstringfield125@gmail.com)
(716) 390 3651
Website:
http://www.CANRnonconsensual.weebly.com (http://www.CANRnonconsensual.weebly.com)
Please see Signatory Page.
Signatures, by “e” signature, verbal agreement and proxy. Representing 43 Nationwide and by association, 200
Note: 1. From:
2. From: http://www.wyden.senate.gov/meet-ron/biography (http://www.wyden.senate.gov/meet-ron/biography)
cc: Quaker Peace Mission, United Nations
Benjamin Chaney, President, James Earl Chaney, Jr. Organization, Inc.
_____________________________________________
Attachments Reference 1:
Photo’s and Resume, Judith Stringfield, Hamburg, New York (Recently moved from Tennessee. Photo’s are of Judi when she was living in her home in TN, 2009.)
She continues to experience these Directed Energy Weapon/Device exposures. Ms. Stringfield’s photographs of these abuses are available on the hard copy of this document which we mailed with the original of this letter and which was received by your Washington D.C. office on September 15, 2012. She prefers that they not be transmitted via email transmission.
http://www.wyden.senate.gov/priorities/secret-law (http://www.wyden.senate.gov/priorities/secret-law)
A brief description of one photo : Ms. Stringfield is standing outside of her house in Tennessee and the beam of light with a large ball of light is penetrating her head.
These are silent unseen transmissions. They can be captured using an expensive infrared camera, which will pick up this “light”.
Reference 2:
James Walbert, Kansas: Letters from Representative James O. Guest, Letters from P.I. William Bradford Taylor and Restraining Order granted by a Kansas Judge on Behalf of James Walbert Letters.
08DM864 COPY
The Great Seal of the State of Missouri JAMES O. GUEST
STATE REPRESENTATIVE
DISTRICT ADDRESS
P.O. Box 412
King City, MO 64463
Tele: 660-535-6664
To Whom It May Concern:
I have worked for 3 years with Microwave and Electronic Harassment victims throughout the U.S. and overseas. It is hard for others to understand the technology that is being used to destroy people’s lives. I know James because he contacted me for help. James has worked to find proof of what has happened to him.
Many victims try hard to get help from professional doctors to help find devices such as Veri-Chip. I would request that you and those that can make a difference would help James and others to find answers.
/s/
Jim Guest
5th District State Representative cc: re-entered text from original.
The William J. Taylor Agency Investigations CT State License
FL State License
Investigations
Security Counseling November 21, 2008
To whom it may concern,
The undersigned is a licensed Private Investigator, licensed in the state of Florida and the state of Connecticut. The undersigned is not an expert in electronics nor an electrical engineer certified to conduct these issues. The undersigned has however been successfully locating and identifying electronic devices that are designed to eavesdrop in individuals and harass for numerous known and unknown reasons for over forty years. References are available on request.
On or about 1500 on January 6, 2008, the undersigned met with and interviewed Mr. James Walbert of Wichita, Kansas. Mr. Walbert related to the undersigned that he believed he had been subjected to various forms of electronic surveillance and electronic harassment by persons known or unknown to him, for reasons known or unknown to him. (I shall not violate Mr. Walbert’s confidence by memorializing his suspicions in this report as Mr. Walbert is involved in a legal matter relating to this harassment.)
During the course of the afternoon of the 6th of January 2008, the undersigned tested Mr. Walbert’s person for radiation using a JM-20PRO, 1MHz – 3GHz. Portable R.F. Detector and a JM-20F RF Finder Bar Graph Display RF Frequency Detector.
The undersigned found that the JM-20PRO detected a low signal coming from Mr. Walbert’s right upper back area of his person. Upon scanning Mr. Walbert with the JM-20F the undersigned found a low bandwidth signal of a fairly steady 288MHz. (A background signal of the area was 800 to 900 MHz.)
It is also worthy of mention that while viewing Mr. Walbert through a Bushnell 26 4202G Night Vision Infrared Viewer there was a very definite visual distortion of light on Mr. Walbert’s back area.
These tests and results were witnessed by a credible third party with the permission of Mr. Walbert. Respectfully,
William Johnstone Taylor, LPI Post Office Box 878
DeLand, FL 43721-0878 Phone (386) 738-2233
Fax (386) 822-9876 ___________________________________________________
James’ Walbert’s Restraining Order
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SEDGWICK COUNTY, Kansas Filed Dec. 30, 2008
Clerk of District Court 18th Judicial District

Sedgewick County
COPY
05 DM 8647
FINAL ORDER – PROTECTION FROM STALKING
James Walbert, Plaintiff, v. Jerimiah Redford, Defendant .. .
THIS FINAL ORDER SHALL EXPIRE AT MIDNIGHT ON Wednesday, December 30, 2009
UNLESS EXTENDED OR MODIFIED BY THIS COURT
On this date, Tuesday, December 30, 2008 , plaintiff’s petition for protective orders comes for consideration under the provisions of K.S.A. 60-31a01, et seq.
.. .
WHEREAS, the plaintiff filed a verified petition for issuance of protective orders, and the cause has been heard after duly serving and notifying the defendant and the plaintiff has proved the allegations of the abuse by the preponderance of the evidence;. . . WHEREUPON the Court adopts the agreement of the parties as to the order of Court as set forth below:
IT IS THEREFORE BY THE COURT ORDERED:
1. This final order of protection supersedes any temporary order previously entered by the Court and serves as notice of termination thereof.
2. The defendant shall not follow, harass, telephone, contact or otherwise communicate with victim.
3. The defendant shall not abuse, molest, or interfere with the privacy rights of the victim, wherever the victim might be.
4. The defendant shall not enter upon or in the victim’s residence or the immediate vicinity thereof.
5. Defendant shall pay costs.
(End of Document)
_______________________________________________________ To the courts of Sedgwick County Kansas:
I, James Walbert am filing with the courts of Sedgwick County of Kansas. For a protection from Stalking under these request’s.
That any and all parties that related Jeremiah Redford of 2614 N. Wedgewood be restrained from using these listed devices for stalking harassment and or bodily harm, eavesdropping, electronic forms of harassment and stalking. As I have retained an attorney for this matter and an investigator that has provided reading that are indicative to these weapons and or devices that are currently being used to perform the above achievements as they are intended to propagate the said things to the human body and the human nervous system of electromagnetic or said forms of as listed in the attached document that are provided to the courts. That these devices be withheld from being used upon my person or other persons that are related to myself and my family. The documentation that is attached to this protection from stalking clearly provides the courts the means and the ways for this type of harassment and stalking.
This request is per James Walbert
Of this said address of Withita KS 3607 west 13th st apt B-0 Wichita ks 67209
Respectfully James Walbert
Reference 3:
Brian Wronge, New York Unconsented Implant Victim. )
The City Sun
Dec. 15 – Dec. 21, 1993Vol. 11, No. 49 New York City Metropolitan Weekly (Brooklyn, NY)
CHARGE OF HOLOCAUST
MEDICAL EXPERIMENT ON BLACK INMATE SEE PAGE 4
HORRIFIC EXPERIMENT OR ROUTINE IMPLANTATION?
Brooklyn resident Brian Wronge claims and X-rays verify, that paramagnetic computers were implanted in his head and body – without his knowledge or consent – while he was imprisoned in August of 1987. Despite the inhumane violation, this technology which made him a victim; he’s fearless and outraged. In Maitefa Angaza’s City Sun exclusive, the government secret is exposed, proving that this time they messed with the Wronge guy.
The article was printed in the Dec. 15 to Dec. 21, 1993 issue.
Sci-Fact – Not fiction: High-Tech Slavery Is Here
By Maitefa Angaza
It reads like a futuristic horror story: “Invasion of the brain snatchers”, “Blackman vs. mad scientist is battle for the last frontier – own inner space.
The reality is a present day horror story in which some medical professionals feel sub-human violation is acceptable and basic human rights are negligible.
Brian Wronge, a 33 year –old black Brooklyn resident, originally from Guyana claims that surgeons at Bailey Seaton Hospital on Staten Island, New York, illegally, and without his knowledge, implanted paramagnetic computer chips in his head and body in October.
He has filed a suit in the Eastern District Federal Court, charging the U.S. government with conspiracy to commit murder and invasion of privacy for including him in what is considered to be an experimental surveillance and behavioral study program victimizing inmates and possibly, other members of the population.

Wronge’s story starts in 1979, when he was arrested in connection with the armed robbery of a disco in Brooklyn, a crime he claims he did not commit. “Some people I
was known to be affiliated with from the neighborhood were arrested and charged connection with him, he said.
“A few days later, I heard the police were looking for me, so I went down to the Precinct on my own to find out what they wanted.” He was put into a lineup, arrested and agreed to a plea-bargain for 1 1/3 to 3 1/3 years and convicted. “Being that I had nothing to with the crime, I refused. And at the time I was 2 1⁄2 years into a five-year probation for another robbery which I admitted I had done when I was 18 years old.”
Wronge maintained his innocence and was convicted of armed robbery and assault and was sentenced to 7 1⁄2 to 15 years in prison. He was sent to Elmira Correction Facility and remained there for four years, during which time he obtained an associates degree from Corning Community College’s Behind the Walls Program.
It was at Elmira that his scientific aptitude was noticed. “In my first semester I wrote a paper for Professor Aronson’s Psych 101 class illustrating how the human senses can be imitated using computer analog devices,” Wronge recalled. “I received the highest grade on my paper. I let a few correction officers read it. The next thing you know, I’m having problems at the facility.” I was already transferred to Arthur Kill Correctional Facility when I had let an officer read my paper. I stayed at this facility for three years. . . .
A chest X-ray was done and the results were negative, with no indication of lung problems.”
But, Wronge claims, Dr. Vincent Tarantola of the pulmonary clinic at Bailey Seaton Hospital convinced him of the need for a bronchoscopy, a diagnostic procedure used to detect problems in the lungs. . . .
Following the hospital incident, it quickly became apparent to Wronge that something was terribly amiss. He experienced a host of physical disturbances, including dizziness, nausea incontinence and headaches, along with an inability to sleep. He was suspicious that his body had been tampered with. . . .
Wronge said he began to suspect that whatever had been done to him was for the purpose of experimentation and observation. . . .
The Search Begins
. . . He went to see Dr. Albert O. Duncan, a physician acquainted with his brother, who wrote him a prescription for MRI – a type of X-ray.
Diagnostic Imaging Associates a Brooklyn lab, responded back: “MRI of the chest was performed. These images reveal the presence of a paramagnetic foreign body
artifact noted in the region of the left anterior chest wall at the level of the axilla.”
(Emphasis, CANR Editors)
Wrong also consulted a neurologist who had worked with his mother, Dr. Jayesh Kamdar. After relating his story, Kamdar referred him to a Manhattan diagnostic lab for a CAT scan.
The resulting report from MRI-
CT Scanning Inc. revealed: “The bilateral external auditory canals demonstrate dense rectangular shaped metal foreign objects. The etiology of this finding is uncertain. Clinical correlation is suggested.”
.. .
(Entire article is in the hard copy mailed to the Senator’s Washington, D.C. office.)
Reference 4.
26 July 1963 Memorandum For: Director of Central Intelligence, Subject Report of Inspection of MKUltra ” Scope of the MKUltra Charter
. . . Many additional avenues to the control of human behavior have been designated by the TSD management as appropriate to investigation under the MKUltra Charter including radiation, electro-shock, various fields of psychology, psychiatry, sociology and anthropology, graphology, harassment substance and paramilitary devices and materials.”
Reference 5:
Vietnam Veterans of America et al. v. CIA et al. CV 09-0037-CW,U.S.D.C. (N.D. Cal 2009), Second Amended Order for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief Under U.S. Constitution and Federal Statutes (Class Action), pp 8,9 # 13,14,15,16. To wit:
#15. DEFENDANTS’ promise in the 1970s to locate the victims of their human
experimentation program, and to provide compensation and health care, proved to be hollow. DEFENDANTS never made a sincere effort to locate the survivors. . . .
Reference 6:
U.S. Patent 5675103
Inventors: Herr; Jan Eric (San Diego, CA) Filed: February 8, 1996
Abstract:
A Weapon for temporarily immobilizing a target subject by means of muscular tetanization in which the tetanization is produced by conducting a precisely-
modulated electrical current through the target. Because the electrical current is a close replication of the physiological neuroelectric impulses which control striated muscle tissue, it tetanizes the subject’s skeletal muscles without causing any perceptible sensation. One source: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Pacer (http://patft.uspto.gov /netacgi/nph-Pacer)
Reference 7:
Patents
U.S. Patent No. 4877027 http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=4877027.PN.& OS=PN/4877027&RS=PN/4877027 (http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&

r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=4877027.PN.&OS=PN/4877027&RS=PN/4877027)
U.S. Patent No. 3773049 (The Lida)
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=3773049.PN.& OS=PN/3773049&RS=PN/3773049 (http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm& r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=3773049.PN.&OS=PN/3773049&RS=PN/3773049)
U.S. Patent No. 6011991 Mardirossian
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6011991.PN.& OS=PN/6011991&RS=PN/6011991 (http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm& r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6011991.PN.&OS=PN/6011991&RS=PN/6011991)
U.S. Patent No. 5159703 (Silent Sound)
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5159703.PN.& OS=PN/5159703&RS=PN/5159703 (http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm& r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5159703.PN.&OS=PN/5159703&RS=PN/5159703)
1995, US Department of Defense’s contract, “Communicating via the Microwave Auditory Effect; Awarding Agency: Department of Deafens; SBIR Contract Number: F41624-95-C-9007”.
Description: a means of low-probability-of-intercept Radio Frequency (RF) communications. Concept, established using both a low intensity laboratory system and a high power RF transmitter
[http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/BraveNewWorld.html] Hypersonic Sound System, Audio Spotlight both, DEW‘s.
Disclaimer: Our advocacy is directly for issues and events stated, defined and described, on our website and individual web pages. Those are our sole advocacy. Claims, concerning other events, beliefs, stated offenses and events, and parties responsible, concerning our claims are not those of Kelb and we do not advocate for, nor support them. We advocate solely and exclusively for what we state on our site and webpages. Internet connections to our site do not represent our organizational work, concerns and issues.
Signatory Page
Judith Stringfield, Co-Director, CANR Social Worker, New York
Beverly Schweitzer, RN, AZ
David Beauchamp, V. Pres. CANR, Public Television Producer (Ch. 13), Media Production, NYC
Ken Rhoades, Former Small Business Executive, Michigan
James Walbert, Inventor, Kansas Rights Activist, (NGO’s, U.N.) Phila, PA Harlan Girard, Director, ICAOM, Phila, PA
Human Rights Writer, Activist
Nancy Miller, NC, RN Human Rights Activist
Steven De Leno, NY, NY
Georgia Stewart, TX, CA
Joan Salinger, Digital Photography Prof.
Orange County, California
Gail Whittaker (deceased) Former Fox, Newswriter Cin, IL, CA
Brian Wronge, Brooklyn, New York
Rosemary Johnson, Lancaster, PA
Michael A. Shaneyfelt, Ind. Mgr., Alabama
Beth Donohue, Computer Engineer, FL
Janis Lanham, Soc. Worker, Women and Human Rights, NC
Lynn Bahrenberg, VT
Ken Lee, Author, SC
Carl Speer, Washington
Ann Baker, IL
Christopher Brunson, Hum. Rts. Act. NC, NY
Daniel Moore, MD
Denise Pompl, Qns, NY
Ernest Taylor, Pharmaceutical Sales,, NJ
Tom McClellan, Music Therapist, NYC
Mark Oppenheim, Real Estate, NYC
Ron Hawke, NJ, Human Rights Activist
Kathy Platter, GA
Eldon Byrd, (deceased) Il
Charles Schultz (deceased 2010), IL
Cindy Goldman (deceased ‚12) Washington State
Small Business Owner
Siegfried Bailey, NY
Erica Gilmore, CA
Jeffrey Murray, IL
Lynn Troxel, SW, TX
Lucy Geraets, Data Base Spec., CA
Jennifer Berkenmeir

_SOURCE=INTERNAL&UTM_MEDIUM=FOOTER&UTM_CAMPAIGN=3)
UTM
Home Products Rental options Shop by brand Contact Programming & Monitoring Home Security Equipment Mosquito Anti-loitering Devices
Head Office
CSS Ltd,
10 Criccieth Grove, Merthyr Tydfil, South Wales,
CF48 1JY
After Sales
Contact us via online form 01685 350418
Delivery Information Returns Information
Sitemap
> Products & Services > Privacy Policy
> About CSS
> CSS News
> Info Centre
© 2015 Compound Security Systems Ltd | CSS Ltd,10 Criccieth Grove,Merthyr Tydfil,South Wales,CF48 1JY | +44 (0)1685 350418 | Register
GPRS Or GS
M Explain
ed (UK) No. 05
e
So, you’re having problems with kids and teens?
Every day we receive calls from people wanting to buy a Mosquito Anti-loitering Devi like you who are fed up with groups of kids damaging their property, hanging around in r groups, smoking and drinking, playing music and generally preventing you from enjoyin or business.
You have tried talking to them. You have tried talking to their parents if you know them. P have even wasted your time getting the police involved. Now you need to take matters in own hands in a way that does not involve any confrontation.
You as an individual have a legal right to peaceful enjoyment of your property or business Mosquito Anti-Loitering Device is the most effective and benign way of getting rid of the
The Mosquito device is the only product on the market that has the teeth to bite back at t The Mosquito alarm works not by being loud and painful, but by being UNBELIEVABLY an the point where the kids CANNOT stay in the area being covered by the mosquito sound
The Mosquito device is 100% legal to own and use and requires no planning permissions simple to install (just bolt to a wall or post) and simply plugs in to a standard 13A wall soc want to know more about the Mosquito before purchasing, see our Mosquito informat
If you want to reclaim your right to a peaceful existence, buy your Mosquito Anti-Loitering now!
“The impact it has made to our lives has been unbelievable”
Kris Perkins, private home-owner, UK

ce
owdy
g your ho
erhaps yo to your
and The problem.
hese kids. noying to
.
etc. It is ket. If you
ion page
Device
m u
Mosquito MK4 (Anti-Loitering device) Customise your own kit
The most effective tool for dispersing groups of misbehaving teenagers. Safe & legal. No licenses or permissions required
£594.00 Enquire for trade pricing
Mosquito Kit 1 – MK4 + PSU EU (A Loitering device)
The most effective tool for dispersing misbehaving teenagers. Safe & legal. or permissions required
£598.80

Enquire for tr
nti-
groups of No licens
ade pricin
e
MosquitoKit2-MK4+Cage+PSUEU(Anti- Loitering device)
The most effective tool for dispersing groups of misbehaving teenagers. Safe & legal. No licenses or permissions required
£646.80 Enquire for trade pricing
MosquitoKit2-MK4+Cage+PS Loitering device)
The most effective tool for dispersing misbehaving teenagers. Safe & legal. or permissions required
£646.80
Mosquito Kit 1 – MK4 + PSU UK (Anti- Loitering device)
The most effective tool for dispersing groups of misbehaving teenagers. Safe & legal. No licenses or permissions required
£598.80
Enquire for trade pricing
Enquire for tr
UUK(An
groups of No licens
ade pricin
e
Emerging Technology From the arXiv March 1, 2012
How to Build a Speech-Jamming Gun
Japanese researchers build a gun capable of stopping speakers in mid-sentence.
The drone of speakers who won’t stop is an inevitable experience at conferences, meetings, cinemas, and public libraries.
Today, Kazutaka Kurihara at the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology in Tskuba and Koji Tsukada at Ochanomizu University, both in Japan, present a radical solution: a speech- jamming device that forces recalcitrant speakers into submission.
The idea is simple. Psychologists have known for some years that it is almost impossible to speak when your words are replayed to you with a delay of a fraction of a second.
Kurihara and Tsukada have simply built a handheld device consisting of a microphone and a speaker that does just that: it records a person’s voice and replays it to them with a delay of about 0.2 seconds. The microphone and speaker are directional, so the device can be aimed at a speaker from a distance, like a gun.
In tests, Kurihara and Tsukada say their speech-jamming gun works well: “The system can disturb remote people’s speech without any physical discomfort.”
Their tests also identify some curious phenomena. They say the gun is more effective when the delay varies in time and more effective against speech that involves reading aloud than against spontaneous
monologue. Sadly, they report that it has no effect on meaningless sound sequences such as “aaaaarghhh.”
Kurihara and Tsukada make no claims about the commercial potential of their device but list various applications. They say it could be used to maintain silence in public libraries and to “facilitate discussion” in group meetings. “We have to establish and obey rules for proper turn-taking when speaking,” they say.
That has important implications. “There are still many cases in which the negative aspects of speech become a barrier to the peaceful resolution of conflicts, ” they point out.
Clearly, speech jamming has a significant future role in contributing to world peace and should obviously be installed at the United Nations with immediate effect.
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1202.6106: SpeechJammer: A System Utilizing Artificial Speech Disturbance with Delayed Auditory Feedback
Tagged: Communications
Reprints and Permissions | Send feedback to the editor
MIT Technology Review © 2015 v1.13.05.10

Secret Surveillance and
Electromagnetic Torture by the Secret Services
Translation by Cyborg Nicholson on Peacepink
LINK TO ORIGINAL ARTICLE FROM THE GERMAN PRESS:
http://media.de.indymedia.org/media/2010/04//278517.pdf
The story told by Carl Clark will partially take your breath away. The Englishman describes how he targeted people and then became a target himself after he’d opted out. He also took part in the deployment of microwave weapons in order to torture others, after which they were later turned on him. “These criminal shenanigans need to be exposed in public so that they can be stopped.” He describes below why he blew the whistle.
Interview with Carl Clark, Norfolk, England.
Armin Gross: Matters related to the secret services are usually not disclosed. You want to bring
them out in the open though. Who did you work for?
Carl Clark: I worked freelance from 1980 to 2003 for various secret services. I worked for the American Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) up to 1997. I then worked for the Israeli Secret Services, Mossad and for the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a US organisation against discrimination and defamation of Jews. I was also employed by MI 5, a subgroup of the British Secret Services. I later moved to the Police Secret Services as well as to the secret services of an investigation laboratory. I was deployed in European operations in Paris, Zurich, Berlin, Dusseldorf, Munich, Madrid, Lyon, Bilbao and Moscow.
Armin Gross: What were your main assignments?
Carl Clark: An important assignment was to infiltrate certain groups to obtain inside information about them. I would join certain groups, make friends with some of the members and then proceed to ruin their lives.
Armin Gross: What kind of groups were they?
Carl Clark: First and foremost criminal gangs and drug cartels. I provided information about the National Front, Nazis or skinheads to Israeli Secret Services. What they were interested in

were names, addresses, meeting places, projects and objectives. I tracked individual targets for the CIA.
Armin Gross: What exactly did you do?
Carl Clark: I spied on people for long periods, eavesdropped on their conversations. I also had orders to confuse or deceive them. I would therefore secretly force my way into their homes, remove some things and just move others around. I would then delete data from their computer. Or I would just drive them crazy, by following them and turning up close by either in the railway station or the bus station, etc. Otherwise, I would stage a fight in the street right in full view of the target’s eyes, and many other ploys. If our orders were to put somebody under more pressure or even arrest them, I would install certain material on their computers such as child pornography, instructions to manufacture a bomb, etc.
Armin Gross: What type of individuals were you instructed to target?
Carl Clark: People who were politically relevant. Likewise, people who opposed or acted against the interests of large companies such as the pharmaceuticals. Some belonged to criminal gangs, but there were two or three targets that had nothing on them at all as far as I could make out.
Armin Gross: How many individuals did you have under surveillance in total?
Carl Clark: In the 80s it was five or six, in the 90s seven, and from 2000 to 2003, there were three. You can appreciate from the low number of targets how intensive the targeting was. One requires at least six months right at the outset to accumulate as much information as possible about prospective targets’ past lives.
Armin Gross: How did you acquire this information?
Carl Clark: From the garbage can, the telephone, mail, the Internet. That sort of thing has got much easier with recent advances in technology. Bugs are no longer necessary as you can eavesdrop on mobile phones, ISDN phones or small parabolic receiving dishes nowadays. Unfortunately, the deployment of microwave weapons has, in addition, become very practicable.
MICROWAVE WEAPONS
Armin Gross: Did you also use such weapons?
Carl Clark: No. I was responsible for surveillance. Colleagues from special departments did this. However, I was at times on site when these weapons were deployed.
Armin Gross: Can you describe in more detail how the deployment of weapons took place?
Carl Clark: It’s a bit like what takes place in a science fiction movie. People can be tracked anywhere by radar, satellite, a base station and complimentary computer programs. For example, three radar devices would sometimes be positioned in the vicinity of the target. The radar emits electromagnetic waves, some of which pick up the target and the result is then evaluated. My friends who work in the special department could then follow the target all day on their computers. This form of localising the target made it easy to deploy the weapons accurately. My colleagues could see exactly where to aim and also observe how the target reacted.
Armin Gross: What effect did the weapons have on the targets?
Carl Clark: They create heat, inner burns, pain, nausea, fear. Sometimes traces are left on the skin, but mostly not. If the targets go to the doctor, they get told everything is OK. Take into account, this was the situation ten years ago. This technology has advanced considerably since then.
Armin Gross: What is the objective of such attacks?
Carl Clark: The aim is to intimidate certain people, for example people who make a lot of noise. I myself was under attack for three years after opting out. I’m virtually sure that weapons were used against me in 2003/2004 which provoked strong aggression. I almost killed somebody on two occasions, once a neighbour who was a pleasant elderly lady.
ATTEMPTS TO DRIVE PEOPLE TO INSANITY
Armin Gross: Do you think it’s possible to directly influence feelings by weaponising
electromagnetic rays?
Carl Clark: Without doubt. We know that living organism is sensitive to electromagnetic radiation. Elementary life processes within cells function by biogenic electromagnetic oscillation. Frequencies from the exterior can damage or change these processes. There have already been far-reaching attempts at influencing body, mind and soul through frequencies within the framework of military research. It’s possible to provoke fear, aggression, nervousness or forgetfulness in this way. In combination with other interventions, a target can be driven insane. For example, radiofrequency can be manipulated so that the target hears his own name on the radio or his computer shows his name time and again. Voices are also specifically transmitted to a target commenting on his activities. For example, I heard a voice in the morning after getting up which said “Get up and injure somebody.”
Armin Gross: People are actually being driven to psychic extremes then?
Carl Clark: Yes, the undoubted goal is to have select people end up in psychiatric institutions. If a target seeks help by going to the police or to the doctor, they don’t get taken seriously. Some doctors and hospitals actually work together with the Secret Services. Diagnostic directives permit a patient who feels persecuted or hears voices to be classified as schizophrenic.
Armin Gross: Hospitals cooperate with the Secret Services?
Carl Clark: Yes, certainly. Large companies too. That’s why one lives dangerously if one carries out investigations on large companies. The American State protects large companies like MacDonald’s, Coca-Cola and certain pharmaceutical enterprises. These companies also have FBI agents at their disposal for matters related to industrial espionage. The Freemasons who are widespread within the CIA also play a major role
ENORMOUS SURVEILLENCE NET
Armin Gross: Do you know in which countries individuals are under surveillance and are being
assaulted by energy weapons?
Carl Clark: The USA, Germany, China, North Korea, Russia, France and England, normally without the official knowledge of the particular government. But unofficially, I believe that government personnel must be involved in some way or know something about the goings-on.
Armin Gross: Do you know how many people are under surveillance?
Carl Clark: There are about 5,000 in England under surveillance and about 15,000 overseeing the operation. Apart from the large Secret Service agencies, there are 300 or 400 minor Secret Service agencies which were formed by former policemen or former Secret Service agents. They have permission from the Home Office to spy, take photographs and procure information. Their employees are well paid.
Armin Gross: Was it a problem for you to switch from one Secret Service agency to another?
Carl Clark: No. It was always a positive move from my new employer’s viewpoint as I could always provide information to him about my previous Secret Service agency. The large Secret Service agencies mistrust each other totally. I earned more money as a result.
OPTING OUT
Armin Gross: Why did you opt out?
Carl Clark: I saw that what I was doing was wrong. The last two targets that were allocated to me had done nothing. They were not political, quite normal, nice people, not criminal or economically dangerous. The only reason I could come up with for them having been selected as targets was their DNA or their blood. There has recently been a lot of research done in this area. The DNA is associated with the finest details of our character. The Human Genomes Project
between 1993 and 2004 analyzed all chemical base pairs which make up human DNA, also collecting the genetic data of people from isolated communities in danger of extinction (Human Genomes Diversity Project). The results were then all compared and correlated. Our employers were always very keen on DNA analyses of the people under surveillance. It was always one of our most important tasks in the initial period of surveillance to organize DNA or blood analyses of these individuals.
Armin Gross: You’ve already mentioned that opting out in 2003 caused you problems. Can you give a few examples?
Carl Clark: I was once followed by a helicopter through the night as I drove a truck 3,000 miles to deliver packages. As I walked along an alley, I was attacked by a man who struck me a blow. Then on another occasion, somebody removed three connections from my engine on the motorway causing the engine to get dislodged and fall out of its casing. On another occasion as I drove a truck with a three-ton load, two of my tyres suddenly exploded. When the police arrived, they stated they’d never witnessed anything like it. Then there was the time when I was followed over a great distance whilst driving. It made me so angry that I brought my car to an abrupt halt, grabbed my baseball bat and got out of the car. Three cars which were tailing me suddenly took off in reverse gear at great speed. In normal circumstances, they would have reported my behaviour to the police, but these did not. On another occasion, I was sent three people who were supposed to strike up a friendship with me in order to spy on me. As I knew they were listening in on my telephone conversations, I stated loudly on the telephone to somebody that I planned to kill the people who had wormed their way into my life. The three individuals disappeared from the scene altogether after that.
Armin Gross: And what’s the current situation? Do you think you are still being targeted?
Carl Clark: Of course. I have also found out that the secret services wish to know why I flew to
Germany.
Armin Gross: Are you not then living dangerously at present?
Carl Clark: I am prepared to stand up to them. They also know that I know a lot about them, and that I intend to do something about their violations or breaches. I have friends in special units, people in Afghanistan and in Iraq that support me.
Tips for Victims of Surveillance.
Armin Gross: Have you any tips for people who feel they are under surveillance?
Carl Clark: It’s a good idea to avoid the use of certain terminology in emails such as “government” or “mind control,” etc., because digital surveillance seeks out key, sought-after vocabulary. It’s also an idea to check out whether anyone’s forced their way into your home. Intruders often deploy anaesthetic gases sprayed through the letter box on a door for example
before they break in during the night. You’d just wake up in the morning with a metallic taste in your mouth. If cars behave in a strange way, you should take note of the registration numbers. If you receive letters you don’t recognise or expect, they should be wrapped in aluminium foil. There are special measuring devices to detect high frequency rays in the home.
Armin Gross: Do you know of any other whistleblowers who have related stories similar to yours?
Carl Clark: Up to now, no. But I hope that there will be more who are prepared to go public in the future.
It
Heimliche Uberwachung
und Strahlenfolter
durch
Whistleblower outet sich als ehemaliger Täter
Geheimdienste
Bei der Geschichte, die Carl Clark erzählt, bleibt einem terlweise die Luft weg, Der Engländer beschreibt, wie er für verschiedene Geheimdienste
Menschen uberwacht und verfolgt
hat und dann nach seinem Austritt
aus diesen Diensten selbst zum
Opfer wurde. Auch den Einsatz von Mikrowellenwaffen hat er erst beglei- tet, dann selbst zu spuren bekommen.
,,Di e se kriminell e n M achen sch afte n müssen an die )ffentlichkeit, damtt sie gestoppt werden können”, beschreibt er seine Motivatton, sich zu ,,outen”.
lnterview mit Carel Clark, Norfolk, England,
von Armin Groß, Berlin (Name v. d. Red. geändert).
rmin Groß: Gcheindienst Ange.le!,lenheiten sind qc utrilltlitlt Versrhlusssache. Sic alter unllen Licltt itt das l)unl.el brinAetl. Für uten hobcn Sie qedrbcitet? Carl Clark: Ich habe als lreier Mitarbeiter von 1980 l:ris 2003 für v..rschiedene Gcheimdienste gearb€itct. Zuerst
war ich bis 1997 frir dcn amerikalischen Gcheimdicnst, die Ccntral Intelligcnce Agcncy (ClA), tätig. Dann arbeite te ich für dcn israeiischert Ceheimdienst, dcn Mossad und für dic Anti Defamation League (ADL), eine US ameriha nische Organisation Segen DiskriminierLrng und Diffaulie- rung von Judcn. Ich stalrd aLrch im Dienst dcs MI 5, cinc UntergrLlppierung des britischen Gehcilndienstes Später rvcchseite ich zu einen polizeilichen Ceheimdienst uncl auch zu den Geheimdienst cines Forschungslabors. Mein Einsatzgebiet war Europai Paris, Zürich, Berlir, Düssel
dorf, München, Bilbao, Madrid, Lyon und lvloskatl
Umfassender lnformationsdienst
A. G; IMts u)aren Ihre Houptaufqaben?
C. C.: Eine HauptaufSabe \’var es, Gruppen zu ilfiltrie rcn, um so lnfonnationen über sie zu erhalten lch schloss
roum&zeit rcttzaag 47
reum&zeit lnterview
mich also bestimmten Gruppen an, baute Freundschaften mit Mitgliedern auf und hall mit, ihr Leben zu rurnie ren.
mender Technisierung ist es immer ein- facher geworden. Heute brauchen Sie auch keine Wanzen mehr, um abzuhö ren. Man belauscht über Handys, ISDN Telefone oder kleine Parabolantennen. Auch der Einsatz von Mikrowellenwaf fen ist leider sehr leicht umsetzbar ge- worden.
Mikrowellen”Waffen
Carl Clark
A. G: Was aarcn das für Gtuppen?
C. C.: In erster Linie kriminelle Banden
oder Drogenkartelle. Für den israeli
schen Geheimdienst beschaffte ich In-
formationen über die ,,National Front”,
eine rechtsextreme Partei, über Na
zis, Skinheads oder Juden. Interessant
für sie waren Namen, Adressen, Treff-
punkte und Vorhaben. Für die CIA überwachte ich Ein chung zuständig. Es waren Mitarbeiter von Spezialabtei-
zelpersonen.
A. G.: Was mqchten Sie da genau2
C. C.: Ich beobachtete Menschen über einen langen Zeitraum, belauschte ihre Gespräche. Ich hatte auch den Auftrag, diese Leute zu verwiüen. So drang ich heimlich in ihre Häuser ein, nahm dort Dinge weg oder verstellte das eine oder andere. lch löschte Daten auf ihrem Computer Oder ich !,€runsicherte die se Personen, indem ich sie verfolgte, immer wieder in ihrer Nähe auftauchte, an der Bushaltestelle, im Bahnhof, etc. Oder wir fäd€lten einen Kampf auf offen€r Sftaße ein, der sich dann vor den Augen dieser Person abspielte und vieles andere. Wenn jemand noch m€hr unter Druck Sesetzt oder verhaf- tet werden sollte, zog ich auch bestimmte Inhalte auf sei n€n Computer wie zum Beispiel kinderpornografische In- halte, eine Anleitung zur HersteliunS einer Bombe, etc.
A. G.: Was waren das für Einzelpersonen, auf die Sie ange-
C. C.: Leute, die politisch rel€vant waren, Oppositionelle, Leute, die gegen große Firmen agierten, zum Beispiei ge gen Pharmafirmen. Manche gehörten zu kriminellen Banden. Aber bei zwei, dreien konnte ich nicht erkennen, warum sie auch auf dieser Liste standen.
A. G.: I(ie Diele Einzelpeßonen haben Sie insgesamt über wacht7
C. C.: In den 80ern waren es fünf bis sechs, in den 90ern sieben und von 2000 bis 2003 drei. Man sieht an der ge’ ringen Aflzahl, wie intensiv der Überwacher mit einer Per son beschäftigt ist. Zuerst braucht
man allein schon sechs Monate, um möglichst viele Informationen iiber den T,ehensablauf zrr erhal
A. G.t Wie sind Sie dn diese Inlor mationen gekommen2
C. C.: Über den Abfall, das Telefon, die Post, das Internet. Mit zuneh-
Ständige Überwachung und Verfolgung kann Leben zerstören. _; 0dr Bev il l:tr..krhoto
lungen, die dies taten. Manchmal war ich aber vor Ort, wenn diese arbeiteten.
A. G.t Können Sie genauer beschreiben, wie der Waffenein satz geschah?
C. C.: Es ist ein bisschen wie in einem Science Fiction Film. Personen können überallhin verfoiSt werden über Radar, Satellit, eine Basisstation und ergänzende Computerpro Bramme. Häufig wurden zum Beispiel drei Radargeräte im größeren Umkreis der Pe$on positioniert. Der Radar selr- det elektrcmagnetische Wellen aus, fängt einige wieder aui die an der Person auftrafen und zurückkehrten, und wertet das Ertebnis aus. Meine Freunde, die in den Spezialabtei Iungen gearbeitet haben, konnten dann die Person auf ih- rem Computer den ganzen Tag verfolgen.
Diese Lokalisierung machte es dann auch leicht, die Waf fen gezielt einzusetzen. Die Koliegen konnten Senau seh en, wohin sie zielen mussten und auch wie die Person dar- auf reagiert.
A- G- Welche Wirkungen hatten die Waffen auf die Personen2 C. C.r Sie konlten Hitze verursachen, inneres Brennen, Schmerzen, Brechreiz, Angste. Manchmal blieben auf der Haut Spuren zurück, meist aber nicht. Wenn diese Leute zum Arzt 8€hen, sagt er, es ist alles O. K. mit ihnen. Was ich hier erzähle, ist allerdings der Stand von vor zehn Jahren. Mittlerweile ist die Technik noch weiter fortgeschritten.
A. G-: Welches Zicl wurde mit dem Beschuss oetolqt2
C. C.: Man versucht, die Leute einzuschüchtern, zum Beispiel Leute, die 8roßen Lärm
machen, die über die Medi- en Alarm schlagen wollen. Ich selbst wurde auch drei Jahre lang beschossen, als ich ausge stiegen bin. Ich bin so gut rvie sicher, dass bei mir in den Jah rcr’2003/2004 Waffen zum Ein’ satz kamen, die starke Aggres sionen provozieren. Ich hätte damals zweimal beinahe je- manden umgebracht, e inmal me ine Nachbarin, eine nette alte Dame.
48 rqum&zeit 161/2009
Geb. 1962, wohnhaft in Norfolk, LJ.K., arbeitete über 20 Jahre für verschiedene Geheimdienste.
A. C; Haben Sie diese Wallen auch ein gesetzt2
C. C.: Nein, ich war für die Überwa
Versuche, Personen in den Wahnsinn zu treiben A.G.: Sie denken, es ist heute durch elektromagnetische Strah
len möglich, die Gefiihle qezielt zu bceinflussen?
C. C.: Eindeutig. Wir wissen, dass der Organismus sehr sensi bcl auf elektromagnetische Suahlung reagiert. Elementar€ Le bensvol8änge an den Zellen Sehen när ich mit biogenen elek tnrmagnetischen &hwingungen eidter FlequenT-en \”on außcn könncn diese Prozesse stören oder verändem. Es gab im Rah men militärischer Forschung schon weitreichende Versuche, Köpet Seele und Geist über Flequenzen zu beeinflussen.
Es ist möglich, Argste, Aggressionen, NeNosität oder Ver
gesslichkeit auf diese Weise zu fördern. In Kombination mit noch anderen InteNentionen kann man eine Person so wahnslnnig machen. Zum B€ispiel werden Radiofrequenzen manipulieft, sodass der Betroffene seinen eigenen Nanen im Radio hört oder sein Computer zeigt seinen Namen immet wieder an. Auch werden einer Person Sezielt Stimmen Sesen’ det, die ihr Gcdanken eingeben oder ihr Tun kommentieren. Ich hörtc beispielsweise am Morgefl nach dem Aufstehen ei- ne Stimme, die sagte: ,,Steh auf qnd Detletze!”
A. G: Peßonen Detden also gezielt in psgchische Extreme geticben2
C. C.: Ja, manchc Personen will man regelrecht in die Psychiatrie bringen. Wenn eine betroffene Person nach Hilfe suchl und zur Polizei oder zum Arzt 8cht, nimmt
man sie nicht ernst. EiniSe der Arzte und auch einige Krankcnhäuser arbeiten mit den Geheimdiensten zu- sammen. Die diagnostischen Richtlinien erlauben cs, je manden als schizophrel.} einzustufen, wenn er sich ver folgt fühlt und Stimmen hört.
A. G: Krankenhtiuset kaoperiercn mit Geheimdiensten2
C. C.:Ja, aufjeden Fall. Auch 8roße Firmcn, weshalb man ge iährlich lebt, wenn man etwas Segen grcße Firmen anzettelt. Der amcrikanische Staat schützt große Unternehmen wie Mc Donalds, Coca Cola, oder bcstimmte Phannalonzeme. Er slellt rJ.rncn auch FBl-Agenten zur Verfugung fur Industriespionage Angelegenheiten. Eine große Rolle in diesem Neu spielen auch die Freinaurer, von denen es bei der CL{ sehr viele gibt.
Es gab im Rahmen militärischer Forschung schon weitreichende Versuche, Körper, Seele und Geist über Frequenzen zu beeinflussen.
ln Kombination mit noch anderen lnterventionen kann man eine Person wahnsinnig machen.
Riesiges Uberwachungsnetz
A. G.t Wßsen Sie, in welchen kindem Geheimdienstc Einzelper
sonen überwachen und Enetgie Waffen bei ihnen einsexcn2
C. C.: In den USA, Deutschland, China, Nordkorea, Russ
land, Frankreich und England, gewöhlich ohne das offi- zielle Wissen der dortiSen Regierungen. Aber inoffizicll denke ich, muss es immer Regierungspersonen geben, die in irSendein€r Weise involviert sind beziehungsweise dar- über ehvas wissen-
A. G.: I4lissex Sie u|ie L)iele Leute übernacht werden?
C. C.: In England sind es circa 5 000 Leute, die überwacht werden und circa 15 000 Überwacher. Neben den großen Geheimdiensten gibt es dort noch 300 bis’100 kleine Ge heimdienstfirme r, die von ehemaliSen Polizisten oder Ge hcimdienstlern gegründet wurden. Sie haben vom lnncn
ministerium selbst die Erlaubnis, zu überwachen, Fotos zu machen, lnformationen zu beschaffen. Sie bezahlen ihre Mitarbeiter sehr gut.
A. G.. War es ffu Sie ein Problem, ztDischen den Geheim diensten zu wechselfl?
C. C.: Nein, für die neuen Auftraggeber war es immer po sitiv, weil sie auf diese Weise auch noch Informationen über die anderen Geheimdienste von mir erhalten konn ten. Denn die Broßen Geheimdienste misstrauen sich 8e- genseitig. Ich verdiente dadurch mehr.
rqum&zeit rorlzoos 49
5000 Personen werden alleine in England überwacht,
so der ehemalige Geheimdienst-
Mitarbeiter Carl Clark.
raum&zeit lnterview
Ausstieg
A. G.t Warum sind Sie ausgestiegen?
C. C.: Ich sah, dass es falsch war, was ich gemacht habe. Die letzten zwei kutc, auf die ich angesetzt war, hatten nichts tetan. Sie waren ganz normale, nette Menschen, nicht krimi- nell, nicht politisch oder wirtschaftlich gefährlich. Die einzige Vermutung, die ich diesbezüglich hatte, war, dass es irgend wie mit der DNA oder dem Blut dieser Leute zusammenhing. In neuerer Zeit wird hierja sehr viel geforscht. Die DNA wird mit den letzten Details unseres Charaktcrs in Verbindung gc bracht. Das Human Genome Prcject analysiete von 1993 bis 2004 alle Basenpaare des Menschen, sammelte auch die ge netischen Daten bedrohter Völker (Human Gel]om€ Diversj- ty Project) und verglich die Ergebnisse. Unsere Auftraggeber rvaren auch immer sehr scharf auf DNA-Analysen der kute, die wir überwachten. Es gehörte immer zu unseren Haupt aufgaben in den erstcn Tagen der Überwachung, DNA- bzw Blutanalysen dieser I€ute zu organisieren-
A. G.tsie eta.ihnten beteits, dass Sie Ptobleme bekamen, als Sie 2003 ausstiegen. Können Sie hiefitit noch eitl paat Bei spiele anführcn2
C. C.: Als ich mit einem Lastwagen in der Nacht 3000 Meilen fuhr, um Pakete auszufahren, verfolgte mich immer ein Heli kopter Ais ich auf eincr Allee endangging gritf mich ein Mann an und versetzte mir einen Schlag. Einmal hatte jemand drei Befcstigungen von meinem Motor entfernt, auf der Autobahn fiel der Motor plötzlich runter Ein andercs Mal, als ich einen l,ashvaSen mit drei Tonnen Gewicht fuhr, explodierten plötz lich glcichzeitig zwci Rcifen. Die Polizei, die hinzu kam, sagte, so eh’vas hätten sie noch nie gesehen. Einmal w-urde ich beim
Autofahrcn sehr lange vedolgt. Dies machte mich so h.ütend, dass ich abnipt das Auto anhielt, meinen Baseballschläg€r nahm u[d ausstieS. Da zogen drei Autos, die hinter mir \\’a- ren, mit hoher Geschwindigkeit dckwärts ab. Wenn es nor lnale kute gewesen wären, hätten sie dies der Polizei gemel det, haben sie aber nicht.
Dann schickte man mir drei Mal Leutc, die freundschaft lichen Kontakt zu mir herstellen sollten, um mich auszu’ spionieren. Da ich wusste, dass ich am Telefon abgehört
Anzeige
Erhöhen Sie lhre persönliche Schwingung mil einer Teslaplane. Weitere Verwendunqsmöqlichkeiten I Störf elder, Wasseradern, Chakra Ausgleich u.v.m. Einiges mehr über die positiven Auswirkungen finden Sie im lnte.net und in der Broschüre.
TESLAPLATTEN IN SCHWEIZER OUALITAT – SWISS TESLA Nach Nikola Tesla empfangen die Plalten kosmische Energie / Atherschwlngungen. Freie Energie war ihm ein wichtiges Anliegen und er ent\,vickelte die Platten a’s Teil eines Emplängers für Strahlungsenergie (radiant energy).
BESTELLEN SIE JETZT! Z.B. das Spezialangebot B:
1 Tesla World Informationsbroschüre mit 96 Seiten,
1 Purpurplatte 8.5 x 5.5 cm und 1 Purpurplatte 21 x 21 cm tlir nur EUR 59.- / CHF 89.-, zal veGandEuss50/cqE3.
werde, habe ich dann einmal in einem Gespräch verlau- ten lassen, dass ich diese Person, die sich da gerade so in mein Leben schleicht, umbringen werde. Daraufhin ist sie nie mehr erschienen.
A- G: Und Lüie ist es jetzt? Denken Sie, Sie sind immet noch im Visietz
C. C.: Ja, natürlich. Ich habe auch erfahren, dass der Ge heimdienst wissen will, warum ich jetzt nach D€utschland geflogen bin.
A. G.t Leben Sie ddnn im Moment nicht geft:ihtlich?
C. C.: Ich bin ber€it, d€n Kampf g€8en sie zu führen. Sie wisscn auch, dass ich viel über sie weiß und dass ich versuche, etwas gegen ihre Übergriffe zu tun. Ich habe Freunde in den speziellen Einheiten, Leute in Afghanistan und im lrak. die mich unterstützen.
Tipps für Überwachungsopfer
A. G.: Hqben Sie Tipps ftu Mcnschen, die sich überwacht fühien?
C. C.: Es ist Büt, in e maiLs bcstimmte Begriffe zu vermei delr wie ,,Regierung”, ,, Mind Control”, etc. D€nn die digi- tale Überu’achung erfolgt nach beslimmten Suchwörtern. Es wäre gut, darauf zu achten, ob jemand in der wohnung war. Bevor Überwacher nachts in die Wohnung eindrin- gen, setzen sie oft anästhesierende Gase ein, die sie zum Bclspiel durch den Briefkastenschlitz in das Innere drin- gen lassen. Man wacht dann mit einem metallischen Ge schmack im Mund auf. Wenn Autos sich verdächtig ver halten, ist cs ratsam, sich die Autonummern zu merken. Briefe, die njchr eingesehen werden sollen, kann man mit Aluminiumfolle umwickeln.
Man kann mil speziellen Messgeräten hochfrequente Strahlung in der Wohnung überprüfcn.
A. G; Kennen Sie anderc lhistlcblower. die tihnliche Ge schichten rDie Sie eü(ihlen2
C. C.: Bisher nicht. Aber ich hoffe, es werden noch mehr an die Öffentlichkcit fretcn I
Bestellungen & lntormationen lnternetr www’teslaplatten.ch
50 roum&zei+ t6lzoog
E-Mail: Tel./Fax: Brief:
teslaplatten@gmx.ch 0041 (0)61 261 48 86 Teslaplatien.ch Postfach 529 CH-4003 Basel Schweiz
schweze’ produk n schwel26r oualirät I I *trwerzer rärsctruno I-I